Re: draft port of libspf2
On Tue 2007.11.13 at 15:15 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote: On Tue 2007.11.13 at 21:00 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: On 13 nov 2007, at 19.59, Okan Demirmen wrote: On Tue 2007.11.13 at 18:47 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: I've created a port of libspf2 - feedback and comments appreciated. issues regarding threading would be very useful. - http://www.rfc.se/~jakob/openbsd/libspf2.tar.gz 2 collisions with p5-Mail-SPF-Query bin/spfd bin/spfquery hmmm... how would we handle that? well, that's a good question... i don't really see a @conflict marker helping, for one would be stuck further up with the dependants. since those 2 already exist in the tree, removing them completely might not be wise, but what are their uses anyway? the p5-Mail-SPF-Query dependants use the library, not the (perl) scripts. the same could be said for libspf2 too. could those sit in share/examples instead, for both ports? here's a version with bits in libexec/libspf2/ instead of bin/ (plus a few minor tweaks) libspf2.tar.gz Description: application/tar-gz
Re: draft port of libspf2
On Tue 2007.11.13 at 18:47 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: I've created a port of libspf2 - feedback and comments appreciated. issues regarding threading would be very useful. - http://www.rfc.se/~jakob/openbsd/libspf2.tar.gz 2 collisions with p5-Mail-SPF-Query bin/spfd bin/spfquery minor: no need for 's in COMMENT, nor is the PKGNAME var
Re: draft port of libspf2
On 13 nov 2007, at 19.59, Okan Demirmen wrote: On Tue 2007.11.13 at 18:47 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: I've created a port of libspf2 - feedback and comments appreciated. issues regarding threading would be very useful. - http://www.rfc.se/~jakob/openbsd/libspf2.tar.gz 2 collisions with p5-Mail-SPF-Query bin/spfd bin/spfquery hmmm... how would we handle that? jakob
Re: draft port of libspf2
On Tue 2007.11.13 at 21:00 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: On 13 nov 2007, at 19.59, Okan Demirmen wrote: On Tue 2007.11.13 at 18:47 +0100, Jakob Schlyter wrote: I've created a port of libspf2 - feedback and comments appreciated. issues regarding threading would be very useful. - http://www.rfc.se/~jakob/openbsd/libspf2.tar.gz 2 collisions with p5-Mail-SPF-Query bin/spfd bin/spfquery hmmm... how would we handle that? well, that's a good question... i don't really see a @conflict marker helping, for one would be stuck further up with the dependants. since those 2 already exist in the tree, removing them completely might not be wise, but what are their uses anyway? the p5-Mail-SPF-Query dependants use the library, not the (perl) scripts. the same could be said for libspf2 too. could those sit in share/examples instead, for both ports?
