Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64 > > builds. > > > > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64? > > It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it > instead: > > - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc > - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked > software, the development list is dead since more than a decade > - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason > - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is > still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is > even a warning about that when you start it :) OK fcambus@ to remove.
Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:07:01AM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500 > > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64 > > > builds. > > > > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64? > > > It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it > > instead: > > > - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc > > - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked > > software, the development list is dead since more than a decade > > - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason > > - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is > > still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is > > even a warning about that when you start it :) > > I was touching that code? Gross. :) > > ok kmos to remove > > --Kurt > ok solene@ for removal
Re: Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 07:42:29AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500 > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64 > > builds. > > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64? > It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it > instead: > - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc > - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked > software, the development list is dead since more than a decade > - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason > - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is > still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is > even a warning about that when you start it :) I was touching that code? Gross. :) ok kmos to remove --Kurt
Remove net/mutella (Was: Re: Mark net/mutella BROKEN-sparc64)
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:44:19 -0500 Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > net/mutella has never built successfully while I've run sparc64 > builds. > > ok to mark BROKEN-sparc64? It builds with ports-clang on powerpc, but i think we should remove it instead: - SIGILL on amd64, hits the stack protector on powerpc - last release is from 2004, and we're talking about some networked software, the development list is dead since more than a decade - it has been removed since years on other OSes for this reason - there is still net/gtk-gnutella in the ports tree. The project is still active but the version we ship is 10 years old. There is even a warning about that when you start it :) Charlène.
