Re: NEW: devel/sdl2-mixer
On 30/10/13 7:49 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: * sdl2-mixer requires SMPEG=2.0.0, so it does not have MP3 support. This doesn't affect my needs (manaplus uses ogg). However, I've left the DESCR and other bits talking about MP3 on the assumption that someone will update SMPEG at some point. This would not be a port update but a new port, .e.g. devel/smpeg2. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: NEW: devel/sdl2-mixer
On 10/30/2013 8:09 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On 30/10/13 7:49 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: * sdl2-mixer requires SMPEG=2.0.0, so it does not have MP3 support. This doesn't affect my needs (manaplus uses ogg). However, I've left the DESCR and other bits talking about MP3 on the assumption that someone will update SMPEG at some point. This would not be a port update but a new port, .e.g. devel/smpeg2. The point of that comment was to say I'm not doing it.
Re: NEW: devel/sdl2-mixer
On 30/10/13 8:18 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: On 10/30/2013 8:09 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On 30/10/13 7:49 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: * sdl2-mixer requires SMPEG=2.0.0, so it does not have MP3 support. This doesn't affect my needs (manaplus uses ogg). However, I've left the DESCR and other bits talking about MP3 on the assumption that someone will update SMPEG at some point. This would not be a port update but a new port, .e.g. devel/smpeg2. The point of that comment was to say I'm not doing it. Then wait and I'll do it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: NEW: devel/sdl2-mixer
On 10/30/2013 8:33 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On 30/10/13 8:18 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: On 10/30/2013 8:09 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On 30/10/13 7:49 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: * sdl2-mixer requires SMPEG=2.0.0, so it does not have MP3 support. This doesn't affect my needs (manaplus uses ogg). However, I've left the DESCR and other bits talking about MP3 on the assumption that someone will update SMPEG at some point. This would not be a port update but a new port, .e.g. devel/smpeg2. The point of that comment was to say I'm not doing it. Then wait and I'll do it. While I'm happy that you'll work on smpeg2 I don't really see the point of waiting (unless you're working on smpeg2 right now). I have a consumer for sdl2-mixer today, one that doesn't need the mp3 support. sdl2-mixer will have, at most, one port that depends on it by the time your smpeg2 port comes around. Adding it in will be trivial; it's not like there will be 50 ports depending on it and careful testing will need to be done for each dependent port.
