Re: -fstack-protecor-strong for gcc 4.8
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 01:30:16 +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:16:23PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > This patch from brad@ backports -fstack-protector-strong support from > > 4.9. It seems to work fine on amd64 amd powerpc, but I think it could > > really use some more test coverage as it's a somewhat intrusive change. > > Sorry for slacking... No negative effects observed on sparc64 so far. Put > it in and see what breaks? > > d'accord. Brad, put it in.
Re: -fstack-protecor-strong for gcc 4.8
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:16:23PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > This patch from brad@ backports -fstack-protector-strong support from > 4.9. It seems to work fine on amd64 amd powerpc, but I think it could > really use some more test coverage as it's a somewhat intrusive change. Sorry for slacking... No negative effects observed on sparc64 so far. Put it in and see what breaks?