Re(4): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread CTM info
Peter,

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell  wrote:

>I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?
>
>Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
against inadvertant destruction of attachments.

And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
orphaned.

What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
"Find duplicates" feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
the file referenced by a message as its attachment.

Regards,

jean michel




Re: Re(4): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread Mirko Kranenburg
What about exporting as PowerMail Exchange including attachments, the deleting 
the whole lot and importing again?
It is a bit a roundabout way, and it will take a lot of time for a large 
archive, but it should work, or am I wrong?

Mirko

On 22 nov 2010, at 23:24, CTM info wrote:

> Peter,
> 
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell  wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?
>> 
>> Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?
> 
> The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
> their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
> trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
> against inadvertant destruction of attachments.
> 
> And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
> orphaned.
> 
> What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
> "Find duplicates" feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
> of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
> newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
> duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
> the file referenced by a message as its attachment.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> jean michel
> 
>