Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision
strk wrote: Perhaps we could "touch" the pgsql2shp-core.h file but that just seems messy :( Why drop the feature ? If we want a "true" repository revision we should provide that in an header file (which we'd touch) and use that when we see fit. I wouldn't drop the file-specific one though, you can always get a diff from current to the specific one w/out querying the server (right? or time to move to git :). Yeah; out of all the options I'd prefer to keep the standard svn:keywords tag and touch the file when appropriate (maybe as part of the release process?). It's not a great solution, but probably the least worse out of all the alternatives. ATB, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom http://www.siriusit.co.uk t: +44 870 608 0063 Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs ___ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:31:52PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > This appears to be a "feature" of SVN in that the revision number > embedded in the file is the last revision that altered that particular > file, and not the latest revision of the whole repository. Since we > store the revision information in a separate file (because it is re-used > in more than one place) then you don't see the "true" repository revision. > > Perhaps we could "touch" the pgsql2shp-core.h file but that just seems > messy :( Why drop the feature ? If we want a "true" repository revision we should provide that in an header file (which we'd touch) and use that when we see fit. I wouldn't drop the file-specific one though, you can always get a diff from current to the specific one w/out querying the server (right? or time to move to git :). --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html ___ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision
Denis Rykov wrote: Is the pgsl2shp show correct SVN version of revision? After updated pgsql2shp from svn and start pgsql2shp without options I get: RCSID: $Id: pgsql2shp-core.h 5870 2010-08-28 09:16:32Z mcayland $ RELEASE: 2.0 USE_GEOS=1 USE_PROJ=1 USE_STATS=1 But last SVN revision number is not 5870. This appears to be a "feature" of SVN in that the revision number embedded in the file is the last revision that altered that particular file, and not the latest revision of the whole repository. Since we store the revision information in a separate file (because it is re-used in more than one place) then you don't see the "true" repository revision. Perhaps we could "touch" the pgsql2shp-core.h file but that just seems messy :( ATB, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom http://www.siriusit.co.uk t: +44 870 608 0063 Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs ___ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
[postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision
Is the pgsl2shp show correct SVN version of revision? After updated pgsql2shp from svn and start pgsql2shp without options I get: RCSID: $Id: pgsql2shp-core.h 5870 2010-08-28 09:16:32Z mcayland $ RELEASE: > 2.0 USE_GEOS=1 USE_PROJ=1 USE_STATS=1 But last SVN revision number is not 5870. ___ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
