Re: ports softlock
Hi, Some post if up-to-date packages are available for the not so common archs would be nice. Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks! I am currently building OpenBSD -current for sparc64 and also some(!) packages (only what I need) for my main server. If you want to use them I could provide a download link once I've uploaded them. In case you need anything else that isn't too big, I might consider building those packages too. With some luck I'll be able to start the upload tonight. Michael
Re: ports softlock
Some post if up-to-date packages are available for the not so common archs would be nice. Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks! I am currently building OpenBSD -current for sparc64 and also some(!) packages (only what I need) for my main server. If you want to use them I could provide a download link once I've uploaded them. In case you need anything else that isn't too big, I might consider building those packages too. With some luck I'll be able to start the upload tonight. http://openbsd.lechtermann.net/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/
Re: ports softlock
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:04:49PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: The ports tree is now soft locked. What this means is that we are in release mode, and new ports/updates will now stop except for very important cases. Everything has to be approved by me, naddy, espie or ajacoutot. If you have something you deem will make 4.7 better, talk to us. This is what the next week or so will be about! Now is the time to start focusing on testing packages and trying to find subtle breakages. Please update your machines to -current and everyone can help out! Some post if up-to-date packages are available for the not so common archs would be nice. Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks! Regards, Markus
Re: ports softlock
* Markus Lude [2010-01-19]: Packages for sparc64 are somewhat old. Thanks! These are due to hardware problems, we are working on it. Nikolay -- It's all part of my Can't-Do approach to life. Wally
Re: ports softlock
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:04:37AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote: So none of the Tcl stuff from the past couple of months is going in? The approval group noted above doesn't give me the impression of being too excited about Tcl. Lack of time from my part as well. I have noticed your work, but as you can see, I have done about nothing in the ports tree proper over the past release, I've spent most of my time working on pkg_add instead. The current goal is to stabilize things and have a release. The sooner it's done, the better to start a new cycle, and for the Tcl stuff to go in. ;-) Any of p5-Catalyst-* updated to latest version? I'm working (and testing) on p5-Catalyst-Runtime 5.80018, p5-Catalyst-Devel etc... It will be great to find them into 4.7 -rel Any comments? (jim@ / simon@ ?) Saluti, Cesare.
Re: ports softlock
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58:56PM +0100, Cesare Gargano wrote: Any of p5-Catalyst-* updated to latest version? I'm working (and testing) on p5-Catalyst-Runtime 5.80018, p5-Catalyst-Devel etc... It will be great to find them into 4.7 -rel Any comments? (jim@ / simon@ ?) Saluti, Cesare. Unless there's a showstopper in what currently is in-tree, don't expect miracles. I know, Catalyst is simple, nothing will break... well, multiply that by 7000 ports, and you have a size problem.
Re: ports softlock
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote: So none of the Tcl stuff from the past couple of months is going in? The approval group noted above doesn't give me the impression of being too excited about Tcl. Lack of time from my part as well. I have noticed your work, but as you can see, I have done about nothing in the ports tree proper over the past release, I've spent most of my time working on pkg_add instead. The current goal is to stabilize things and have a release. The sooner it's done, the better to start a new cycle, and for the Tcl stuff to go in. ;-)
ports softlock
The ports tree is now soft locked. What this means is that we are in release mode, and new ports/updates will now stop except for very important cases. Everything has to be approved by me, naddy, espie or ajacoutot. If you have something you deem will make 4.7 better, talk to us. This is what the next week or so will be about! Now is the time to start focusing on testing packages and trying to find subtle breakages. Please update your machines to -current and everyone can help out! -- Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the texture of the situation at hand -- Francisco Varela
Re: ports softlock
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: The ports tree is now soft locked. What this means is that we are in release mode, and new ports/updates will now stop except for very important cases. Everything has to be approved by me, naddy, espie or ajacoutot. If you have something you deem will make 4.7 better, talk to us. This is what the next week or so will be about! Now is the time to start focusing on testing packages and trying to find subtle breakages. Please update your machines to -current and everyone can help out! So none of the Tcl stuff from the past couple of months is going in? The approval group noted above doesn't give me the impression of being too excited about Tcl. Stu
Re: ports softlock
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:55:04PM -0500, Stuart Cassoff wrote: Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: The ports tree is now soft locked. What this means is that we are in release mode, and new ports/updates will now stop except for very important cases. Everything has to be approved by me, naddy, espie or ajacoutot. If you have something you deem will make 4.7 better, talk to us. This is what the next week or so will be about! Now is the time to start focusing on testing packages and trying to find subtle breakages. Please update your machines to -current and everyone can help out! So none of the Tcl stuff from the past couple of months is going in? The approval group noted above doesn't give me the impression of being too excited about Tcl. Stu hi, to make one thing clear, we (or at least i) do appreciate the time and effort you put into tcl in our tree. i speak for myself when i say that's it's not out a lack of intrest or willingness, it's purely a lack of time. unless you have a very critical diff pending; nothing will go into 4.7. after 4.7 has been tagged, please remind me, landry and sthen to review your work, we'd be happy to. cheers, jasper Ok, I'm cool with that, thanks. Stu
Re: ports softlock
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Stuart Cassoff wrote: to make one thing clear, we (or at least i) do appreciate the time and effort you put into tcl in our tree. i speak for myself when i say that's it's not out a lack of intrest or willingness, it's purely a lack of time. unless you have a very critical diff pending; nothing will go into 4.7. after 4.7 has been tagged, please remind me, landry and sthen to review your work, we'd be happy to. I second that. -- Antoine
