Re: [NEW] x11/cellwriter
ping? On Sat, Jun 28, 2014, at 08:08 AM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Vasily Mikhaylichenko writes: > > Thanks a lot for your feedback Anthony! > > > > I can see that you put a "USE_GROFF = Yes" line in - is this > > intentional? > > Nope, sorry, I added it by mistake. > > > Also, does it still need a MAINTAINER line? I can see that it's gone > > from your version. > > Removed it by mistake. > > sthen@ also pointed out it was missing the gettext MODULE. > > Attached is a new version. > > -- > Anthony J. Bentley > Email had 1 attachment: > + cellwriter.tar.gz > 2k (application/x-gzip)
UPDATE: textproc/the_silver_searcher
Hi list, down below is another short update for the_silver_searcher to the latest version: 0.23. Regards, Florian Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/the_silver_searcher/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 Makefile --- Makefile30 May 2014 13:08:47 - 1.9 +++ Makefile6 Jul 2014 19:08:19 - @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ COMMENT = code searching tool, with a focus on speed (ag) -DISTNAME = the_silver_searcher-0.22.0 +DISTNAME = the_silver_searcher-0.23.0 CATEGORIES = textproc HOMEPAGE = https://github.com/ggreer/the_silver_searcher Index: distinfo === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/the_silver_searcher/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 distinfo --- distinfo30 May 2014 13:08:47 - 1.8 +++ distinfo6 Jul 2014 19:08:19 - @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (the_silver_searcher-0.22.0.tar.gz) = 92r+wHixsC/8xYoaejtHiFHRwbb7z0wz1upctB4a6Vk= -SIZE (the_silver_searcher-0.22.0.tar.gz) = 134482 +SHA256 (the_silver_searcher-0.23.0.tar.gz) = zQ8J6tVNxabsmBU5Bqdpt4B/2Hp4aFzCRXFYU+wSr6g= +SIZE (the_silver_searcher-0.23.0.tar.gz) = 168852
Re: Can't build libiconv on current armv7
> And it's far more than just gperf. So far, I've also stumbled upon > textproc/groff and devel/protobuf failures, all similar (segfaults, > failed assertions that go away with -fno-stack-protector). There is > obviously a fairly major compiler bug that's hit with the new ssp > algorithm on arm, and it's breaking most of the ports tree. Ok, let's drop arm support from the tree until we can switch from gcc to clang.
Re: any users of meta/haskell-platform?
On Jul 04, 2014 23:20, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > the annual haskell updates (upstream) are late this year, but it > looks like there *may* happen a release of ghc-6.8.3 in a few days. > I've no idea how long it takes for upstream to push a new > haskell-platform for it. So, is anyone using meta/haskell-platform > for *real*? Or should I just update ghc (and all affected hs-ports) > and kill meta/haskell-platform? > > Ciao, > Kili > I use it, but I'm ok with removing it. Developers targeting the platform should be able to do so without having it installed.
