Re: UPDATE: x11/st
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:37:00PM -0500, Eric Radman wrote: > They've made significant progress, nice to see. Minor comments: > > * It would be nice of the man page indicated how how to change the font > name AND size: st -f "Anonymous Pro:pixelsize=20" Report to upstream please. > * Perhaps remove -Os from the CFLAGS Done for the OpenBSD port. Regards, Joerg
UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
Hi, I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building some documents on their systems. The extent of my testing so far: - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. - Upgrade path works and is clean. - Plain latex works. - pdftex based compilers work. - texdoc works. - xindy works. - ConTeXt works. The updated port is here: https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
can you please post a usable diff, or a url to such a diff? On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 10:36:28 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: :Hi, : :I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would :appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building :some documents on their systems. : :The extent of my testing so far: : : - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. : - Upgrade path works and is clean. : - Plain latex works. : - pdftex based compilers work. : - texdoc works. : - xindy works. : - ConTeXt works. : :The updated port is here: :https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive : :-- :Best Regards :Edd Barrett : :http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk : -- "The whole world is about three drinks behind." -- Humphrey Bogart
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On 2012/11/06 11:36, Peter Hessler wrote: > can you please post a usable diff, or a url to such a diff? > > On 2012 Nov 06 (Tue) at 10:36:28 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: > :Hi, > : > :I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > :appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > :some documents on their systems. > : > :The extent of my testing so far: > : > : - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > : - Upgrade path works and is clean. > : - Plain latex works. > : - pdftex based compilers work. > : - texdoc works. > : - xindy works. > : - ConTeXt works. > : > :The updated port is here: > :https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > : > :-- > :Best Regards > :Edd Barrett > : > :http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk > : > > -- > "The whole world is about three drinks behind." > -- Humphrey Bogart > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.gz Recipe: - pkg_add rsync-- cvsutils - rsync -avC --delete $wipdir $portdir - cvsu - cvs rm `cvsu|grep ^U` - cvs add `cvsu|grep ^?`
Re: UPDATE: Aget-0.4.1
Now CCing the maintainer, thanks sthen@ - x - From: "Gonzalo L. R." To: Ports Mailing List Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:46:42 -0300 Subject: UPDATE: Aget-0.4.1 Hi, Little update for Aget fo 0.4.1. Tested on i386. Ok? Comments? Cheers. -- Sending from my VCR... Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/aget/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile --- Makefile18 Nov 2008 12:48:41 - 1.1.1.1 +++ Makefile4 Oct 2012 20:46:01 - @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.1.1.1 2008/11/18 12:48:41 okan Exp $ COMMENT = multi threaded HTTP download accelerator -DISTNAME = aget-0.4 +DISTNAME = aget-0.4.1 CATEGORIES = net HOMEPAGE= http://www.enderunix.org/aget/ @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ MAINTAINER = Girish Venkatachalam http://www.enderunix.org/aget/ OBJS = main.o Aget.o Misc.o Head.o Signal.o Download.o Resume.o --CFLAGS = -g -Wall -W -pedantic -+CFLAGS?= -g -Wall -W -pedantic +-CFLAGS = -g -W ++CFLAGS?= -g -W LDFLAGS = -pthread CC = gcc STRIP = strip
Re: PHP 5.3.15 on 5.2-stable
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:02:42AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/11/05 16:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/11/05 16:29, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I noticed that PHP 5.3.15 didn't hit 5.2-stable branch. > > > Was this because lack of testing from people? > > > > Probably due to lack of time rather than anything else. > > Diff for this below. Currently building... BTW as long as this is being updated maybe it could be to 5.3.18 which got released last October: http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.3.18 What do you think?
Re: PHP 5.3.15 on 5.2-stable
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:44:36AM +, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:02:42AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/11/05 16:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2012/11/05 16:29, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that PHP 5.3.15 didn't hit 5.2-stable branch. > > > > Was this because lack of testing from people? > > > > > > Probably due to lack of time rather than anything else. > > > > Diff for this below. > > Currently building... > BTW as long as this is being updated maybe it could be to 5.3.18 which > got released last October: http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.3.18 > What do you think? This is backport to -stable, isn't it? Then usual policy is not to jump to newer version. Info what is backporting and why it is used, could be find here (even not related to OpenBSD) https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/ jirib
Re: PHP 5.3.15 on 5.2-stable
On 2012/11/06 11:44, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:02:42AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/11/05 16:38, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2012/11/05 16:29, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that PHP 5.3.15 didn't hit 5.2-stable branch. > > > > Was this because lack of testing from people? > > > > > > Probably due to lack of time rather than anything else. > > > > Diff for this below. > > Currently building... > BTW as long as this is being updated maybe it could be to 5.3.18 which > got released last October: http://php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.3.18 > What do you think? The 5.3.18 update needs the suhosin patch to be rebuilt.
Re: PHP 5.3.15 on 5.2-stable
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 06:50:46AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > This is backport to -stable, isn't it? Then usual policy > is not to jump to newer version. > > Info what is backporting and why it is used, could be find > here (even not related to OpenBSD) > > https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/ I understand. In this particular case above PHP 5.3.15 there isn't any security fixes that I can see, so we could stick to 5.3.15 in -stable because 5.3.14 in -release is vulnerable. Even though this vulnerability happens only in very special cases as Stuart referenced before.
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:46:10AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.gz Thanks Stuart. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > I have been sitting on this TeX Live update for a bit now. I would > appreciate it if some people could test the upgrade and try building > some documents on their systems. > > The extent of my testing so far: > > - Tested on amd64 and sparc64. > - Upgrade path works and is clean. > - Plain latex works. > - pdftex based compilers work. > - texdoc works. > - xindy works. > - ConTeXt works. > > The updated port is here: > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/print/texlive > > -- > Best Regards > Edd Barrett > > http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk > edd, I have tested plain latex + pdftex based compilers and they work fine with several documents on amd64 as of last week. thanks
