Re: SMTP authentication 'protocol error' against OSXS mail server
michael dunston wrote: What SSL protocols are supported by Powermail for SMTP authentication? I am trying to use use PM's smtp auth against a Mac OSXS 10.3 server (with a self-signed cert) and am unable to make it work. PowerMail currently only supports SSL on a specific port (port 465 by default for SMTP), but does not support SSL on the standard port (25 for SMTP) using the STARTTLS command. Jérôme - PowerMail Engineering - In this world, you generally get what you pay for. PowerMail is worth paying for. Download a demo. You might just like it better than your current email program. That's how I switched to this great program that really performs. PowerMail user comment on www.versiontracker.com Download a demo version from www.ctmdev.com -
Re: So how 'bout that Recent Window keystroke?
Bingo -- same app, too. Didn't even realize it was still installed on my machine. Now deleting; thanks for that! z On 7/28/2004 at 11:01 AM, PowerMail discussions wrote: In my case, it was because I had A Better Finder Rename installed, and it was eating the keystroke before PowerMail ever got a chance. Have you checked all your 3-party haxies?
Re: PowerMail support case #MYVAPY
All of a sudden PM stopped being able to make connections to the mail-servers of my different accounts. Rebuilding everything after starting PM with command-option pressed doesn't help. I have no idea what brought this on. The attached screendump shows the error message I get after waiting a long time. The screendump states: Unexpected error on pop.xs4all.nl Class='NetC', what=3, when=3, err=-355 Please help! I have to use Mail to deal with my mail now, but that doesn't help me, because I rely heavily on rules. Thanks, Mirko
Re: So how 'bout that Recent Window keystroke?
In my case, it was because I had A Better Finder Rename installed, and it was eating the keystroke before PowerMail ever got a chance. Have you checked all your 3-party haxies? A Zeph Bender at Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:09:53 -0700 said: Forgetting for a moment my ongoing issue with at least one user's inability to launch PDFs directly when received via PM; surely the techies at CTM have some idea why some of us here are unable to use the Cmd-Ctrl-R keystroke to bring up the Recent Mail window? All the other Cmd-Ctrl-x keystrokes work fine... Very annoying. z
SMTP authentication 'protocol error' against OSXS mail server
Does anyone konw what SSL protocols are supported by Powermail for SMTP authentication? I am trying to use use PM's smtp auth against a Mac OSXS 10.3 server (with a self-signed cert) and am unable to make it work. Other mail clients (Mail.app and Mailsmith) work just fine using the same settings. With powermail however, I receive an 'SSL protocol error' dialog. Thanks for any information you can offer. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- Michael Dunston -- Music and Technology -- http://www.music.vt.edu -- Virginia Tech School of the Arts
SMTP authentication 'protocol error' against OSXS mail server
What SSL protocols are supported by Powermail for SMTP authentication? I am trying to use use PM's smtp auth against a Mac OSXS 10.3 server (with a self-signed cert) and am unable to make it work. Other mail clients (Mail.app and Mailsmith) work just fine using the same settings. With powermail however, I receive an 'SSL protocol error' dialog. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- Michael Dunston -- Music and Technology -- http://www.music.vt.edu -- Virginia Tech School of the Arts
other kind of notification that sending failed
Daniel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I would like to see some other kind of notification that mail does not go out than just the yellow triangle. My proposal is a triangle symbol on the outgoing folder itself and an error log. The log could be held in the Mac OS X logs and be reached by a menu. PM 5.0.1 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
AOL Communicator
When I receive a mail from AOL Communicator user, it comes as HTML attachment, while AppleMail seems to be able to receive it as HTML message instead of attachment. When and how PM decides the message is as HTML attachment? -- - Hiro [PROTECTED] [PROTECTED] [PROTECTED]
Spin-up of HDs when switching user environment
Hi, does anyone know why switching user environments by double clicking a file of the new environment causes all attached harddisks to the machine to spin-up when they had been spundown? This is even when the environment is on the same, running disk as the old one. As it is, it takes roughly 10 to 15 seconds to switch environments because that only happens when all attached HDs are back to operation. Is there a way to avoid this? Is this an OS issue (what calls are made by PM at switching environments that might cause the OS to have to read/ write from all attached disks)? Thanks for any hints on how to avoid this. Regards, Christian.
Re: Spam not evaluated
6063 Apologies if this annoying reply reaches the list - MailSword seems to be blocking me from receiving any messages :( Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] (18/7/04 10:10 pm) said: Re: Your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - *** Attention ! *** Pour que le destinataire de votre email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) soit belle et bien avertit de celui-ci: Veuillez confirmer par retour d'email (Bouton Répondre) en indiquant sur la première ligne le code ci-dessous. Votre réponse devra être faite dans les 15 jours, sans quoi votre correspondant n'aura jamais accès à votre message. - *** Attention! *** In order to complete delivery of your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please reply on this message by typing the following passcode on the first line. Please reply within 15 days to avoid automatic deletion of your original email. Keep this text in your reply. - MailSword_Code: 6063 -- MailSword 1.61 -- MailSword_Verify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailSword_Original_Message_Id: (G?!:mZ!!L$i!RmI! MailSword_Local_Message_Id: ###A672CD55### -- Original Message Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:40:01 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Spam not evaluated -- End of Original Message Delivery of the above message is on hold pending your response. Simply by typing the correct passcode and by replying on this notification you'll complete the delivery of your original email. This step is required to avoid unwanted mass emails. This automatic response is generated by the MailSword. MailSword software provides free protection for email users worldwide. __ Protected by MailSword. Spam Ends Here FREE download at: http://www.mailsword.com
So how 'bout that Recent Window keystroke?
Forgetting for a moment my ongoing issue with at least one user's inability to launch PDFs directly when received via PM; surely the techies at CTM have some idea why some of us here are unable to use the Cmd-Ctrl-R keystroke to bring up the Recent Mail window? All the other Cmd-Ctrl-x keystrokes work fine... Very annoying. z
Re: Odd email from (possibly) PM discussions
I got the same strange email, and I haven't received any messages from powermail-discuss for the last two days. Jeremy
Re: Euro Character
4156 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:29:57 +0019 [23.10 CET] Re: Your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - *** Attention ! *** Pour que le destinataire de votre email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) soit belle et bien avertit de celui-ci: Veuillez confirmer par retour d'email (Bouton R?pondre) en indiquant sur la premi?re ligne le code ci-dessous. Votre r?ponse devra ?tre faite dans les 15 jours, sans quoi votre correspondant n'aura jamais acc?s ? votre message. - *** Attention! *** In order to complete delivery of your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please reply on this message by typing the following passcode on the first line. Please reply within 15 days to avoid automatic deletion of your original email. Keep this text in your reply. - MailSword_Code: 4156 -- MailSword 1.61 -- MailSword_Verify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailSword_Original_Message_Id: 3b:!'!J!!C_V!E$)#! MailSword_Local_Message_Id: ###A672CD2F### -- Original Message Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:21:32 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Euro Character -- End of Original Message Delivery of the above message is on hold pending your response. Simply by typing the correct passcode and by replying on this notification you'll complete the delivery of your original email. This step is required to avoid unwanted mass emails. This automatic response is generated by the MailSword. MailSword software provides free protection for email users worldwide. __ Protected by MailSword. Spam Ends Here FREE download at: http://www.mailsword.com -- Damienn ___ Death is God's way of telling you not to be such a wise guy. http://hem.bredband.net/damienn ___
Re: Resource not available exposes long-standing Powermail bug
On 17 7 2004 at 9:20 am -0400, computer artwork by subhash wrote: What is the problem with double clicks on URLs? That is standard and usual. Standard where? Off the top of my head I can't think of another app that does that (short of a web browser of course). On the other hand, cmd- click has been a convention for many years. As Mikael pointed out, virtually every text editing interface imaginable conventionally uses double-click as a word-selection mechanism. Indeed, that's why many of us find the PM URL behaviour so irritating. -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca
Re: Odd email from (possibly) PM discussions
On 18 7 2004 at 4:45 pm -0400, Rick Lecoat wrote: But this one seems to have come from CTM themselves which makes me wonder what is going on Examination of the full headers of the email do mention Perroulaz, but my knowledge of email headers is such that I don't know what to infer from this fact. Anyone have any ideas? The first (well, the last, from top-to-bottom) Received header is: Received: from unknown (HELO out.websud.ch) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@82.146.198.18) by srv2-8.ip-tech.ch with SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 19:52:18 - which I would take to be Marc Perroulaz. Looking at prior messages from CTM folk, their first hop has usually been mail.ctmdev.com, which doesn't appear in any of those headers. I would safely conclude the message came from Perroulaz's annoyingly misconfigured software. -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca
Multiple accounts
Something very strange has happened in PowerMail 5.0.1 this weekend. My .Mac account is the primary one I use, but I have 3 others (including the one provided by my ISP). Until this weekend, I would compose email in the other 3 account (although rarely the one from the ISP) and click send and off it went. Now, only the .mac mail is sent with the send. To send any other email, I need to quit PowerMail, getting the do you really want to quit you are connected message and restart; then the email was sent at first, but now, only the email from my ISP will be sent and 2 other accounts sits waiting. Several others have been using my computer the last few days and I wondered if there was some keys they hit that created some preference, although I have searched everywhere and cannot find anything. I can still send from .Mac without a problem. Midi
Re: Odd email from (possibly) PM discussions
From Rick Lecoat [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:45:26 +0100 [22.45 CET] Any comments welcome. I also received such a MailSword-generated email. Just visited www.mailsword.com to find out what this is about. Well, I'm not very impressed and that's because of two considerations: 1) Quote from the above website: Before delivering message to your mailbox MailSword system politely replies (with verification request) to an unknown sender to manually verify his intent to deliver the message to you. This approach breaks the golden rule: Never reply to spam! (Why? - Because a reply to spam is likely to generate even more spam, as you confirm the validity of your email address.) My way of handling spam is silence. No reply, no reaction. Just a quick glance at it to make sure that I don't delete the one valid message of thousands of spam, and then I let it go into the void, where the minds of spammers are. 2) Another quote from that website: MailSword software is installed on the same machine that is used as an email client (end user computer) for individual users... If the MailSword software could communicate with the mail server _before_ downloading mail to the user's hard drive, we could talk about saved bandwidth. But as the user still have to download all messages, it's not the case. True, spam won't make it all the way to the user's email client, as the MailSword software stands between the mail server and the email client, but whether it is worth $39.95 to keep track of filtered mail flagged as spam by the MailSword software or by PowerMail's filtering capabilities (with the possible added aid of SpamSieve) is everyone's decision to make. -- Damienn ___ If people think nature is their friend, then they sure don't need an enemy. - Kurt Vonnegut http://hem.bredband.net/damienn ___
Re: Resource not available exposes long-standing Powermail bug
6360 on Sun, Jul 18, 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] may have said: Re: Your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - *** Attention ! *** Pour que le destinataire de votre email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) soit belle et bien avertit de celui-ci: Veuillez confirmer par retour d'email (Bouton Répondre) en indiquant sur la première ligne le code ci-dessous. Votre réponse devra être faite dans les 15 jours, sans quoi votre correspondant n'aura jamais accès à votre message. - *** Attention! *** In order to complete delivery of your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please reply on this message by typing the following passcode on the first line. Please reply within 15 days to avoid automatic deletion of your original email. Keep this text in your reply. - MailSword_Code: 6360 -- MailSword 1.61 -- MailSword_Verify: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailSword_Original_Message_Id: ac_!31W!!b4;![kM!! MailSword_Local_Message_Id: ###A672FD9B### -- Original Message Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:52:03 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re(2): Resource not available exposes long-standing Powermail bug -- End of Original Message Delivery of the above message is on hold pending your response. Simply by typing the correct passcode and by replying on this notification you'll complete the delivery of your original email. This step is required to avoid unwanted mass emails. This automatic response is generated by the MailSword. MailSword software provides free protection for email users worldwide. __ Protected by MailSword. Spam Ends Here FREE download at: http://www.mailsword.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lane Roathe, President Ideas From the Deep mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ifd.com ___ Get a great start on your morning with Frosted Flakes in Jolt Cola!
Re: Thanks! EMA exporter
Mikael Byström sez: I don't really understand why you would like them in the EMA database (except as a backup of course), when they could all be at your fingertips any time without having to fire up FM separately. Since upgrading my system, this has been less of an issue, but at one time trying to keep massive numbers of messages within my email program slowed it down. Since I accessed the majority of mail I saved very rarely anyway, it was better to trim things down every two to three months, keeping perhaps the last 5-6 months of mail in the mail program itself. The FM Pro database I was using made a much better archiver, anyway, and, until PM recently changed it's search engine, did better searches over that large a database anyway. Plus,you write having to fire up FM separately like it takes a massive amount of time to do so. :) Click on the database, a couple dockbar bounces, and the database is ready for searches. Boom. The wait is, at most, a couple or three seconds. I fritter away more than that when I fall asleep at the keyboard each afternoon. :) -- Michael Lewis Off Balance Production [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.offbalance.com
Spam protection messages are spam!!!!!!!!
I really think the recent MailSword generated message replies, that I'm sure more subscribers to this list have received, are to be considered as spam and dealt with accordingly. This goes for all of the similar services. Obviusly the offender is the service user that forgets to exempt hie/hers mailing lists. PM 5.0.1 | OS X 10.3.4 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
