Re: catch-all local mail

2010-04-01 Thread Charlie Root
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:12 PM, mouss  wrote:
> Charlie Root a écrit :
>> I've been fighting with it for a long time but still can't get the desirable:
>> - forward all local mail sent to valid unix users (+postmaster and
>> abuse redirects of course) to specific email address.
>>
>> I.e. forward all mail sent to:
>> [any-valid-unix-name-from-etc-pass...@[any-ip-address-of-the-host]
>> [valid-us...@[any-hostname-of-the-server]
>> just [valid-user] without domain part
>>
>> In other words any address which local service would accept.
>>
>> I've tried luser_relay but it local service still desperately wants to
>> deliver to local unix mailbox first.
>> I've tried "mailbox_transport = virtual" and "localredir_alias_maps =
>> static:redirect-h...@example.org" but then virtual service failed to
>> deliver to "redirect-h...@example.org" with "User unknown in virtual
>> alias table".
>>
>> Is it possible to setup catch-all for local mail without specifing
>> each valid local user and/or each valid IP/hostname of the mail
>> server?
>>
>
>
> 
> maybe try
>
> real_alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $real_alias_maps
> alias_maps = static:redirect-h...@example.org
>
> (without overriding "local" configuration).
>

It seems that local lookup for owner-$user in the alias database, and
once the alias found (and it will as we have static:) it substitute
Envelope From to owner-$user instead of just $user. And I have not
found the option to override it.

However changing static to simple regexp completely solved the issue:

main.cf:
real_alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $real_alias_maps
alias_maps = alias_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/catch-all-local.regexp

catch-all-local.regexp:
!/^owner-/ redirect-h...@example.org

Thanks a lot for insight!

Dimitri.


Re: catch-all local mail

2010-03-29 Thread mouss
Charlie Root a écrit :
> I've been fighting with it for a long time but still can't get the desirable:
> - forward all local mail sent to valid unix users (+postmaster and
> abuse redirects of course) to specific email address.
> 
> I.e. forward all mail sent to:
> [any-valid-unix-name-from-etc-pass...@[any-ip-address-of-the-host]
> [valid-us...@[any-hostname-of-the-server]
> just [valid-user] without domain part
> 
> In other words any address which local service would accept.
> 
> I've tried luser_relay but it local service still desperately wants to
> deliver to local unix mailbox first.
> I've tried "mailbox_transport = virtual" and "localredir_alias_maps =
> static:redirect-h...@example.org" but then virtual service failed to
> deliver to "redirect-h...@example.org" with "User unknown in virtual
> alias table".
> 
> Is it possible to setup catch-all for local mail without specifing
> each valid local user and/or each valid IP/hostname of the mail
> server?
> 



maybe try

real_alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $real_alias_maps
alias_maps = static:redirect-h...@example.org

(without overriding "local" configuration).


catch-all local mail

2010-03-29 Thread Charlie Root
I've been fighting with it for a long time but still can't get the desirable:
- forward all local mail sent to valid unix users (+postmaster and
abuse redirects of course) to specific email address.

I.e. forward all mail sent to:
[any-valid-unix-name-from-etc-pass...@[any-ip-address-of-the-host]
[valid-us...@[any-hostname-of-the-server]
just [valid-user] without domain part

In other words any address which local service would accept.

I've tried luser_relay but it local service still desperately wants to
deliver to local unix mailbox first.
I've tried "mailbox_transport = virtual" and "localredir_alias_maps =
static:redirect-h...@example.org" but then virtual service failed to
deliver to "redirect-h...@example.org" with "User unknown in virtual
alias table".

Is it possible to setup catch-all for local mail without specifing
each valid local user and/or each valid IP/hostname of the mail
server?

Thanks!

Dimitri.