Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/04/08 01:31, Joe MacDonald wrote: > > Matthieu Herrb laas.fr> writes: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08:06AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jay Reffner <1cc386ea8e470a > > gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Attached is a diff -su of the wpa_supplicant in ports/security. > It should > > > > > work on wired (EAPOL) and wireless (WPA/WPS) with all the 802.1x > > protocols. > > > > > Smart Card support (PCSC) is not built in but can be if someone > will > > update > > > > > security/pcsc-lite-1.0.1.p0. It is too outdated and needs updating > to > > 1.5.5 > > > > > to work. > > > > > > > > > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am *very* interested in trying this portm please resend properly. > > > > > > I'm working with Jay to get his patches in a form that apply. > > > I'll resend his patch to ports@ once I get something that looks good. > > > > > > > Did anything ever come of this? I'm looking for a wireless solution > > that will let me log in to work from home and that requires EAP-PEAP and > > MSCHAPV2, which seems to make wpa_supplicant the best hope I've got on > > OpenBSD. I don't see an updated version in the ports tree, though, so I > > was wondering if it fell off the radar or was unfixable or what. > > I have no idea if it works with wireless interfaces or not, but the > version of wpa_supplicant in-tree has been updated to 0.7.3 > > Yeah, that's what I started from as a base for my own attempt. The default config only enables the wired drivers, so I tried enabling the 'bsd' driver and the 'ralink' driver since those seemed to be the most likely to work given my wireless is a TP-LINK TL-WN321G (a/k/a rum(4)). There were some minor compilation issues with driver_ralink.c but there's quite a bit more in driver_bsd.c so that's when I started googling and found this thread which seemed like it had something I could use, but the patches got lost in a cvs usage error. That's too bad. -- Joe MacDonald :wq
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
On 2012/04/08 01:31, Joe MacDonald wrote: > Matthieu Herrb laas.fr> writes: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08:06AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jay Reffner <1cc386ea8e470a > gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Attached is a diff -su of the wpa_supplicant in ports/security. It > > > > should > > > > work on wired (EAPOL) and wireless (WPA/WPS) with all the 802.1x > protocols. > > > > Smart Card support (PCSC) is not built in but can be if someone will > update > > > > security/pcsc-lite-1.0.1.p0. It is too outdated and needs updating to > 1.5.5 > > > > to work. > > > > > > > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems. > > > > > > > > > > I am *very* interested in trying this portm please resend properly. > > > > I'm working with Jay to get his patches in a form that apply. > > I'll resend his patch to ports@ once I get something that looks good. > > > > Did anything ever come of this? I'm looking for a wireless solution > that will let me log in to work from home and that requires EAP-PEAP and > MSCHAPV2, which seems to make wpa_supplicant the best hope I've got on > OpenBSD. I don't see an updated version in the ports tree, though, so I > was wondering if it fell off the radar or was unfixable or what. I have no idea if it works with wireless interfaces or not, but the version of wpa_supplicant in-tree has been updated to 0.7.3
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
Matthieu Herrb laas.fr> writes: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08:06AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jay Reffner <1cc386ea8e470a gmail.com> wrote: > > > Attached is a diff -su of the wpa_supplicant in ports/security. It should > > > work on wired (EAPOL) and wireless (WPA/WPS) with all the 802.1x protocols. > > > Smart Card support (PCSC) is not built in but can be if someone will update > > > security/pcsc-lite-1.0.1.p0. It is too outdated and needs updating to 1.5.5 > > > to work. > > > > > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems. > > > > > > > I am *very* interested in trying this portm please resend properly. > > I'm working with Jay to get his patches in a form that apply. > I'll resend his patch to ports@ once I get something that looks good. > Did anything ever come of this? I'm looking for a wireless solution that will let me log in to work from home and that requires EAP-PEAP and MSCHAPV2, which seems to make wpa_supplicant the best hope I've got on OpenBSD. I don't see an updated version in the ports tree, though, so I was wondering if it fell off the radar or was unfixable or what. Thanks, -J.
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08:06AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jay Reffner <1cc386ea8e4...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Attached is a diff -su of the wpa_supplicant in ports/security. It should > > work on wired (EAPOL) and wireless (WPA/WPS) with all the 802.1x protocols. > > Smart Card support (PCSC) is not built in but can be if someone will update > > security/pcsc-lite-1.0.1.p0. It is too outdated and needs updating to 1.5.5 > > to work. > > > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems. > > > > I am *very* interested in trying this portm please resend properly. I'm working with Jay to get his patches in a form that apply. I'll resend his patch to ports@ once I get something that looks good. -- Matthieu Herrb
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Jay Reffner <1cc386ea8e4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is a diff -su of the wpa_supplicant in ports/security. It should > work on wired (EAPOL) and wireless (WPA/WPS) with all the 802.1x protocols. > Smart Card support (PCSC) is not built in but can be if someone will update > security/pcsc-lite-1.0.1.p0. It is too outdated and needs updating to 1.5.5 > to work. > > Please test and let me know if there are any problems. > I am *very* interested in trying this portm please resend properly. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
hi, I've some interest in testing that, to get access to the network at the local university. However: On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:16:11PM -0500, Jay Reffner wrote: > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: CVS > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-common_h > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-config > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-driver_wired_c > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-os_internal_c > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-os_unix_c > Only in /tmp/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-wpa_supplicant_Makefile > Only in /tmp/wpa_supplicant/patches: patch-wpa_supplicant__config > Only in /usr/ports/security/wpa_supplicant/pkg: CVS You need to cvs add/remove the added/removed patches so that cvs diff includes them. -- Matthieu Herrb
Re: wpa_supplicant 0.6.10p0 testing needed
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:16:11 -0500, Jay Reffner wrote: >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > Perhaps the rest would be readable if you used something that doesn't do all that fancy shit. See http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html Paragraph headed "Be considerate of other subscribers on the mailing lists. Plain text, 72 characters per line" *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the list. Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. Rod/ --- This life is not the real thing. It is not even in Beta. If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
