Re: question on missing binaries after build

2015-12-19 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> 
> > However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being
> > installed:
> > 
> > posttls-finger
> > qmqp-sink
> > qmqp-source
> > smtp-sink
> > smtp-source
> > 
> > Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a
> > postfix build?
> 
> These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix
> package.  They are optional.  It is not a question of "worthy",
> rather essential, vs. not essential.

Additionally, no effort is made to maintain compatibility, unike
the rest of Postfix.

Wietse


question on missing binaries after build

2015-12-18 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount

Going to try this again, as the original message was blocked by a filter...

I noticed when building 3.0.3, there is a srcdir/bin created.

This has the following contents:

postalias  postconf  postfix   postlock  postmappostqueue 
posttls-finger  qmqp-source  smtp-sink
postcatpostdrop  postkick  postlog   postmulti  postsuper  qmqp-sink 
sendmail smtp-source



However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being 
installed:


posttls-finger
qmqp-sink
qmqp-source
smtp-sink
smtp-source

Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a 
postfix build?


Thanks,
Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.

Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration


Re: question on missing binaries after build

2015-12-18 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

> However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being
> installed:
> 
> posttls-finger
> qmqp-sink
> qmqp-source
> smtp-sink
> smtp-source
> 
> Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a
> postfix build?

These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix
package.  They are optional.  It is not a question of "worthy",
rather essential, vs. not essential.

-- 
Viktor.


Re: question on missing binaries after build

2015-12-18 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Saturday, December 19, 2015 2:40 AM + Viktor Dukhovni 
 wrote:



On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 05:58:30PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:


However, when doing "make install" a few of these do not end up being
installed:

posttls-finger
qmqp-sink
qmqp-source
smtp-sink
smtp-source

Are these utilities not considered generally worthy of inclusion in a
postfix build?


These debugging tools are not required parts of the core Postfix
package.  They are optional.  It is not a question of "worthy",
rather essential, vs. not essential.



Thanks.  We received a request to include posttls-finger, so was curious 
why it wasn't present by default.


--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.

Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration