Re: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:01:43AM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:

> I already have RBL checks any other policy in place that prevents most
> of the SPAM/Malware being accepted, but sometimes Google is more
> strict / has more advanced filtering it seems.

You may also need content-based filters, though those are not
perfect either, they should be able to cut the spam volume down
further (if you're not already doing that too).

-- 
Viktor.


RE: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Marius Gologan
RBLs will not protect you against exploited accounts sending malicious
emails from popular providers (IPs with good reputation).
In your particular case, gmail's rejection might be caused by a .zip file
containing .exe or .scr file.

Marius.

-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Wiesinger
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 1:02 AM
To: Postfix Users
Subject: Re: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

* Wietse Venema  [2014-05-08 23:36]:
> Sebastian Wiesinger:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have some users that forward their mail to GMAIL. This is 
> > implemented with virtual alias maps. So postfix forwards:
> > 
> > u...@example.com -> example.u...@gmail.com
> > 
> > The problem is when SPAM mails get through all the postfix defences 
> > and get forwarded to GMAIL. GMAIL does some body checks and rejects 
> > the mail like this:
> 
> It common for people to forward all mail including spam to Gmail, and 
> to discover that some of non-spam mail is not delivered as expected.

I already have RBL checks any other policy in place that prevents most of
the SPAM/Malware being accepted, but sometimes Google is more strict / has
more advanced filtering it seems.

> If you wait for Gmail to reject mail then it is already too late.
> 
> The solution is "do not forward SPAM". Sorry, there is no simple 
> solution.

Yeah, that was kind of expected. Thanks for the reply anyway.

Regards

Sebastian

--
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE
SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant



Re: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Wietse Venema  [2014-05-08 23:36]:
> Sebastian Wiesinger:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have some users that forward their mail to GMAIL. This is
> > implemented with virtual alias maps. So postfix forwards:
> > 
> > u...@example.com -> example.u...@gmail.com
> > 
> > The problem is when SPAM mails get through all the postfix defences
> > and get forwarded to GMAIL. GMAIL does some body checks and rejects
> > the mail like this:
> 
> It common for people to forward all mail including spam to Gmail,
> and to discover that some of non-spam mail is not delivered as
> expected.

I already have RBL checks any other policy in place that prevents most
of the SPAM/Malware being accepted, but sometimes Google is more
strict / has more advanced filtering it seems.

> If you wait for Gmail to reject mail then it is already too late.
> 
> The solution is "do not forward SPAM". Sorry, there is no simple
> solution.

Yeah, that was kind of expected. Thanks for the reply anyway.

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant


Re: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Sebastian Wiesinger:
> Hello,
> 
> I have some users that forward their mail to GMAIL. This is
> implemented with virtual alias maps. So postfix forwards:
> 
> u...@example.com -> example.u...@gmail.com
> 
> The problem is when SPAM mails get through all the postfix defences
> and get forwarded to GMAIL. GMAIL does some body checks and rejects
> the mail like this:

It common for people to forward all mail including spam to Gmail,
and to discover that some of non-spam mail is not delivered as
expected.

If you wait for Gmail to reject mail then it is already too late.

The solution is "do not forward SPAM". Sorry, there is no simple
solution.

Wietse


RE: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Marius Gologan
Filtering your inbound traffic for spam and malware will prevent these cases
(malicious messages will not be forwarded).

Marius.

-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Wiesinger
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 12:02 AM
To: Postfix Users
Subject: Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

Hello,

I have some users that forward their mail to GMAIL. This is implemented with
virtual alias maps. So postfix forwards:

u...@example.com -> example.u...@gmail.com

The problem is when SPAM mails get through all the postfix defences and get
forwarded to GMAIL. GMAIL does some body checks and rejects the mail like
this:

 relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1b]:25,
 delay=3.8, delays=2.7/0.01/0.51/0.6, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1b] said: 552-5.7.0  This
message was blocked because its content presents a potential
 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit 552-5.7.0
 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6590 to review  our 552
5.7.0 message content and attachment content guidelines.
 f45si10647314eet.279 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command))

Now postfix generates a bounce message which 99.9% of the time will not be
deliverable (because sender is faked) and just sit in the queue for five
days.

Question is, is there a way to prevent this from happening (if possible
without using sender verification)?

Something like relaying the error back to the client (delay accepting the
mail until dowstream MTA has accepted it as well) or not generating a
non-delivery notification... I can't figure out if that is possible with
postfix.


Regards

Sebastian


--
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE
SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant



Wait if downstream MTA accepts mail - reject if not

2014-05-08 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
Hello,

I have some users that forward their mail to GMAIL. This is
implemented with virtual alias maps. So postfix forwards:

u...@example.com -> example.u...@gmail.com

The problem is when SPAM mails get through all the postfix defences
and get forwarded to GMAIL. GMAIL does some body checks and rejects
the mail like this:

 relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1b]:25,
 delay=3.8, delays=2.7/0.01/0.51/0.6, dsn=5.7.0, status=bounced (host
 gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1b] said: 552-5.7.0
 This message was blocked because its content presents a potential
 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit 552-5.7.0
 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6590 to review
 our 552 5.7.0 message content and attachment content guidelines.
 f45si10647314eet.279 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command))

Now postfix generates a bounce message which 99.9% of the time will
not be deliverable (because sender is faked) and just sit in the queue
for five days.

Question is, is there a way to prevent this from happening (if
possible without using sender verification)?

Something like relaying the error back to the client (delay accepting
the mail until dowstream MTA has accepted it as well) or not
generating a non-delivery notification... I can't figure out if that
is possible with postfix.


Regards

Sebastian


-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant