Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
Thanks guys, and I am on amd64 as you guessed correctly. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/03/21 07:48, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have >> to wait for upgraded packages. > > i386 packages are likely to be new enough already; new amd64 > packages are on the way out now. > >
Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
On 2011/03/21 07:48, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have > to wait for upgraded packages. i386 packages are likely to be new enough already; new amd64 packages are on the way out now.
Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, 08:48:19 EDT, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have > to wait for upgraded packages. I know you guys doing a lot of upgrades > and testing various things out (groff, rc_scripts, wprintf's etc). > Hope it comes out this week. You're expected to be able to build the dependencies from ports. FF4 will probably be in the tree before new packages are up. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
Too much library problems. I tried to install rc2 yesterday. We have to wait for upgraded packages. I know you guys doing a lot of upgrades and testing various things out (groff, rc_scripts, wprintf's etc). Hope it comes out this week. Thanks On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:15:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:57:53PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:47:26AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Please test in various use cases. If it crashes where 3.6 didn't >> > > > > crash >> > > > > before, build it with debug FLAVOR and try to report a useful trace >> > > > > _upstream_ (as in http://bugzilla.mozilla.org, i wont handle >> > > > > everything) >> > > > > >> > > > > get the port in my git repo (you'll need a -current portstree ofc, >> > > > > and >> > > > > probably bumped ulimit -d if building as user) : >> > > > > >> > > > > cd /usr/ports/mystuff/www/ >> > > > > git clone -b firefox-4 http://rhaalovely.net/git/mozilla-firefox/ >> > > > > cd mozilla-firefox && make install clean >> > > > >> > > > git repo is now at ffx 4.0b9, released two days ago : >> > > > http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0b9/releasenotes/ >> > > Oh, btw there's been rc1, and here's rc2. > > http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0rc2/releasenotes/ > >> > > > > or try those packages (built against somewhat -current, don't come >> > > > > crying >> > > > > if it doesn't install on your box due to dependencies not matching) : > > Packages: > http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/mozilla-firefox-4.0rc2.tgz > http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/mozilla-firefox-4.0rc2.tgz > > Note that bundled firefox sync is supposed to work, i tried it slightly and it > sometimes choked. I have patchsets to make it build on sparc64, but it > won't work, and the issues are deep in typing system. I'm afraid sparc64 > will have to be taken out of the working archs for a while.. we're > working on the fixes with opensolaris/debian/other bsds maintainers. > > 4.0 final is scheduled for tomorrow. > > Landry > >
Re: call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:58:35 +0100 Landry Breuil wrote: > Oh, btw there's been rc1, and here's rc2. Works fine for me on amd64. Been running rc2 since yesterday and rc1 before that.
call for testing: firefox 4.0rc2
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:15:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:57:53PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:47:26AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please test in various use cases. If it crashes where 3.6 didn't crash > > > > > before, build it with debug FLAVOR and try to report a useful trace > > > > > _upstream_ (as in http://bugzilla.mozilla.org, i wont handle > > > > > everything) > > > > > > > > > > get the port in my git repo (you'll need a -current portstree ofc, and > > > > > probably bumped ulimit -d if building as user) : > > > > > > > > > > cd /usr/ports/mystuff/www/ > > > > > git clone -b firefox-4 http://rhaalovely.net/git/mozilla-firefox/ > > > > > cd mozilla-firefox && make install clean > > > > > > > > git repo is now at ffx 4.0b9, released two days ago : > > > > http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0b9/releasenotes/ > Oh, btw there's been rc1, and here's rc2. http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/4.0rc2/releasenotes/ > > > > > or try those packages (built against somewhat -current, don't come > > > > > crying > > > > > if it doesn't install on your box due to dependencies not matching) : Packages: http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/i386/mozilla-firefox-4.0rc2.tgz http://rhaalovely.net/stuff/amd64/mozilla-firefox-4.0rc2.tgz Note that bundled firefox sync is supposed to work, i tried it slightly and it sometimes choked. I have patchsets to make it build on sparc64, but it won't work, and the issues are deep in typing system. I'm afraid sparc64 will have to be taken out of the working archs for a while.. we're working on the fixes with opensolaris/debian/other bsds maintainers. 4.0 final is scheduled for tomorrow. Landry
