Did someone adopt graphics/ffmpeg?
Hi, I need an update to ffmpeg that includes its libswscale, and if nobody is looking into this already, I'd start working on an update. However, I am unable to provide a reliable download site for a snapshot tarball of ffmpeg's size. In that area, I'd definitely need some help ... Moritz
Re: Did someone adopt graphics/ffmpeg?
On 12/14/06, Nikns Siankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-portsm=116584632732016w=2 Without swscale. Hovever it can be modified to build libswscale if it is usefull. I don't know for *what it does*. However, multimedia/transcode is too outdated to use with updated ffmpeg. transcode has been talking about trying to get a release out in the real near future, or at least that's the feeling i'm getting from their mailing lists. CK -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
Re: Did someone adopt graphics/ffmpeg?
Nikns Siankin wrote: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-portsm=116584632732016w=2 Ah, thanks. Without swscale. Hovever it can be modified to build libswscale if it is usefull. I don't know for *what it does*. However, multimedia/transcode is too outdated to use with updated ffmpeg. A port of ffmpeg2theora is what I want to resubmit (original submission was forgotten, due to pre-4.0 lock stress.) The latest version depends on libswscale for rescaling video streams. I could resubmit the older version of the port, which works with -current's ffmpeg, of course ... It is already capable of rescaling by itself, but not as good and possibly not as fast. Would such a port be commitable? If yes, no problem. The ffmpeg2theora port can then be updated as soon as there's an ffmpeg update available. In any case, I want to request that any update to graphics/ffmpeg contains libswscale as well. Moritz I need an update to ffmpeg that includes its libswscale, and if nobody [...]
Re: Did someone adopt graphics/ffmpeg?
I don't see why ffmpeg2theora could not be commitable. So. Lets test how transcode cvs version works with ffmpeg on openbsd, before it's released. And see how trivial it is to enable libswscale build in ffmpeg on openbsd. On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:21:50PM +0100, Moritz Grimm wrote: Nikns Siankin wrote: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-portsm=116584632732016w=2 Ah, thanks. Without swscale. Hovever it can be modified to build libswscale if it is usefull. I don't know for *what it does*. However, multimedia/transcode is too outdated to use with updated ffmpeg. A port of ffmpeg2theora is what I want to resubmit (original submission was forgotten, due to pre-4.0 lock stress.) The latest version depends on libswscale for rescaling video streams. I could resubmit the older version of the port, which works with -current's ffmpeg, of course ... It is already capable of rescaling by itself, but not as good and possibly not as fast. Would such a port be commitable? If yes, no problem. The ffmpeg2theora port can then be updated as soon as there's an ffmpeg update available. In any case, I want to request that any update to graphics/ffmpeg contains libswscale as well. Moritz I need an update to ffmpeg that includes its libswscale, and if nobody [...]
