Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Stefano Iacovella
2012/6/21 Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net:
 On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Stefano Iacovella wrote:

 Sandro, I run

  $:~/sources/geos-3.3.3$sudo make uninstall

 then

 stefano@ubuntu1204vm:~/sources/geos-3.3.3$ ll /usr/local/lib/
 ...
 drwxr-xr-x  2 root root      4096 Apr 27 16:10 geos/
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  15504429 Apr 27 16:10 libgeos-3.3.3.so*
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root    866246 Apr 27 16:10 libgeos_c.so.1.7.4*
 ...

 Should make uninstall delete the two libgeos file?

 Unless you configured the build to have a different prefix.

No I didn't
I installed 3.3.3 by

./configure
make
sudo make install
sudo ldconfig
make clean

Before dealing with 3.3.4 I tried to delete the two files and install
again 3.3.3 with

./configure
make
sudo make install
sudo ldconfig

then

ll /usr/local/lib

stefano@ubuntu1204vm:~/sources/geos-3.3.3$ ll /usr/local/lib
total 50624
drwxr-xr-x  5 root root  4096 Jun 22 08:57 ./
drwxr-xr-x 11 root root  4096 May  2 14:38 ../
drwxr-xr-x  2 root root  4096 Apr 27 16:10 geos/
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root  15504429 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos-3.3.3.so*
-rw-r--r--  1 root root  31419116 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos.a
-rw-r--r--  1 root root   1238562 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos_c.a
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root   957 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos_c.la*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos_c.so -
libgeos_c.so.1.7.4*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos_c.so.1 -
libgeos_c.so.1.7.4*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root866246 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos_c.so.1.7.4*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root   925 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos.la*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root16 Jun 22 08:57 libgeos.so - libgeos-3.3.3.so*

And running sudo make uninstall deleted all the files in
/usr/local/lib (uhm  geos related files I mean :) )

So there is no issue at all but for the sake of my understanding I
wonder if there was some link to the geos library preventing make from
uninstall them?

thank you very much for your help

Cheers

Stefano





 It is safe if I delete them and then install geos-3.3.4?

 Yes.

 --strk;
 ___
 postgis-users mailing list
 postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
 http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


---
41.95581N 12.52854E


http://www.linkedin.com/in/stefanoiacovella

http://twitter.com/#!/Iacovellas
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Stefano Iacovella
Sandro, after installing geos-3.3.4 I saw a strange, to my
understanding, libgeos_c version

lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so -
libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1 -
libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root851276 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*

while geos-3.3.3 produced libgeos_c.so.1.7.4

Is this expected?

Cheers

Stefano
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Luca Morandini

On 06/22/2012 11:16 AM, Luca Morandini wrote:


...but, still:

select postgis_full_version();
POSTGIS=2.1.0SVN r9949 GEOS=3.3.3-CAPI-1.7.4 PROJ=Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September
2009 LIBXML=2.7.6 TOPOLOGY
(1 row)


PostGIS kept on looking for libgeos-3.3.3.so under /usr/lib, hence I added a 
symbolic link there - and in /usr/local/lib, for good measure - to 3.3.4 instead.


Still no joy:

select postgis_full_version();
 POSTGIS=2.1.0SVN r9949 GEOS=3.3.3-CAPI-1.7.4 PROJ=Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September 
2009 LIBXML=2.7.6 TOPOLOGY


I did not install raster support, but this should be an issue.

Regards,

Luca Morandini
Data Architect - AURIN project
Department of Computing and Information Systems
University of Melbourne
Tel. +61 03 903 58 380
Skype: lmorandini

___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


[postgis-users] ST_Centroid error on very small polygon

2012-06-22 Thread Sandor Csaba
Hi List,

I cannot find answer to this phenomenon:

When I do this select on a very small polygon made of 3 points I get
an empty collection:

VT=# select ST_AsText(ST_Centroid(ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((56.528667
25.210167,56.529 25.2105,56.528833 25.210333,56.528667
25.210167))')));
    st_astext
--
 GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY
(1 row)

If I modify one value just a little bit (56.529=56.5291) I
get correct results:

VT=# select ST_AsText(ST_Centroid(ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((56.528667
25.210167,56.5291 25.2105,56.528833
25.210333,56.528667 25.210167))')));
    st_astext
--
 POINT(56.52887 25.21033)
(1 row)


Any of you seen such thing?

Thank you very much for your help!

Csaba


Versions:


 POSTGIS=1.5.2 GEOS=3.2.2-CAPI-1.6.2 PROJ=Rel. 4.7.1, 23
September 2009 LIBXML=2.7.6 USE_STATS


 PostgreSQL 8.4.11 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
gcc-4.4.real (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3, 64-bit

--
Sándor Csaba
szolgáltatási vezető
ViaMap Kft.
Székhely/postacím: 2176 Erdőkürt, Téglaház utca 4.

Iroda:
1076 Budapest, Garay u. 29-31. I. 1.
(EMLA Környezeti Management és Jog Egyesület)


Tel: +3630/9605853
Fax: +3617002542
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Stefano Iacovella wrote:
 Sandro, after installing geos-3.3.4 I saw a strange, to my
 understanding, libgeos_c version
 
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so -
 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1 -
 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root851276 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
 
 while geos-3.3.3 produced libgeos_c.so.1.7.4
 
 Is this expected?

Not at all ! Congratulations, you found a bug !
Ouch, it hurts pretty much. Time to push a 3.3.5 to fix this mess.

Could you please file a ticket for this ?
I'll go trough all versions in the 3.3 series to verify what happened.
If 3.3.3 installed 1.7.4 I'd expect 3.3.2 to install 1.7.3 and 3.3.4 
to install 1.7.5 ...

--strk; 

 Sent from our free software
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] ST_Centroid error on very small polygon

2012-06-22 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:39:52AM +0200, Sandor Csaba wrote:

 VT=# select ST_AsText(ST_Centroid(ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((56.528667
 25.210167,56.529 25.2105,56.528833 25.210333,56.528667
 25.210167))')));
     st_astext
 --
  GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY
 (1 row)
...
 Any of you seen such thing?

I can reproduce this. The polygon is valid.
Definitely a bug. Could you file a ticket please ?

--strk;

 Sent from our free software
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:27:48PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Stefano Iacovella wrote:
  Sandro, after installing geos-3.3.4 I saw a strange, to my
  understanding, libgeos_c version
  
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1 -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root851276 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  
  while geos-3.3.3 produced libgeos_c.so.1.7.4
  
  Is this expected?
 
 Not at all ! Congratulations, you found a bug !
 Ouch, it hurts pretty much. Time to push a 3.3.5 to fix this mess.
 
 Could you please file a ticket for this ?

I did: http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/558
Working on closing up a 3.3.5 to fix this.

--strk; 

 Sent from our free software
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Stefano Iacovella
2012/6/22 Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:27:48PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Stefano Iacovella wrote:
  Sandro, after installing geos-3.3.4 I saw a strange, to my
  understanding, libgeos_c version
 
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root        18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root        18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1 -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root    851276 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
 
  while geos-3.3.3 produced libgeos_c.so.1.7.4
 
  Is this expected?

 Not at all ! Congratulations, you found a bug !
 Ouch, it hurts pretty much. Time to push a 3.3.5 to fix this mess.

 Could you please file a ticket for this ?

 I did: http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/558
 Working on closing up a 3.3.5 to fix this.

 --strk;
Sorry Sandro, I read it only now.
Thanks for your support and my congratulations for the wonderful work
you all do on geos and PostGIS.

Cheers

Stefano
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Topology performance test

2012-06-22 Thread Sandor Csaba
Big thank to you all guys!
Csaba

On 22 June 2012 13:40, Stefano Iacovella stefano.iacove...@gmail.com wrote:
 2012/6/22 Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:27:48PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +0200, Stefano Iacovella wrote:
  Sandro, after installing geos-3.3.4 I saw a strange, to my
  understanding, libgeos_c version
 
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root        18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root        18 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1 -
  libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
  -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root    851276 Jun 22 09:38 libgeos_c.so.1.7.3*
 
  while geos-3.3.3 produced libgeos_c.so.1.7.4
 
  Is this expected?

 Not at all ! Congratulations, you found a bug !
 Ouch, it hurts pretty much. Time to push a 3.3.5 to fix this mess.

 Could you please file a ticket for this ?

 I did: http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/558
 Working on closing up a 3.3.5 to fix this.

 --strk;
 Sorry Sandro, I read it only now.
 Thanks for your support and my congratulations for the wonderful work
 you all do on geos and PostGIS.

 Cheers

 Stefano
 ___
 postgis-users mailing list
 postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
 http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users



-- 
Sándor Csaba
szolgáltatási vezető
ViaMap Kft.
Székhely/postacím: 2176 Erdőkürt, Téglaház utca 4.

Iroda:
1076 Budapest, Garay u. 29-31. I. 1.
(EMLA Környezeti Management és Jog Egyesület)


Tel: +3630/9605853
Fax: +3617002542
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] ST_Centroid error on very small polygon

2012-06-22 Thread Sandor Csaba
Sorry for mixing threads up in the conversation.

I will try to file the ticket

Csaba

On 22 June 2012 12:30, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:39:52AM +0200, Sandor Csaba wrote:

 VT=# select ST_AsText(ST_Centroid(ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((56.528667
 25.210167,56.529 25.2105,56.528833 25.210333,56.528667
 25.210167))')));
     st_astext
 --
  GEOMETRYCOLLECTION EMPTY
 (1 row)
 ...
 Any of you seen such thing?

 I can reproduce this. The polygon is valid.
 Definitely a bug. Could you file a ticket please ?

 --strk;

  Sent from our free software
  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
 ___
 postgis-users mailing list
 postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
 http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users



-- 
Sándor Csaba
szolgáltatási vezető
ViaMap Kft.
Székhely/postacím: 2176 Erdőkürt, Téglaház utca 4.

Iroda:
1076 Budapest, Garay u. 29-31. I. 1.
(EMLA Környezeti Management és Jog Egyesület)


Tel: +3630/9605853
Fax: +3617002542
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


[postgis-users] st_aspng and blob image

2012-06-22 Thread Francesco Geri
Hello everybody.
I have some problems with st_aspng and st_asraster. I would try to
generate a raster image from a vector polygon and view this with a
php script. 
Following the example in the postgis documentation:


SELECT ST_AsPNG(ST_AsRaster(ST_Buffer(ST_Point(1,5),10),150, 150, '2BUI'));
this generate a binary sequence (blob) but when I try to view it in
a web browser I obtain the follow error message

Warning: imagecreatefromstring() [function.imagecreatefromstring]: Data is not 
in a recognized format

This is my script:

header('Content-Type: image/png');
$query_finale=SELECT
ST_AsPNG(ST_AsRaster(ST_Buffer(ST_Point(1,5),10),10, 10, '2BUI'));
$finale_result_raster=pg_query($conn,$query_finale);
$final_result= pg_query($conn,$query_finale);
$img_raster=pg_fetch_array($final_result);
$immagine=$img_raster['immagine'];
imagepng($immagine);

does anyone know why it doesn't work?

Thanks!!!

Francesco
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] st_aspng and blob image

2012-06-22 Thread Bborie Park
I can't comment specifically about the imagecreatefromstring()
function but you could try the code provided at:

http://www.bostongis.com/blog/index.php?/archives/175-Minimalist-Web-based-PHP-PostGIS-2.0-Spatial-GaeometryRaster-Viewer.html

-bborie

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Francesco Geri francescog...@yahoo.it wrote:
 Hello everybody.
 I have some problems with st_aspng and st_asraster. I would try to generate
 a raster image from a vector polygon and view this with a php script.
 Following the example in the postgis documentation:

 SELECT ST_AsPNG(ST_AsRaster(ST_Buffer(ST_Point(1,5),10),150, 150, '2BUI'));


 this generate a binary sequence (blob) but when I try to view it in a web
 browser I obtain the follow error message

 Warning: imagecreatefromstring() [function.imagecreatefromstring]: Data is
 not in a recognized format

 This is my script:

 header('Content-Type: image/png');
 $query_finale=SELECT ST_AsPNG(ST_AsRaster(ST_Buffer(ST_Point(1,5),10),10,
 10, '2BUI'));
 $finale_result_raster=pg_query($conn,$query_finale);
 $final_result= pg_query($conn,$query_finale);
 $img_raster=pg_fetch_array($final_result);
 $immagine=$img_raster['immagine'];
 imagepng($immagine);

 does anyone know why it doesn't work?

 Thanks!!!

 Francesco

 ___
 postgis-users mailing list
 postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
 http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users




-- 
Bborie Park
Programmer
Center for Vectorborne Diseases
UC Davis
530-752-8380
bkp...@ucdavis.edu
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


[postgis-users] Problem compiling PostGIS2.0 with GEOS 1.3.3+

2012-06-22 Thread Jan Hartmann
Compiling PostGIS 2.0.0 will break down when the file liblwgeom.h is 
not included from the PostGIS distribution, but from the installed GEOS 
includes. This happens when the include path to the gcc compiler first 
explicitly specifies the standard include directories (/usr/include 
etc), and only afterwards the specific PostGIS include directories, like 
-I/usr/local/include -I../libwgeom. The problem is that the file 
liblwgeom.h exists both in the GEOS distribution and in the PostGIS 
source. Things are defined differently im both versions, i.e. a struct 
BOX3D with and without a srid member.


I solved the problem by changing #include liblwgeom.h into #include 
../liblwgeom.h in all C-files in the postgis subdirectory. Another way 
would be to change the compile setup in configure. Best would be, of 
course, to either synchronize both liblwgeom.h files, or rename the 
PostGIS version. The way it now is organised is asking for trouble.


Cheers,

Jan
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


[postgis-users] PostGIS 2.0.1 Released

2012-06-22 Thread Paul Ramsey
The latest PostGIS release is a bug fix release, including a large
number of minor issues reported since the release of 2.0.0.

  http://postgis.org/download/postgis-2.0.1.tar.gz

Use and enjoy!

* Bug Fixes *

  - #1264, fix st_dwithin(geog, geog, 0).
  - #1468  shp2pgsql-gui table column schema get shifted
  - #1694, fix building with clang. (vince)
  - #1708, improve restore of pre-PostGIS 2.0 backups.
  - #1714, more robust handling of high topology tolerance.
  - #1755, ST_GeographyFromText support for higher dimensions.
  - #1759, loading transformed shapefiles in raster enabled db.
  - #1761, handling of subdatasets in NetCDF, HDF4 and HDF5 in raster2pgsql.
  - #1763, topology.toTopoGeom use with custom search_path.
  - #1766, don't let ST_RemEdge* destroy peripheral TopoGeometry objects.
  - #1774, Clearer error on setting an edge geometry to an invalid one.
  - #1775, ST_ChangeEdgeGeom collision detection with 2-vertex target.
  - #1776, fix ST_SymDifference(empty, geom) to return geom.
  - #1779, install SQL comment files.
  - #1782, fix spatial reference string handling in raster.
  - #1789, fix false edge-node crossing report in ValidateTopology.
  - #1790, fix toTopoGeom handling of duplicated primitives.
  - #1791, fix ST_Azimuth with very close but distinct points.
  - #1797, fix (ValidateTopology(xxx)).* syntax calls.
  - #1805, put back the 900913 SRID entry.
  - #1813, Only show readable relations in metadata tables.
  - #1819, fix floating point issues with ST_World2RasterCoord and
   ST_Raster2WorldCoord variants.
  - #1820  compilation on 9.2beta1.
  - #1822, topology load on PostgreSQL 9.2beta1.
  - #1825, fix prepared geometry cache lookup
  - #1829, fix uninitialized read in GeoJSON parser
  - #1834, revise postgis extension to only backup
   user specified spatial_ref_sys
  - #1839, handling of subdatasets in GeoTIFF in raster2pgsql.
  - #1840, fix logic of when to compute # of tiles in raster2pgsql.
  - #1851, fix spatial_ref_system parameters for EPSG:3844
  - #1857, fix failure to detect endpoint mismatch in ST_AddEdge*Face*
  - #1865, data loss in postgis_restore.pl when data rows have leading
   dashes.
  - #1867, catch invalid topology name passed to topogeo_add*
  - #1870, align the docs and actual behavior of raster's ST_Intersects
  - #1872, fix ST_ApproxSummarystats to prevent division by zero
  - #1873, fix ptarray_locate_point to return interpolated Z/M values for
   on-the-line case
  - #1875, ST_SummaryStats returns NULL for all parameters except count
 when count is zero

* Enhancements *

  - More detailed exception message from topology editing functions.
  - #1786, improved build dependencies
  - #1806, speedup of ST_BuildArea, ST_MakeValid and ST_GetFaceGeometry.
  - #1812, Add lwgeom_normalize in LIBLWGEOM for more stable testing.
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] PostGIS 2.0.1 Released

2012-06-22 Thread Angelos Tzotsos

On 06/23/2012 12:20 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:

The latest PostGIS release is a bug fix release, including a large
number of minor issues reported since the release of 2.0.0.

   http://postgis.org/download/postgis-2.0.1.tar.gz

Use and enjoy!

* Bug Fixes *

   - #1264, fix st_dwithin(geog, geog, 0).
   - #1468  shp2pgsql-gui table column schema get shifted
   - #1694, fix building with clang. (vince)
   - #1708, improve restore of pre-PostGIS 2.0 backups.
   - #1714, more robust handling of high topology tolerance.
   - #1755, ST_GeographyFromText support for higher dimensions.
   - #1759, loading transformed shapefiles in raster enabled db.
   - #1761, handling of subdatasets in NetCDF, HDF4 and HDF5 in raster2pgsql.
   - #1763, topology.toTopoGeom use with custom search_path.
   - #1766, don't let ST_RemEdge* destroy peripheral TopoGeometry objects.
   - #1774, Clearer error on setting an edge geometry to an invalid one.
   - #1775, ST_ChangeEdgeGeom collision detection with 2-vertex target.
   - #1776, fix ST_SymDifference(empty, geom) to return geom.
   - #1779, install SQL comment files.
   - #1782, fix spatial reference string handling in raster.
   - #1789, fix false edge-node crossing report in ValidateTopology.
   - #1790, fix toTopoGeom handling of duplicated primitives.
   - #1791, fix ST_Azimuth with very close but distinct points.
   - #1797, fix (ValidateTopology(xxx)).* syntax calls.
   - #1805, put back the 900913 SRID entry.
   - #1813, Only show readable relations in metadata tables.
   - #1819, fix floating point issues with ST_World2RasterCoord and
ST_Raster2WorldCoord variants.
   - #1820  compilation on 9.2beta1.
   - #1822, topology load on PostgreSQL 9.2beta1.
   - #1825, fix prepared geometry cache lookup
   - #1829, fix uninitialized read in GeoJSON parser
   - #1834, revise postgis extension to only backup
user specified spatial_ref_sys
   - #1839, handling of subdatasets in GeoTIFF in raster2pgsql.
   - #1840, fix logic of when to compute # of tiles in raster2pgsql.
   - #1851, fix spatial_ref_system parameters for EPSG:3844
   - #1857, fix failure to detect endpoint mismatch in ST_AddEdge*Face*
   - #1865, data loss in postgis_restore.pl when data rows have leading
dashes.
   - #1867, catch invalid topology name passed to topogeo_add*
   - #1870, align the docs and actual behavior of raster's ST_Intersects
   - #1872, fix ST_ApproxSummarystats to prevent division by zero
   - #1873, fix ptarray_locate_point to return interpolated Z/M values for
on-the-line case
   - #1875, ST_SummaryStats returns NULL for all parameters except count
  when count is zero

* Enhancements *

   - More detailed exception message from topology editing functions.
   - #1786, improved build dependencies
   - #1806, speedup of ST_BuildArea, ST_MakeValid and ST_GetFaceGeometry.
   - #1812, Add lwgeom_normalize in LIBLWGEOM for more stable testing.
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Thank you Paul,

I am pushing this to openSUSE repository right now.

Best regards,
Angelos

--
Angelos Tzotsos
Remote Sensing Laboratory
National Technical University of Athens
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users


Re: [postgis-users] Problem compiling PostGIS2.0 with GEOS 1.3.3+

2012-06-22 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:27:59PM +0200, Jan Hartmann wrote:
 Compiling PostGIS 2.0.0 will break down when the file liblwgeom.h
 is not included from the PostGIS distribution, but from the
 installed GEOS includes. This happens when the include path to the
 gcc compiler first explicitly specifies the standard include
 directories (/usr/include etc), and only afterwards the specific
 PostGIS include directories, like -I/usr/local/include
 -I../libwgeom. The problem is that the file liblwgeom.h exists
 both in the GEOS distribution and in the PostGIS source. Things are
 defined differently im both versions, i.e. a struct BOX3D with and
 without a srid member.

There's no liblwgeom.h in GEOS, as far as I know.
Maybe you refer to a previous installation of PostGIS ?

--strk;

 Sent from our free software
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
___
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users