Re: -fstack-protecor-strong for gcc 4.8

2014-06-08 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 01:30:16 +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:16:23PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> > This patch from brad@ backports -fstack-protector-strong support from
> > 4.9.  It seems to work fine on amd64 amd powerpc, but I think it could
> > really use some more test coverage as it's a somewhat intrusive change.
> 
> Sorry for slacking... No negative effects observed on sparc64 so far. Put
> it in and see what breaks?
> 
> 

d'accord.  Brad, put it in.



Re: -fstack-protecor-strong for gcc 4.8

2014-06-03 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:16:23PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> This patch from brad@ backports -fstack-protector-strong support from
> 4.9.  It seems to work fine on amd64 amd powerpc, but I think it could
> really use some more test coverage as it's a somewhat intrusive change.

Sorry for slacking... No negative effects observed on sparc64 so far. Put
it in and see what breaks?