Re: deal with google mailboxes
on 2019/9/4 19:08, Wietse Venema wrote: To signal domain equivalence, the receiver should use CNAME records or some other explicit mechanism. On 04.09.19 19:23, Wesley Peng wrote: from what I know, MX host should not be CNAME records in DNS zone. No, but you can use name in your e-mail address that is has CNAME record in DNS, e.g. "gmail.example. CNAME gmail.com." -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
Re: deal with google mailboxes
On 5/09/19 12:12 AM, Wesley Peng wrote: Perhaps, but Postfix is not a list manager. Postfix just delivers email to the addresses in the message envelope. If some list servers restrict posts to subscribers, any logic to treat addresses as equivalent would be in the list server, not Postfix, which just delivers the message to the list server. That's easy to understand. thank you. Keep in mind that there is no reason, or need for a MLM to try to see those addresses as equivalent, nor should it. It's up to the user to use the same address, or variant of address to post to the list that they used to sign up with. Google may see multiple variants as equivalent but that does not mean that other servers need do the same. Peter
Re: deal with google mailboxes
viktor, on 2019/9/4 20:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: Perhaps, but Postfix is not a list manager. Postfix just delivers email to the addresses in the message envelope. If some list servers restrict posts to subscribers, any logic to treat addresses as equivalent would be in the list server, not Postfix, which just delivers the message to the list server. That's easy to understand. thank you.
Re: deal with google mailboxes
> On Sep 4, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Wesley Peng wrote: > > Can list server know them and treat them as just one? Perhaps, but Postfix is not a list manager. Postfix just delivers email to the addresses in the message envelope. If some list servers restrict posts to subscribers, any logic to treat addresses as equivalent would be in the list server, not Postfix, which just delivers the message to the list server. -- Viktor.
Re: deal with google mailboxes
Hello on 2019/9/4 19:08, Wietse Venema wrote: To signal domain equivalence, the receiver should use CNAME records or some other explicit mechanism. from what I know, MX host should not be CNAME records in DNS zone. regards.
Re: deal with google mailboxes
Wesley Peng: > Hello, > > As a mailing list server, how does postfix deal with google's mailbox > formats? > > for exmaple, all mailboxes below are indeed the same one: > > usern...@gmail.com > user.n...@gmail.com > usernam...@gmail.com > usern...@googlemail.com > > Can list server know them and treat them as just one? Email RFCs say that the address localpart semantics are defined by the receiver, therefore Postfix does not assume that the following addresses resolve to the same mailbox: usern...@gmail.com usernam...@gmail.com user.n...@gmail.com Postfix also does not assume that the following domains are equivalent. gmail.com googlemail.com To signal domain equivalence, the receiver should use CNAME records or some other explicit mechanism. Wietse
