Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
Landry Breuil wrote: > ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a > real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using > firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools, > county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the > Enterprise Working Group mailing list.". Yes, the OpenBSD port and packages are supplied to a large user community. I doubt that I can get any kind of end user support from Mozilla.org for my problems with Firefox on OpenBSD. ESR sounds like it is *exactly* targeted at a project like us. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:35:06 +0100, viq wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:09:32AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:39:02 +0100, Landry Breuil > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is > >not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp > >lightning/enigmail.. ports at: > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec > >(all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached) > > > >packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos > >: http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ > > > >It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4.. > > > >Landry > > Firefox tested on i386-current. No issues. Thanks. > > Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan > related to ESR releases?. > > 1. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools, county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the Enterprise Working Group mailing list.". in that case, _contract_ me and i'll be happy to provide ESR ports/binaries for every supported OpenBSD release. It would be more work initially, but maybe it would be something easier to maintain in the long run on -STABLE ? This is the point for my question. I miss a secure and modern version of firefox in -stable. I know, I know, the development is realized in -current and the committers are overworked :) . I asked you because I want know if you will create a port for firefox10 (www/firefox10, like www/firefox36) when firefox11 arrives. You will be able to drop the maintainership and someone interested could take this. No extra work for you. I would like help with this, but I need learn well the port system before of getting involved in something like this. Of course, ESR is supported _by mozilla_ on the platforms mozilla supports, ie linux/win/macos/android, and by no means OpenBSD. Source code is provided, but if it breaks/doesnt fit your expectations you're on your own. ESR doesn't really match the point releases previously seen in 3.5.x/3.6.x branches which received way more fixes. Oh well, we'll see over time how it evolves. Yes, time will tell. Cheers. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:09:32AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:39:02 +0100, Landry Breuil > > wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is > > >not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp > > >lightning/enigmail.. ports at: > > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta > > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta > > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta > > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec > > >(all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached) > > > > > >packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos > > >: http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ > > > > > >It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4.. > > > > > >Landry > > > > Firefox tested on i386-current. No issues. Thanks. > > > > Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan > > related to ESR releases?. > > > > 1. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ > > ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a > real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using > firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools, > county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the > Enterprise Working Group mailing list.". in that case, _contract_ me > and i'll be happy to provide ESR ports/binaries for every supported > OpenBSD release. It would be more work initially, but maybe it would be something easier to maintain in the long run on -STABLE ? > Of course, ESR is supported _by mozilla_ on the platforms mozilla > supports, ie linux/win/macos/android, and by no means OpenBSD. Source > code is provided, but if it breaks/doesnt fit your expectations you're > on your own. > > ESR doesn't really match the point releases previously seen in > 3.5.x/3.6.x branches which received way more fixes. Oh well, we'll see > over time how it evolves. > > Landry -- viq pgpRbMPCqlnJy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:09:32AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: > > Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan > > related to ESR releases?. > > ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a > real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using > firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools, > county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the > Enterprise Working Group mailing list.". in that case, _contract_ me > and i'll be happy to provide ESR ports/binaries for every supported > OpenBSD release. Am I the only one who's bugged by using ESR as an acronym that *doesn't stand* for Eric Schwarz Raymond ? You silly mozilla...
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 05:39:02PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi, > > packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos > : http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ Runs fine on i386 -current.
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 04:09:32AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:39:02 +0100, Landry Breuil > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is > >not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp > >lightning/enigmail.. ports at: > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta > >http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec > >(all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached) > > > >packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos > >: http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ > > > >It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4.. > > > >Landry > > Firefox tested on i386-current. No issues. Thanks. > > Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan > related to ESR releases?. > > 1. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ ESR isn't really targeted to the average joe user, so unless there is a real need and someone proves me he deploys OpenBSD desktops using firefox in "large organizations such as universities and other schools, county or city governments and businesses" and that he "sign up for the Enterprise Working Group mailing list.". in that case, _contract_ me and i'll be happy to provide ESR ports/binaries for every supported OpenBSD release. Of course, ESR is supported _by mozilla_ on the platforms mozilla supports, ie linux/win/macos/android, and by no means OpenBSD. Source code is provided, but if it breaks/doesnt fit your expectations you're on your own. ESR doesn't really match the point releases previously seen in 3.5.x/3.6.x branches which received way more fixes. Oh well, we'll see over time how it evolves. Landry
Re: [wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:39:02 +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: Hi, Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp lightning/enigmail.. ports at: http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec (all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached) packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos : http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4.. Landry Firefox tested on i386-current. No issues. Thanks. Firefox 10 is the first Firefox ESR[1]. Do you have some plan related to ESR releases?. 1. http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/ -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
[wip] Firefox/Thunderbird 10.0 / Seamonkey 2.7
Hi, Fx 10.0 & friends were released, if you want it to make 5.1 (which is not sure at all) please test every possible usecase, esp lightning/enigmail.. ports at: http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-thunderbird/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/seamonkey/log/?h=beta http://rhaalovely.net/cgit/mozilla-firefox/log/?h=fennec (all ports needs a small mozilla.port.mk diff, attached) packages against somewhat -current (ie gettext w/ libintl.6) in my repos : http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/ http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/ It builds & runs fine on ppc too, as of beta4.. Landry ? fx10.moz.pot.mk.diff Index: mozilla.port.mk === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/mozilla/mozilla.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -r1.38 mozilla.port.mk --- mozilla.port.mk 10 Jan 2012 23:58:27 - 1.38 +++ mozilla.port.mk 1 Feb 2012 16:29:21 - @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ SHARED_LIBS += ${_lib} ${SO_VERSION} .endfor -PKGNAME ?= ${MOZILLA_PROJECT}-${MOZILLA_VERSION} +PKGNAME ?= ${MOZILLA_PROJECT}-${MOZILLA_VERSION:S/b/beta/} MAINTAINER ?= Landry Breuil @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS += --enable-system-sqlite CONFIGURE_ENV += ac_cv_sqlite_secure_delete=yes +# avoids OOM when linking libxul +CONFIGURE_ENV += LDFLAGS="-Wl,--no-keep-memory" + WANTLIB += ${MODMOZ_WANTLIB} BUILD_DEPENDS +=${MODMOZ_BUILD_DEPENDS} LIB_DEPENDS += ${MODMOZ_LIB_DEPENDS} @@ -151,8 +154,11 @@ MOZILLA_SUBST_FILES += ${_MOZDIR}/xpcom/io/nsAppFileLocationProvider.cpp \ ${_MOZDIR}/build/unix/mozilla.in \ ${_MOZDIR}/extensions/spellcheck/hunspell/src/mozHunspell.cpp \ - ${_MOZDIR}/js/src/xpconnect/shell/Makefile.in \ ${_MOZDIR}/toolkit/xre/nsXREDirProvider.cpp + +.if ${MOZILLA_BRANCH} == 1.9.1 || ${MOZILLA_BRANCH} == 1.9.2 +MOZILLA_SUBST_FILES += ${_MOZDIR}/js/src/xpconnect/shell/Makefile.in +.endif pre-configure: .for d in ${MOZILLA_AUTOCONF_DIRS}