Re: Multi-Instance-Questions
Hi Stan, thanks a lot for your eMail und sorry for the inconvenience. Here is the hundred feet back down big picture: :-) Postfix 2.5 on ubuntu 8.04.4. One physical interface with two public IPs. eth0 - 10.0.0.1 - needs relay (with auth) for abc.com, def.com, ghi.com to myIp.dyndns.org eth0 - 10.0.0.2 - needs relay (with auth) for * (all) to wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de (runs later on localhost only, therefore no open relay) I currently have: master.cf: smtp inet n - - - - smtpd - uses main.cf if think 127.0.0.1:25inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25] -o smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o smtp_sasl_password_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_gr_smarthost -o relayhost=wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25 main.cf: myhostname = mx0.mydomain.com myorigin = $myhostname mydestination = relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/transport relayhost = myIp.dnsalias.org transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/valid_recipients virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_recipients ##postmap hash:/etc/postfix/... show_user_unknown_table_name = no mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 inet_protocols = all inet_interfaces = 10.0.0.1 parent_domain_matches_subdomains = debug_peer_list, smtpd_access_maps smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain unknown_address_reject_code = 554 Is this setup possible with postfix? Thanks a lot in advance! Thomas On 9/25/2011 7:25 AM, Thomas Trepper wrote: Hi Wietse, I tried your solution with the content-filter option and I have the following in master.cf: 127.0.0.1:25inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25] No. I believe you need this, just as Wietse told you: 10.0.0.1:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de] Delete all of the other overrides you put in there and give it a go. AIUI this creates a straight shot between mail arriving on 10.0.0.1 and wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de, so you don't need, nor want, any other overrides trying to muck this up. and in this file (/etc/postfix/sasl_gr_smarthost) you see wp180.webpack.hosteurope.deuser password Now you throw a previously unmentioned fly in the ointment... Until now you had not mentioned you need auth to connect to the downstream hosts you're relaying to. This is a very odd setup. Maybe you should back up a few hundred feet and give us the big picture of what exactly you're trying to accomplish here. -- Stan
Re: Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist.
Noel Jones: On 9/26/2011 3:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Randy Ramsdell: /etc/postfix/virtual: #f...@example.com stays itself. f...@example.com f...@example.com #b...@example.com goes elsewhere. b...@example.com other@elsewhere /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre: # Everything else goes to the mailsink. /./ mails...@example.net ? Plus the portion of my example that you left out, and that lists the PCRE file last in the virtual_alias_maps settings. Wietse But don't we need an identity 1-1 mapping in the hash file for other@elsewhere so the pcre /./ catchall doesn't rewrite it also? I suppose it does. No 1-1 mapping is needed for mails...@example.net. (I started from an example that wild-carded @example.com not /./). Wietse
smtp_bind_address dynamic
Hi to all, i need to set smtp_bind_address dynamically with a query in mysql table but it dowesn't work. Is it possible with another parameter? thanks -- Ing. Antonio Tommasi Area Informatica Area Infrastrutture - Servizio Posta Elettronica Università del Salento - Lecce tel. 0832 297373-7302-7535 e-mail: antonio.tomm...@unisalento.it Messaggio automatico istituzionale del sistema non eliminabile e che non interpreta necessariamente la volonta' del mittente: Il futuro della Ricerca Scientifica ha bisogno del tuo aiuto. Dona il 5 x mille all'Universita' del Salento - Codice Fiscale: 80008870752
Re: smtp_bind_address dynamic
Antonio Tommasi: Hi to all, i need to set smtp_bind_address dynamically with a query in mysql table but it dowesn't work. The following may come as a surprise. The smtp_bind_address feature works exactly as documented at http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address. Is it possible with another parameter? See RELEASE_NOTES-2.7 (the Postfix 2.7 release notes). The section titled sender reputation describes two approaches. Wietse
Re: Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist.
On 09/26/11 16:12, Wietse Venema wrote: Randy Ramsdell: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] On 09/26/11 14:36, Noel Jones wrote: On 9/26/2011 1:31 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: On 09/26/11 14:18, Noel Jones wrote: On 9/26/2011 1:00 PM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: On 09/22/11 13:45, Randy Ramsdell wrote: I cannot find the the way to grab all to's rewritten to go to a single to:. We need to send all mail coming out of our QA environment and send that to a single, probably, local address. The list of senders will be in the thousands and so using a catchall for these has to be configured. We will also select a few to's where we send these off as normal. No external to our network mail we need to be routed. So far I read about transport maps and the address rewriting but don't see a way or the best way to accomplish this. Advice appreciated, Randy Ramsdell When virtual_alias_maps using two maps as suggested. virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre This has order correct ?i.e As in the maps are checked sequentially? The maps are checked sequentially and recursively. Recursion stops when the result is the same as the input key or not found. For this application, you would need 1-1 identity mappings in the hash file, and a catchall in the pcre. -- Noel Jones r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # cat virtual real@madeupdomain rramsdell@nonlocaldomain need to add an identity mapping to the hash file: rramsdell@nonlocaldomain rramsdell@nonlocaldomain r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # cat virtual.pcre /./ itstaff This per Wietse. Debug : Sep 26 13:54:43 mail1-test postfix/smtpd[6842]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: hash:/etc/postfix/virtual(0,lock|fold_fix): real@madeupdomain = rramsdell@nonlocaldomain . . . Sep 26 13:54:53 mail1-test postfix/local[6848]: C311517A7BF: to=itst...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn, orig_to=real@madeupdomain, relay=local, delay=19, delays=19/0/0/0.05, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) This looks like it matches virtual and then applies the pcre virtual. Yes, that's what recursion does. -- Noel Jones /etc/postfix/virtual: #f...@example.com stays itself. f...@example.com f...@example.com #b...@example.com goes elsewhere. b...@example.com other@elsewhere /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre: # Everything else goes to the mailsink. /./ mails...@example.net ? Plus the portion of my example that you left out, and that lists the PCRE file last in the virtual_alias_maps settings. Wietse virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre Has been this way since I started with your example.
Re: redirect all except whitelisted ?
that works fine - thanks . Ideally we wouldnt want the REDIRECT affecting all recipients on the message, but from the access() man page it looks as if this is a feature of REDIRECT so I guess we have to live with it ? - is there any way around this ? ( i.e. deliver a copy to the whitelisted recipients, plus a copy to the 'mailsink' address ) - Original Message - From: Robin Sinclair para...@360.com To: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Monday, 26 September, 2011 16:44:36 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: redirect all except whitelisted ? thanks for the example Noel - that sounds promising, I shall give that a go. P.S. I appreciate your nitpick too - I had seen that the access() manpage states order isnt important so was confused by the previous suggestion. /^foo1@example\.org$/ dunno /^foo2@example\.org$/ dunno /./ REDIRECT b...@example.org
Re: redirect all except whitelisted ?
On 9/27/2011 8:12 AM, Robin Sinclair wrote: that works fine - thanks . Ideally we wouldnt want the REDIRECT affecting all recipients on the message, but from the access() man page it looks as if this is a feature of REDIRECT so I guess we have to live with it ? - is there any way around this ? ( i.e. deliver a copy to the whitelisted recipients, plus a copy to the 'mailsink' address ) Rather than an access map, you can use virtual_alias_maps as discussed in the parallel thread Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist. That allows delivery to the whitelisted users, all other recipients rewritten to the mailsink. -- Noel Jones
Re: redirect all except whitelisted ?
P.S Just noticed that Randy ramsdell's thread Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist is pretty much the same question as I'm asking, I shall play around with that approach too : ( virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre - Original Message - From: Robin Sinclair para...@360.com To: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Tuesday, 27 September, 2011 14:12:30 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: redirect all except whitelisted ? that works fine - thanks . Ideally we wouldnt want the REDIRECT affecting all recipients on the message, but from the access() man page it looks as if this is a feature of REDIRECT so I guess we have to live with it ? - is there any way around this ? ( i.e. deliver a copy to the whitelisted recipients, plus a copy to the 'mailsink' address ) - Original Message - From: Robin Sinclair para...@360.com To: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Monday, 26 September, 2011 16:44:36 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: redirect all except whitelisted ? thanks for the example Noel - that sounds promising, I shall give that a go. P.S. I appreciate your nitpick too - I had seen that the access() manpage states order isnt important so was confused by the previous suggestion. /^foo1@example\.org$/ dunno /^foo2@example\.org$/ dunno /./ REDIRECT b...@example.org
Re: Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist.
On 9/27/2011 8:03 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: /etc/postfix/virtual: #f...@example.com stays itself. f...@example.comf...@example.com #b...@example.com goes elsewhere. b...@example.comother@elsewhere /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre: # Everything else goes to the mailsink. /./mails...@example.net ? Plus the portion of my example that you left out, and that lists the PCRE file last in the virtual_alias_maps settings. Wietse virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre Has been this way since I started with your example. When you have a /./ catchall, you need an identity mapping in the hash file for every user to keep the catchall from grabbing it. In your example above, you would add other@elsewhere other@elsewhere to your hash file. Wietse's examples started out with just aliasing @example.com and not the whole world. In the case of aliasing only @example.com, no identity mapping would be needed for @elsewhere as it wouldn't match the domain wildcard. But you're using a global wildcard, not just a domain wildcard. -- Noel Jones
Postscreen Blacklist
Hello i created an etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr in my postfix dir. now postscreen checks on connect for the entries. i set one server in the list with reject Is it right, that the test mail goes thru postfix? i see in logs : Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: CONNECT from [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: BLACKLISTED [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: PASS OLD [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 do i have to clear any special cache before to test if 78.46.56.1xx gets blocked? marko
Re: Postscreen Blacklist
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 09:52:16 Marko Weber wrote: Hello i created an etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr in my postfix dir. now postscreen checks on connect for the entries. i set one server in the list with reject Is it right, that the test mail goes thru postfix? i see in logs : Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: CONNECT from [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: BLACKLISTED [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: PASS OLD [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 do i have to clear any special cache before to test if 78.46.56.1xx gets blocked? http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#perm_white_black http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_blacklist_action The latter says: postscreen_blacklist_action (default: ignore) -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless /dev/rob0 or not-spam is in Subject: header
Re: Postscreen Blacklist
Thanks rob0, when i set postscreen_blacklist_action = drop all works like a charm. marko, from sunny hamburg Am 27.09.2011 17:08, schrieb /dev/rob0: On Tuesday 27 September 2011 09:52:16 Marko Weber wrote: Hello i created an etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr in my postfix dir. now postscreen checks on connect for the entries. i set one server in the list with reject Is it right, that the test mail goes thru postfix? i see in logs : Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: CONNECT from [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: BLACKLISTED [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 Sep 27 16:43:30 netcogw postfix/postscreen[15206]: PASS OLD [78.46.56.1xx]:31558 do i have to clear any special cache before to test if 78.46.56.1xx gets blocked? http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#perm_white_black http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_blacklist_action The latter says: postscreen_blacklist_action (default: ignore)
automatic message
Hi all, I want to configure postfix to reply automatically for specific e-mail address. I googled that but I found that I must have another software (vacation) that handles this issue. I am using postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 and using virtual domains. I am not using MySQL I use regular files for dovecot authentication. Any suggestions about configuring automatic message using postfix. Regards
Re: Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist.
On 09/27/11 09:33, Noel Jones wrote: On 9/27/2011 8:03 AM, Randy Ramsdell wrote: /etc/postfix/virtual: #f...@example.com stays itself. f...@example.comf...@example.com #b...@example.com goes elsewhere. b...@example.comother@elsewhere /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre: # Everything else goes to the mailsink. /./mails...@example.net ? Plus the portion of my example that you left out, and that lists the PCRE file last in the virtual_alias_maps settings. Wietse virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre Has been this way since I started with your example. When you have a /./ catchall, you need an identity mapping in the hash file for every user to keep the catchall from grabbing it. In your example above, you would add other@elsewhere other@elsewhere to your hash file. Wietse's examples started out with just aliasing @example.com and not the whole world. In the case of aliasing only @example.com, no identity mapping would be needed for @elsewhere as it wouldn't match the domain wildcard. But you're using a global wildcard, not just a domain wildcard. -- Noel Jones Okay. Tried so many iterations of this also had another person try without success. CONFIGS: r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # cat virtual r...@mail1.dfb.qa.vnrramsdell@elsewhere r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # cat virtual.pcre /rramsdell\@elsewhere/ rramsdell@elsewhere /./ itstaff r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # cat main.cf | grep virtual.pcre virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre TESTING r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # telnet 192.168.21.31 25 Trying 192.168.21.31... Connected to 192.168.21.31. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail1.dfb.qa.vn ESMTP Postfix helo rramsdell 250 mail1.dfb.qa.vn mail from: rramsd...@elsewhere.com 250 2.1.0 Ok rcpt to: r...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn 250 2.1.5 Ok data 354 End data with CRLF.CRLF . 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 6252A17A809 RESULT Sep 27 12:25:38 mail1-test postfix/smtpd[16575]: 6252A17A809: client=mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn[192.168.21.31] Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/cleanup[16592]: 6252A17A809: message-id=20110927162538.6252a17a...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/qmgr[16563]: 6252A17A809: from=rramsdell@elsewhere, size=352, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/error[16593]: 6252A17A809: to=rramsdell@elsewhere, orig_to=r...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn, relay=none, delay=25, delays=25/0/0/0.03, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table) Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/cleanup[16592]: A556C17A810: message-id=20110927162542.a556c17a...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/qmgr[16563]: A556C17A810: from=, size=2208, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/bounce[16594]: 6252A17A809: sender non-delivery notification: A556C17A810 Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/qmgr[16563]: 6252A17A809: removed Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/error[16593]: A556C17A810: to=rramsdell@elsewhere, relay=none, delay=0.06, delays=0.03/0/0/0.03, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table) Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/qmgr[16563]: A556C17A810: removed POSTCONF r...@mail1-test.dfb.qa.vn:/etc/postfix # postconf -n biff = no command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix content_filter = daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 defer_transports = delay_warning_time = 1h disable_dns_lookups = no disable_mime_output_conversion = no home_mailbox = Maildir/ html_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix-doc/html inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = all mail_owner = postfix mail_spool_directory = /var/mail mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 mailbox_transport = mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq manpage_directory = /usr/share/man masquerade_classes = envelope_sender, header_sender, header_recipient masquerade_domains = masquerade_exceptions = root message_size_limit = 0 message_strip_characters = \0 mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain myhostname = mail1.dfb.qa.vn mynetworks = 192.168.21.0/24 127.0.0.0/8 mynetworks_style = subnet newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix-doc/README_FILES relocated_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relocated sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix-doc/samples sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail setgid_group = maildrop smtp_enforce_tls = no smtp_sasl_auth_enable = no smtp_use_tls = no smtpd_client_restrictions = smtpd_helo_required = no smtpd_helo_restrictions = smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access smtpd_use_tls = no strict_8bitmime = no
Re: redirect all except whitelisted ?
thanks - that did the trick :-)
I was also able to whitelist whole domains using the parentheses/matching
technique.
Here's my final config, in case its useful for Randy or others:
/etc/postfix/virtual :
# 1. whitelisted individuals:
r...@hotmail.com r...@hotmail.com
# 2. whitelisted domains
/(.*)@foobar.com$/ ${1}@foobar.com
/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre :
/./ mails...@example.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual.pcre
Rather than an access map, you can use virtual_alias_maps as
discussed in the parallel thread Many to one address rewriting,
exceptions exist.
Re: Many to one address rewriting, exceptions exist.
Randy Ramsdell: Sep 27 12:25:42 mail1-test postfix/error[16593]: 6252A17A809: to=rramsdell@elsewhere, orig_to=r...@mail1.dfb.qa.vn, relay=none, delay=25, delays=25/0/0/0.03, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (User unknown in virtual alias table) You need to override the virtual_alias_domains default setting. /etc/postfix/main.cf: virtual_alias_domains = Otherwise, your /./ wildcard will match all domains. virtual_alias_domains requires that the address is rewritten to a different domain, otherwise it reports user unknown in virtual alias table. Wietse
Re: Multi-Instance-Questions
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Thomas Trepper thomas.trep...@blueclaim.com wrote: Hi Stan, thanks a lot for your eMail und sorry for the inconvenience. Here is the hundred feet back down big picture: :-) Postfix 2.5 on ubuntu 8.04.4. One physical interface with two public IPs. eth0 - 10.0.0.1 - needs relay (with auth) for abc.com, def.com, ghi.com to myIp.dyndns.org eth0 - 10.0.0.2 - needs relay (with auth) for * (all) to wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de (runs later on localhost only, therefore no open relay) I currently have: master.cf: smtp inet n - - - - smtpd - uses main.cf if think 127.0.0.1:25 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25] -o smtp_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o smtp_sasl_password_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_gr_smarthost -o relayhost=wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25 main.cf: myhostname = mx0.mydomain.com myorigin = $myhostname mydestination = relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/transport relayhost = myIp.dnsalias.org transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/valid_recipients virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_recipients ##postmap hash:/etc/postfix/... show_user_unknown_table_name = no mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 inet_protocols = all inet_interfaces = 10.0.0.1 parent_domain_matches_subdomains = debug_peer_list, smtpd_access_maps smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks reject_unauth_destination smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain unknown_address_reject_code = 554 Is this setup possible with postfix? Thanks a lot in advance! Thomas On 9/25/2011 7:25 AM, Thomas Trepper wrote: Hi Wietse, I tried your solution with the content-filter option and I have the following in master.cf: 127.0.0.1:25 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de:25] No. I believe you need this, just as Wietse told you: 10.0.0.1:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd -o content_filter=smtp:[wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de] Delete all of the other overrides you put in there and give it a go. AIUI this creates a straight shot between mail arriving on 10.0.0.1 and wp180.webpack.hosteurope.de, so you don't need, nor want, any other overrides trying to muck this up. and in this file (/etc/postfix/sasl_gr_smarthost) you see wp180.webpack.hosteurope.deuser password Now you throw a previously unmentioned fly in the ointment... Until now you had not mentioned you need auth to connect to the downstream hosts you're relaying to. This is a very odd setup. Maybe you should back up a few hundred feet and give us the big picture of what exactly you're trying to accomplish here. -- Stan Thomas, I believe you should use the interface IP (10.0.0.1 or 10.0.0.2) instead of 127.0.0.1 in master.cf, as Stan told you before... Fernando
Re: Multi-Instance-Questions
On 9/27/2011 4:29 AM, Thomas Trepper wrote: Hi Stan, thanks a lot for your eMail und sorry for the inconvenience. Here is the hundred feet back down big picture: :-) snip That's not a big picture. A big picture is something like this: I need to drive my grandmother to the airport, but I don't know how to get there. Can you provide some directions? I'd like to have $400,000 in my 401k by the time I'm 45. I'm 25 now. Can you advise me on the best investments to achieve this goal? Maybe big picture doesn't translate in your native language... -- Stan
Virtual Alias Table
Hi, Trying to add an entry to a virtual alias table and for some reason, I keep getting an error stating the recipient can't be found. lipidnutritxxx.com DOMAIN erik.bakk...@lipidnutritxxx.com erik.bakk...@stexxx.com [snip] # # Temp forwarding for employees not recruited # louis.dede...@lipidnutritxxx.comlouis.dede...@croklxxx.com leslye.mob...@lipidnutritxxx.comleslye.mob...@croklxxx.com- This entry postmas...@lipidnutritxxx.com postmas...@stexxx.com Sep 27 13:38:26 viper postfix/smtpd[3837]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-wy0-f181.google.com[74.125.82.181]: 550 5.1.1 leslye.mob...@lipidnutritxxx.com: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=ajezier...@gmxxx.com to=leslye.mob...@lipidnutritxxx.com proto=ESMTP helo= mail-wy0-f181.google.com Working fine for others in the table. Sep 27 12:56:18 viper postfix/smtp[1424]: 5DBDA73077: to= postmas...@stexxx.com, orig_to=postmas...@lipidnutritxxx.com, relay=172.16.196.63[172.16.196.63]:25, delay=0.01, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (250 postmas...@stexxx.com... Recipient OK) I've done a postmap virtual a postfix reload Anyone see anything that I'm missing? Running version 2.9-20110323 Thanks Andy
Re: Virtual Alias Table
Andy Jezierski: address: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=ajezier...@gmxxx.com This error message means that you need to have a virtual alias that replaces the recipient by an address that is not in a virtual alias domain. Wietse
Re: Virtual Alias Table
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Andy Jezierski: address: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=ajezier...@gmxxx.com This error message means that you need to have a virtual alias that replaces the recipient by an address that is not in a virtual alias domain. Wietse Correct, that's what I'm trying to do. louis.dede...@lipidnutrition.com louis.dede...@croklaan.com This entry works leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com leslye.mob...@croklaan.com - This entry does not work I sent a test message to both recipients, one is rejected, the second is forwarded. But for some reason, this time the recipient address of the undeliverable message is checked for validity at the destination server. But if I send a message to just the undeliverable user it is not. Sep 27 14:52:01 viper postfix/smtpd[5447]: connect from mail-ww0-f47.google.com[74.125.82.47] Sep 27 14:52:02 viper postfix/smtpd[5447]: 3F3B273051: client=mail-ww0-f47.google.com[74.125.82.47] Sep 27 14:52:02 viper postfix/smtpd[5447]: 3F3B273051: reject: RCPT from mail-ww0-f47.google.com[74.125.82.47]: 550 5.1.1 leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=ajezier...@gmail.com to=leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com proto=ESMTP helo=mail-ww0-f47.google.com Sep 27 14:52:02 viper postfix/cleanup[5358]: 3F3B273051: message-id=CAC4UgmBG3igmJqD13eoBQLFyGBsnF-6LWJd+bUEuh=tzdo2...@mail.gmail.com Sep 27 14:52:02 viper spamd[6316]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 48203 Sep 27 14:52:02 viper spamd[6316]: spamd: processing message CAC4UgmBG3igmJqD13eoBQLFyGBsnF-6LWJd+bUEuh=tzdo2...@mail.gmail.com for root:58 Sep 27 14:52:02 viper postfix/smtp[6898]: 5AE7973072: to=leslye.mob...@croklaan.com, orig_to=leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com, relay=mail01.croklaan.com[213.31.33.163]:25, delay=0.58, delays=0/0/0.34/0.24, dsn=2.0.0, status=deliverable (250 leslye.mob...@croklaan.com Recipient OK) Sep 27 14:52:03 viper postfix/qmgr[4793]: 5AE7973072: removed Sep 27 14:52:03 viper spamd[6316]: spamd: clean message (-4.4/5.0) for root:58 in 0.8 seconds, 1423 bytes. Sep 27 14:52:03 viper spamd[6316]: spamd: result: . -4 - BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL scantime=0.8,size=1423,user=root,uid=58,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=48203,mid=CAC4UgmBG3igmJqD13eoBQLFyGBsnF-6LWJd+bUEuh=tzdo2...@mail.gmail.com,bayes=0.00,autolearn=ham,shortcircuit=no Sep 27 14:52:03 viper postfix/qmgr[4793]: 3F3B273051: from=ajezier...@gmail.com, size=1361, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Sep 27 14:52:03 viper postfix/smtpd[5447]: disconnect from mail-ww0-f47.google.com[74.125.82.47] Sep 27 14:52:03 viper spamd[75313]: prefork: child states: III Sep 27 14:52:04 viper postfix/smtp[7370]: 3F3B273051: to=louis.dede...@croklaan.com, orig_to=louis.dede...@lipidnutrition.com, relay=mail01.croklaan.com[213.31.33.163]:25, delay=2.4, delays=1.5/0/0.38/0.5, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 OK: 068590c03...@mail01.croklaan.com) Sep 27 14:52:04 viper postfix/qmgr[4793]: 3F3B273051: removed
Re: Virtual Alias Table
Andy Jezierski: leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com: Recipient address rejected: undeliverable address: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=ajezier...@gmail.com to=leslye.mob...@lipidnutrition.com This means that there is no rule that rewrites this recipient to an address that is not in a virtual alias domain. To debug tables, use the postmap command. postmap -q u...@example.com your-virtual-alias-table To dump (hash or btree) tables: postmap -s your-virtual-alias-table Wietse
postfix and/or amavisd-new duplicating sender_bcc's?
I'm using sender_bcc maps to archive/backup sent mail. Config
extracts below. It does work, but is creating duplicates when mail
is sent from clients other than localhost. IE if I send mail using
mutt on the postfix server machine, no duplicate is created. If
I send mail using Thunderbird on a workstation, there are duplicates
of all sent mail in the gzipped file (eg in ~/Sent_1109.gz). There
is only one copy of the mail in Thunderbird's Sent folder, though.
The Thunderbird/iPhone clients connect using STARTTLS normal
password, mailbox format on server is Maildir with dovecot IMAP SSL
etc.
When I say they're duplicates, I mean that in every respect. All
headers - Message-ID, dates and times, everything.
Any ideas or thoughts? Not sure if it's to do with delivery,
authentication, or something else. I can post more config extracts
if you need/ask.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
...
sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_bcc_pcre
...
/etc/postfix/sender_bcc_pcre:
if !/^(archive.*|copier|fetchmail|root|.+_sent)@ourdomain\.com\.au$/
/^(.+)@ourdomain\.com\.au$/ ${1}_sent@netserv.ourdomain.local
endif
/etc/procmailrc:
...
:0:
* ^X-Original-To:.*_sent@netserv\.ourdomain\.local
| gzip -fc9 ${HOME}/Sent_${DATE}.gz
...
--
Troy Piggins
Re: postfix and/or amavisd-new duplicating sender_bcc's?
Troy Piggins: I'm using sender_bcc maps to archive/backup sent mail. Config extracts below. It does work, but is creating duplicates when mail is sent from clients other than localhost. IE if I send mail using See http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html, and look for the examples with receive_override_options. This workaround is needed before or after the filter. Wietse
