Actually moved to Exim. Exim "just works" and highly configurable.
Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung -------- Message d'origine -------- De : Ove Evensen <o...@outlook.com> Date : 01/06/2013 21:42 (GMT+08:00) A : Cc : postfix-us...@cloud9.net Objet : Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y? I would say keep it as normal. 2.9 and then 2.10. If you can not see the difference between 2.1 and 2.10 you should not use postfix. Period! Regards Ove Jk. Evensen -------- Original message -------- From: Linux Addict <linuxaddi...@gmail.com> Date: 01/06/2013 14:02 (GMT+00:00) To: Len Conrad <lcon...@go2france.com> Cc: postfix-us...@cloud9.net Subject: Re: Is it time for 2.x.y -> x.y? After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;) Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <lcon...@go2france.com> wrote: > At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote: >> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema: >>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it >>> is time to change the release numbering scheme. > > don't dumb postfix down. keep the current numbering style. > > Len > > >
