Re: question on missing binaries after build
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > > However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being > > installed: > > > > posttls-finger > > qmqp-sink > > qmqp-source > > smtp-sink > > smtp-source > > > > Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a > > postfix build? > > These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix > package. They are optional. It is not a question of "worthy", > rather essential, vs. not essential. Additionally, no effort is made to maintain compatibility, unike the rest of Postfix. Wietse
Re: question on missing binaries after build
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being > installed: > > posttls-finger > qmqp-sink > qmqp-source > smtp-sink > smtp-source > > Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a > postfix build? These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix package. They are optional. It is not a question of "worthy", rather essential, vs. not essential. -- Viktor.
Re: question on missing binaries after build
--On Saturday, December 19, 2015 2:40 AM + Viktor Dukhovniwrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being installed: posttls-finger qmqp-sink qmqp-source smtp-sink smtp-source Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a postfix build? These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix package. They are optional. It is not a question of "worthy", rather essential, vs. not essential. Thanks. We received a request to include posttls-finger, so was curious why it wasn't present by default. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Platform Architect Zimbra, Inc. Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration