Re: GPG?
computer artwork by subhash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there already a script or a plugin to integrate gpg in powermail ? It's my interest too. me too... -- remove .listes and add a dot after fh please enlevez .listes et ajoutez un point après fh
Re: PM quits unexpected - IMAP
Rick Lecoat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thu, Nov 25, 2004 07:57 said: The mutli-paragraphed subject line of this thread was making a hideous mess of my mail browser -- I actually thought there was a bug in the app at first, but no, it was just somebody pasting half an email into their subject line for some reason. I saw the same mess. But it is still a bug in PM. PM could detect that the subject has many lines, then show only one line, or merge lines, or something. -- Erroneous google translation: To cook with the furnace approximately 15 minutes and to be useful.
Re: printing
rene, Bring away the file Setup Database from directory Power Mail Files. (Do not delet-it yet.) Restart PM. that did the trick, but then all my 'setup' stuff is gone of course. any way to re-import it? i didn't delete it because i use it now ;) ddv
Re(2): printing
Rene, Seems. that it's an error code of your printer. Brother? i use several printers, including a 'brother'. but even when that printer isn't checked because i rarely use it, powermail won't print. as a test, i deleted the printer from print center. still get the same error. Other idea: The font with which the mail should be printed is not ok. (To check this, use the same font in an other application and print-it out.) i save the message as text, open it in text edit, use same font and it prints fine. ddv
Re(2): printing
hello, when printing a text message from powermail, it shows error -9465. if you use the last beta-version (5.1b3) there is an issue with printing (it's openly announced with the beta readme) but I don't remember exactly what. Check the readme. upgraded to 5.1, but i still get error -9465 when i want to print ddv
feature request
I have my preferences set up so that the default setting for replying to a message places the quoted text at the *end* of the message. Something that would help me out enormously would be to have a key code (eg, Cmd-Ctrl-R) to reverse that default, just for that instance -- so, in my case it would put the quoted text at the *start* of the message. (For someone who normally had it at the start, it would put the quotation at the end). Currently my only option in those minority cases where I want the quoted text at the start (eg. if I'm replying to a particular passage from the original email) is to either change my preferences (and change them back again afterward -- not a neat solution) or to start cutting and pasting. How about these shortcuts: Cmd-Ctrl-R: Reply with reversed insertion point setting -- for that instance only. (If user normally has quote original text turned OFF in preferences, this shortcut turns it ON, and WITHOUT reversing the insertion point setting. ) Cmd-Shift-Ctrl-R: (bit awkward, I'll admit) Reply to all, modified as above. I'd find this incredibly useful. Rick -- G5 2GHz x2 :: 2GB RAM :: 10.3.6 :: PM 5.1 :: 3 pane mode
Re: Feature request: Reply to list command
Am 25.11.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben: But if list daddies or moms are too lazy to format the list in a proper way - why PM should do the work of them? For the benefit of PM users? I read several (good working) lists and have no need for. Ask your list administrators to do a better job! ;-)
Re: Feature request: Reply to list command
Rene Merz (25/11/04 10:18 am) said: If you install a directory, named ListName and a filter ListName who identifies all ListName-mails and brings them to that directory - your problem is solved. You just can reply to any ListName-mail and your mail goes allways to the right (list-)address. I filter list emails into separate directories. It has no effect on the reply address. But if list daddies or moms are too lazy to format the list in a proper way - why PM should do the work of them? For the benefit of PM users? Jeremy
Re: Feature request: Reply to list command
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:22:26 +, Jeremy Hughes wrote: What would be really nice IMO is a preference option so that any reply to a list message is automatically directed to the list, regardless of whether the reply-to header has been set to do this. Right. Perhaps the answer is do be able to designate which addresses are lists, and define a list-reply behavior that suits. -- Shane Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG?
[Matthias Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 25.11.2004 um 10:56 Uhr:] is there already a script or a plugin to integrate gpg in powermail ? It's my interest too. -- http://www.subhash.at
GPG?
Hello, is there already a script or a plugin to integrate gpg in powermail ? thanks and all the best Matthias --- schmidt-systemdevelopment http://www.schmidt-system.com iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan Tel. +81-736-56-3905 ---
Re: make scripts invisible in the scriptmenu
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Mikael, I don't know how to do this but I do put scripts that are only called by other scripts into a Subroutines folder and the AS menu will show the name of this menu. You may try putting the folder very deep, say nesting 5 or 6 layers deep. It's possible the code making the menu won't go that deep. It didn't used to go more than 5 layers, but I imagine Apple fixed that. ;-) -- Andy Fragen On Tue, Nov 23, 2004, Mikael Byström said: Please, remind me on how I can make scripts, which are only called from other scripts, to not be visible in the Scriptmenu? They need to be reachable in that directory, so possibly I can rename them with a . prefix, but is there also another way? I'd really prefer if they were visible in the Finder, but not in the Scriptmenu of PM. PM 5.1 | OS X 10.3.6 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768 MB RAM | 30 GB HD
Re: make scripts invisible in the scriptmenu
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:03:58 +0100, Mikael Byström wrote: It's seems pretty stupid that all scripts should be picked up You're joking, right? The developer gives you a folder and says the role of this folder is to give you a place to put scripts you want to be called from the interface. Now it may be *inconvenient* for something you want to do, which is to use a folder designed to display scripts but have it instead display some but not others, but to call it pretty stupid is, well, pretty stupid. Apply your argument to the font folders, or the scripting additions folders, or plug-in folders -- Shane Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
