centericq

2005-11-23 Thread frantisek holop
hi there,

i've just upgraded my production server to 3.8
and i see now, that centericq is marked broken..

until the issue is fixed, could the old version be put back?
4.9.11 worked fine for me.

i see in the archives that at least one person had problems
with that one on bsd.mp [1], is this the reason the old one is
not available anymore?

[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-ports&m=108905590126204&w=2

-f
-- 
lie: a very poor substitute for the truth



Update: Centericq

2005-08-05 Thread Leonardo B. Cuquejo (Arachnius)

Hi!

I'm trying build a port of centericq-4.20, the port works fine, on build 
everything work, configure, make build the binary but when I run 
centericq command have CoreDump error.


The GDB outputs:
Starting program: 
/usr/ports/net/centericq/w-centericq-4.20.0/fake-i386/usr/loca

l/bin/centericq

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1c3d640d in SHA1Final ()

Can anyone helpme :) I only know the basics of basics c programing :)

OBS: Sorry about the english  :D



Re: centericq

2005-11-23 Thread Peter Valchev
> i've just upgraded my production server to 3.8
> and i see now, that centericq is marked broken..
> 
> until the issue is fixed, could the old version be put back?

why don't you ask the author to fix it for example?

the old version had more than one issue and that's not going
to change.  you can remove the BROKEN line and you're on your
own...



Re: centericq

2005-11-24 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:08:49PM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
> > i've just upgraded my production server to 3.8
> > and i see now, that centericq is marked broken..
> > 
> > until the issue is fixed, could the old version be put back?
> 
> why don't you ask the author to fix it for example?
> 
> the old version had more than one issue and that's not going
> to change.  you can remove the BROKEN line and you're on your
> own...

what is the problem with the new version?  i can't find anything
in the archives except that one case.

so i did a compile of the 4.9.11p0, i was using 4.9.11 before.
it was acting strangely..  some of my contacts just wouldn't
open with their history.

so, i downloaded the newest, compiled with --without-msn (no curl here)
and so far it's good.  what's the issue i should be looking for?

-f
-- 
this message written by sandy.  a highly trained dolphin.



Re: centericq

2005-11-24 Thread Peter Valchev
> so, i downloaded the newest, compiled with --without-msn (no curl here)
> and so far it's good.  what's the issue i should be looking for?

You precisely avoided the problem as it's in the msn code, I've
the diff --without-msn in my tree but I was hoping it would get
fixed.  Ignoring it's broken won't do that, spending some time or
submitting a bug report to the author will.



Re: centericq

2005-11-24 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:13:30AM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
> > so, i downloaded the newest, compiled with --without-msn (no curl here)
> > and so far it's good.  what's the issue i should be looking for?
> 
> You precisely avoided the problem as it's in the msn code, I've
> the diff --without-msn in my tree but I was hoping it would get
> fixed.  Ignoring it's broken won't do that, spending some time or
> submitting a bug report to the author will.

i feel your pain.
but i have never used msn and don't plan to.

is there some more info about this flaw somewhere?
i would gladly write the author if i knew what's the deal.
i presume it's openbsd specific if the code is released
and noone else complains?

or just telling the author that having msn compiled in
the program core dumps on openbsd?

-f
-- 
you're old when you forget how to start your rocking chair.



Re: centericq

2005-11-24 Thread Edd Barrett
On 24/11/05, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:13:30AM -0700, Peter Valchev said that
> > > so, i downloaded the newest, compiled with --without-msn (no curl here)
> > > and so far it's good.  what's the issue i should be looking for?
> >
> > You precisely avoided the problem as it's in the msn code, I've
> > the diff --without-msn in my tree but I was hoping it would get
> > fixed.  Ignoring it's broken won't do that, spending some time or
> > submitting a bug report to the author will.
>
> i feel your pain.
> but i have never used msn and don't plan to.
>
> is there some more info about this flaw somewhere?
> i would gladly write the author if i knew what's the deal.
> i presume it's openbsd specific if the code is released
> and noone else complains?
>
> or just telling the author that having msn compiled in
> the program core dumps on openbsd?
>
> -f
> --
> you're old when you forget how to start your rocking chair.
>
>

Yes this annoyed me also. MSN is pretty much the only protocol used in
the uk. Why I dont know. Has anyome actually emailed the author?

Regards

Edd



Re: Update: Centericq

2005-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Leonardo B. Cuquejo (Arachnius) dixit:

> Hi!
>
> I'm trying build a port of centericq-4.20, the port works fine, on build
> everything work, configure, make build the binary but when I run centericq
> command have CoreDump error.
>
> The GDB outputs:
> Starting program:
> /usr/ports/net/centericq/w-centericq-4.20.0/fake-i386/usr/loca
> l/bin/centericq
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

--disable-msn

> 0x1c3d640d in SHA1Final ()

oO that'd explain why MSN doesn't work even if you
fix the former error...

//mirabile
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.  -- Coywolf Qi Hunt



net/centericq replacement?

2008-02-04 Thread viq
There's a for of centericq called centerim, http://www.centerim.org -
did anyone look at it? Maybe it's less broken than centericq...
-- 
viq



Re: net/centericq replacement?

2008-02-16 Thread Giovanni Bechis

viq wrote:

There's a for of centericq called centerim, http://www.centerim.org -
did anyone look at it? Maybe it's less broken than centericq...

I am looking at it
 Cheers
  Giovanni



net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-26 Thread Alexander Belikov
Hi everybody!

Centericq port is frozen for 8 month. I've successfuly compiled latest
centericq-4.21.0 for now. It's working. So, i've "minimaly" updated
port for this version. MSN support is disabled now, because it needs
net/curl. I've not tested it yet.

I hope you'll find it useful and place it into OpenBSD's ports tree


centericq.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-27 Thread Alexander Belikov
Hi everybody!

Centericq port is frozen for 8 month. I've successfuly compiled latest
centericq-4.21.0 for now. It's working. So, i've "minimaly" updated
port for this version. MSN support is disabled now, because it needs
net/curl. I've not tested it yet.

I hope you'll find it useful and place it into OpenBSD's ports tree

centericq.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Re: net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Alexander Belikov dixit:

>MSN support is disabled now, because it needs

gcc 3.4, believe me. Otherwise, it just segfaults.
Even with the patch from
http://centericq.de/archive/contrib/patches/centericq-4.21.0.msn.patch

//mirabile
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.  -- Coywolf Qi Hunt



Re: net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-26 Thread Peter Valchev
> >MSN support is disabled now, because it needs
> 
> gcc 3.4, believe me. Otherwise, it just segfaults.
> Even with the patch from
> http://centericq.de/archive/contrib/patches/centericq-4.21.0.msn.patch

I have tried to fix this but failed; unfortunately the author has failed
to take it seriously as well.

This update also suffers from the fact that it does not detect the
installed libiconv/libintl (which is listed as dependency) and builds
its own copy - that must be fixed.



Re: net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-28 Thread Alexander Belikov
>> >MSN support is disabled now, because it needs
>> 
>> gcc 3.4, believe me. Otherwise, it just segfaults.
>> Even with the patch from
>> http://centericq.de/archive/contrib/patches/centericq-4.21.0.msn.patch

PV> I have tried to fix this but failed; unfortunately the author has failed
PV> to take it seriously as well.

PV> This update also suffers from the fact that it does not detect the
PV> installed libiconv/libintl (which is listed as dependency) and builds
PV> its own copy - that must be fixed.

I tried to fix configure thus it could find installed libiconv and
libintl. It's still not fixed. But centericq works using it's own
copies. I think we can update port to 4.21.0 without MSN support. I'm
using centericq build such way and I don't have any problems. I have
LC_ALL LANG and MM_CHARSET variables which are set to ru_RU.KOI8-R and
everything is displayed correctly.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: net/centericq port update to 4.21.0

2006-03-28 Thread Peter Valchev
> PV> I have tried to fix this but failed; unfortunately the author has failed
> PV> to take it seriously as well.
> 
> PV> This update also suffers from the fact that it does not detect the
> PV> installed libiconv/libintl (which is listed as dependency) and builds
> PV> its own copy - that must be fixed.
> 
> I tried to fix configure thus it could find installed libiconv and
> libintl. It's still not fixed. But centericq works using it's own
> copies. 

Sorry, just because "it works", doesn't mean it's correct or that
it'll be accepted - it won't.  This is a problem and must be fixed
first by someone (yes it's stupid, I've looked at it briefly and
the configure script is totally broken).