Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Brad Smith wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: >> Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 >> but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern >> FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, >> bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of >> the dependent ports. >> >> Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this >> update but there are still some ports that need some work. >> >> h323plus - needs patching/testing >> >> http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ Can't get to Brad's server. Anyone have the patch files archived elsewhere? --patrick > > I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of > new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo > decoder (CVE-2012-0947). > > Almost all of the ports tree plus the few patches included with the > FFmpeg update leave only h323plus left. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. >
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On 22/05/12 1:25 AM, patrick keshishian wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of the dependent ports. Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this update but there are still some ports that need some work. h323plus - needs patching/testing http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ Can't get to Brad's server. Anyone have the patch files archived elsewhere? Sorry about that. Server is back up again. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Brad Smith wrote: > On 22/05/12 1:25 AM, patrick keshishian wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Brad Smith wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of the dependent ports. Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this update but there are still some ports that need some work. h323plus - needs patching/testing http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ >> >> >> Can't get to Brad's server. Anyone have the patch files archived >> elsewhere? > > > Sorry about that. Server is back up again. thanks.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, > bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of > the dependent ports. > > Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this > update but there are still some ports that need some work. > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ I have updated the diffs and updated to a newer FFmpeg snapshot to include the same set of security/bug fixes along the branch as was included for the FFmpeg in the ports tree. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > mplayer - needs patching/testing or updating I have been wanting to update mplayer for some time. When I find some time, I will get onto that. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On 02/05/12 6:30 PM, Brad Smith wrote: Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of the dependent ports. Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this update but there are still some ports that need some work. transcode - update pending picard - update pending opencv - needs build checking k3b - needs patching/testing h323plus - needs patching/testing mplayer - needs patching/testing or updating http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ Posted a diff for MPlayer. So that leaves just h323plus left. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, > bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of > the dependent ports. > > Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this > update but there are still some ports that need some work. > > h323plus - needs patching/testing > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo decoder (CVE-2012-0947). Almost all of the ports tree plus the few patches included with the FFmpeg update leave only h323plus left. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
- Original message - > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new > > encoders/decoders, bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some > > diffs for some of the dependent ports. > > > > Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this > > update but there are still some ports that need some work. > > > > h323plus - needs patching/testing > > > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ > > I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of > new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo > decoder (CVE-2012-0947). > > Almost all of the ports tree plus the few patches included with the > FFmpeg update leave only h323plus left. Please test if using anything not x86 but especially macppc. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On Tue, 08 May 2012 02:23:38 -0400 Brad Smith wrote: > - Original message - > > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:30:08PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > > > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > > > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new > > > encoders/decoders, bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some > > > diffs for some of the dependent ports. > > > > > > Most of the ports tree is in good shape to be able to build with this > > > update but there are still some ports that need some work. > > > > > > h323plus - needs patching/testing > > > > > > http://comstyle.com/ports/ffmpeg/ > > > > I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of > > new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo > > decoder (CVE-2012-0947). > > > > Almost all of the ports tree plus the few patches included with the > > FFmpeg update leave only h323plus left. > > Please test if using anything not x86 but especially macppc. > Even though I have amd64 I tested this anyway using mplayer, with a bunch of videos that mplayer reported as ffmpeg VP8, H264, MPEG-4 and MPEG-1. All worked well. I tried both the earlier 20120428 and today's 20120508 ffmpeg versions. Brett.
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On May 02 18:30:08, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, > bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of > the dependent ports. On May 08 01:21:50, Brad Smith wrote: > I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of > new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo > decoder (CVE-2012-0947). > Please test if using anything not x86 but especially macppc. Testing on amd64/current (an intel-based macbook). The new ffmpeg builds and seems to work just fine. I haven't tested any of the new encoders/decoders though. Jan
Re: WIP: FFmpeg 20120428 snapshot
On May 09 16:02:15, Jan Stary wrote: > On May 02 18:30:08, Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is a work in progress update to an FFmpeg snaphot dated 20120428 > > but now from the 0.10 branch. This brings us up to date with a modern > > FFmpeg release branch and buys us a whole load of new encoders/decoders, > > bug fixes and varius improvements. As well as some diffs for some of > > the dependent ports. > > On May 08 01:21:50, Brad Smith wrote: > > I have rolled a new snapshot as of today (0508) to get a bunch of > > new security/bug fixes including the security issue with the vqavideo > > decoder (CVE-2012-0947). > > Please test if using anything not x86 but especially macppc. > > Testing on amd64/current (an intel-based macbook). > > The new ffmpeg builds and seems to work just fine. > I haven't tested any of the new encoders/decoders though. The new mplayer built on top of that seems to work fine, too (as "tested" by playing most types of the movie files I got here - is there some prefered mplayer test I should run?)
