Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
Ralf Hildebrandt schrieb: > smtpd_mumble_restrictions = hash:/foo > is equivalent to: > smtpd_mumble_restrictions = check_mumble_access hash:/foo Oh dear. :-/ Thanks for your time and your support! Kind regards, -martin -- Martin Schmitt - Schmitt Systemberatung - http://www.scsy.de DE 35415 Pohlheim, Gießener Str. 18 DE 65307 Bad Schwalbach, Am Bräunchesberg 9 Linux/UNIX - Internet - E-Mail Infrastructure - Antispam/Antivirus - "What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator." - signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
* Martin Schmitt (Schmitt Systemberatung) : > But still: > > smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/clients > > Is this valid configuration syntax? According to what part of the docs? It's deprecated. I complain about this once in a while here and am being ignored (more or less) :) It's equivalent to: smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/clients smtpd_mumble_restrictions = hash:/foo is equivalent to: smtpd_mumble_restrictions = check_mumble_access hash:/foo -- Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de Die kuerzesten Computerwitze: 1) Muesste laufen.
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
Ralf Hildebrandt schrieb: > * Martin Schmitt (Schmitt Systemberatung) : > >> smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/clients > > What about this one? This points into the right direction: 192.168.1 HOLD 127 HOLD Thanks for that. But still: smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/clients Is this valid configuration syntax? According to what part of the docs? I have never seen anything like this before. -martin -- Martin Schmitt - Schmitt Systemberatung - http://www.scsy.de DE 35415 Pohlheim, Gießener Str. 18 DE 65307 Bad Schwalbach, Am Bräunchesberg 9 Linux/UNIX - Internet - E-Mail Infrastructure - Antispam/Antivirus - "What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator." - signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
* Martin Schmitt (Schmitt Systemberatung) : > My current theory is that this might not be the configuration of the > running postfix instance. What does the log say when a mail is being held? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de good morning scum
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
* Martin Schmitt (Schmitt Systemberatung) : > My current theory is that this might not be the configuration of the > running postfix instance. :) -- Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de A C program is like a fast dance on a newly waxed dance floor by people carrying razors." -- Waldi Ravens.
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
Ralf Hildebrandt schrieb: >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination >> smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access > > check master.cf? I've already done that. master.cf does not contain any smtpd clones or -o options. >> transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > What's in here? The file is empty. My current theory is that this might not be the configuration of the running postfix instance. -martin -- Martin Schmitt - Schmitt Systemberatung - http://www.scsy.de DE 35415 Pohlheim, Gießener Str. 18 DE 65307 Bad Schwalbach, Am Bräunchesberg 9 Linux/UNIX - Internet - E-Mail Infrastructure - Antispam/Antivirus - "What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator." - signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
* Martin Schmitt (Schmitt Systemberatung) : > Hi all! > > I'm confronted with a legacy system (/etc/postfix has not received any > edits since 2006, current uptime is 150 days) that looks like this: > > # grep -v '^#' /etc/postfix/access > 0.0.0.0/0 HOLD > > # postconf -n | grep access > smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access That's wrong, since "0.0.0.0/0" is CIDR format and it's not a sender. > All incoming mail gets put on hold, as intended. I wonder how this can work. > Everything about this seems to be wrong: The CIDR notation in "access", > the smtpd_sender_restrictions and the fact that the client match appears > to be done in the sender context. Yes. I'm intrigued. > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination > smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access check master.cf? > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport What's in here? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) snick...@charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http://www.arschkrebs.de I have never left my schooling interfere with my education. - Mark Twain
Strange behaviour of smtpd_mumble_restrictions
Hi all! I'm confronted with a legacy system (/etc/postfix has not received any edits since 2006, current uptime is 150 days) that looks like this: # grep -v '^#' /etc/postfix/access 0.0.0.0/0 HOLD # postconf -n | grep access smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access # postconf mail_version mail_version = 2.1.1 OS is SLES9. All incoming mail gets put on hold, as intended. Everything about this seems to be wrong: The CIDR notation in "access", the smtpd_sender_restrictions and the fact that the client match appears to be done in the sender context. postconf -n output is below. Can anyone on the list share an insight as to why holding of all mail works in this configuration? Thanks all, -martin alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix content_filter = daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 defer_transports = disable_dns_lookups = no html_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix/html inet_interfaces = 127.0.0.1, x.x.x.50 mail_owner = postfix mail_spool_directory = /var/mail mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 mailbox_transport = mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq manpage_directory = /usr/share/man masquerade_classes = envelope_sender, header_sender, header_recipient masquerade_domains = masquerade_exceptions = root message_size_limit = 1024 mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain myhostname = .example.com mynetworks = x.x.x.0/24, 127.0.0.1/8 newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix/README_FILES relayhost = relocated_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relocated sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/packages/postfix/samples sender_canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_canonical sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail setgid_group = maildrop smtp_sasl_auth_enable = no smtp_use_tls = no smtpd_client_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/clients smtpd_helo_required = no smtpd_helo_restrictions = smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/access smtpd_use_tls = no strict_rfc821_envelopes = no transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 -- Martin Schmitt - Schmitt Systemberatung - http://www.scsy.de DE 35415 Pohlheim, Gießener Str. 18 DE 65307 Bad Schwalbach, Am Bräunchesberg 9 Linux/UNIX - Internet - E-Mail Infrastructure - Antispam/Antivirus - "What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator." - signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
