Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Jan M.J. Storms
Hans Glomme scripsit dd. Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:04:16 +0100 (internet: @044)

Hello,

I'm new with powermail and now I'm looking for the features. Because I'm
described to many mailing lists, I was looking for a feature that shows
me the threads for example sorted by message ID or subject. That makes
it more easy for me to read the threads.

Can anyone tell me how to do it?

Sorry for my maybe badly english. Hope someone can help me with that.

-- 
Greetings out of Munich
Hans




Hi Hans,

Sort your messages by Date Sent by clicking on that column in the
message browser. Then enter (part of) the subject of the thread in the
filter in the upper right corner of the browser.

It is not entirely the feature you are looking for, but nonetheless a
good part of it.


Kind regards,

Jan Storms




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Michael J . Hußmann
Hans Glomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 - reciept- and reading confirmation

There is no way to be sure someone has really read your mail unless
they've said so, and anyway, a request for automatic confirmation can be
construed as an intrusion on privacy. If PowerMail should support this
feature in a future version, I would instantly turn it off. This kind of
information is nobody's business unless I decide it is.

 - Threading

I've never used a mail client that supported threading, so I don't know
_what_ I miss -- but I cannot say that I miss it. All I hear is people
complaining about threading not working reliably. For example, I have
subscribed to several mailing lists in digest mode. When I am replying
to a message within a digest, I am necessarily breaking the thread;
there's nothing I can do about it.

 - In some clients also the possibility to filter for mailing lists

Maybe I don't understand what you are missing, but I have filters set up
for all the mailing lists I have subscribed to. What is it that filters
should do that they don't do already?

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Gomme
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:49:35 +0100, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hans Glomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 - reciept- and reading confirmation
 
 There is no way to be sure someone has really read your mail unless
 they've said so, and anyway, a request for automatic confirmation can be
 construed as an intrusion on privacy. If PowerMail should support this
 feature in a future version, I would instantly turn it off. This kind of
 information is nobody's business unless I decide it is.

You are right ;) But my business partner normally confirm 
it that they read. 
But what you can do and what the most server understood is, 
that you can ask the server for a delivery confirmation.
Of course you never can be sure that the recipient has read 
your mail, understood it or put it unread in the trash.


 
 - Threading
 
 I've never used a mail client that supported threading, so I don't know
 _what_ I miss -- but I cannot say that I miss it. All I hear is people
 complaining about threading not working reliably. For example, I have
 subscribed to several mailing lists in digest mode. When I am replying
 to a message within a digest, I am necessarily breaking the thread;
 there's nothing I can do about it. 

Well if you got 500 Mails each day from different lists and 
searching for a special theme or want follow a longer 
thread you will know what I mean ;)
Think it's very exhausting if you don't have such a feature.

 
 - In some clients also the possibility to filter for mailing lists
 
 Maybe I don't understand what you are missing, but I have filters set up
 for all the mailing lists I have subscribed to. What is it that filters
 should do that they don't do already?

Ok show me the filter for list-id ;) Because the list-id 
is allways the same address. In some lists you have the 
list mail into cc in other ones from an also in reply to.
-- 
Greetings
Hans



Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Tim Hodgson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 2:05 pm +0100, Hans Gomme wrote:

 - In some clients also the possibility to filter for mailing lists
 
 Maybe I don't understand what you are missing, but I have filters set up
 for all the mailing lists I have subscribed to. What is it that filters
 should do that they don't do already?

Ok show me the filter for list-id ;) Because the list-id 
is allways the same address. In some lists you have the 
list mail into cc in other ones from an also in reply to.

There isn't a ready-made filter, but in the 'Filters' pane you can
select 'Other field...', and type 'List-Id' into the box.

-- 
TimH

PowerMail 5.5.2 (build 4475) | OS X 10.4.9 | PowerBook FW/500 | 1GB RAM




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Michael J . Hußmann
Hans Gomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Ok show me the filter for list-id ;) Because the list-id
is allways the same address. In some lists you have the
list mail into cc in other ones from an also in reply to.

Well, if there is a list-id (whatever that is) in the header, then you
can filter for it (select Anderes Feld ... if it's not in the standard
list of header fields).

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Glomme
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:31:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hans Gomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Ok show me the filter for list-id ;) Because the list-id 
is allways the same address. In some lists you have the 
list mail into cc in other ones from an also in reply to.

Well, if there is a list-id (whatever that is) in the header, then you
can filter for it (select Anderes Feld ... if it's not in the standard
list of header fields). 


Sorry to say it ;) You are wrong here an example header from a mailman
list and that's a header what is strict RFC:

List-Id: Mailman mailing list management users mailman-users.python.org
List-Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-
users, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Archive: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users
List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

if you look for example in entourage you also will find there a
possibility to filter for that x-header.

And all Mailing lists use it doesn't matter if Wikipedia, Yahoo, mailman etc.
Also the Postfix developer Mailing list use this and I can't think that
special this guys don't use non RFC headers :)

-- 
Greetings
Hans





Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Glomme
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:28:49 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

There isn't a ready-made filter, but in the 'Filters' pane you can
select 'Other field...', and type 'List-Id' into the box.

Thank you I will try this :) Will be very helpful for me if it works.

-- 
Greetings
Hans




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Glomme
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:33:38 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

You would use the Other Field... option to define your filter criterion.

Hi Jan, 

I try but not so the hit :( Because I see I allways must copy it and
paste it into the filter.

I also looked into entourage (example) and see that they have a special
ruleset for Mailing list called Malinglist rules.

Into Gyazmail the field in the rule manager exist. Also for thunderbird
you can get a mailing list plugin to make rules using the list-id.

But think also must work without that field for now till the developer
have change it.

How normally they will be informed about missing things? Means how can a
user make a suggestion?

Thnx for your answer.

-- 
Greetings
Hans




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Michael J . Hußmann
Hans Glomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 Sorry to say it ;) You are wrong here an example header from a mailman
 list and that's a header what is strict RFC:

Well, it is as I (and others) have said: If there is a list-id field
in the header (not for this list, as far as I can tell), then you can
filter for it using Other field ... (I had mentioned the German
localization Anderes Feld..., assuming you were German).

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Gomme
Hi Barbara 
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:40:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 We have discussed threading before and it seems that threading is
 difficult to implement in a mail application. At that time it was
 something that was NOT going to be included in Power Mail. I missed
 threading when I first came to Power Mail but now with the other
 advantages I keep Power Mail anyway.

Well think nothing seems easy if you try it :) Some things 
are difficult other ones not so :)
Well the point is not that is will be really difficult to 
sor a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

But think at that situation. You have a mailing list with 
100 e-mails and more each day.

Now at first you have a thread let's say A. Then you become 
answers on that. You will be very interested into that 
Thread. Then someone say Hey I must look first something 
before I answer, during the time he think about comes 
another 500 Mails with other threads. Then you have the 
thread you ar interested at the bottom some answers maybe 
in the middle and other ones at the top. Think that's not 
really a good working. Or you see it not like me?
Ok now you can go and say for each thread I'm interested I 
make a subfolder and filter by topic but think that can't 
be really a solution?!  

I'm not sure but I think normal the MUA's I know do the 
threading by using the message ID. Normal every thread have 
a starting message id and if you look for example the 
message ID here (Message-Id: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) will be during 
the thread allways the same (local part) only if a reply of 
a reply follows the host part change. 

But I'm not the real expert in this thing I only think to 
remember to read something bout the threading and how it 
normal works in MUA's.

 As for as sorting into folders by mailing list, that is easy to set up.
 Usually I use the Reply-To address when setting up the filter. Now, if
 you mean some sort WITHIN a mailing list folder, I don't do that. But I
 have a whole section of mailing lists divided by their names.
 I make a top folder that says Mailing Lists. Nothing actually goes in
 to that folder. Then under that there are sub-folders with the name of
 each list I am on.

The List-id field was only a smal problem for me. And for 
me it's not so necessary like the possibility to sort by 
thread.



Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Michael J . Hußmann
Hans Gomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 I'm not sure but I think normal the MUA's I know do the
 threading by using the message ID. Normal every thread have
 a starting message id and if you look for example the
 message ID here (Message-Id:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) will be during
 the thread allways the same (local part) only if a reply of
 a reply follows the host part change.

 But I'm not the real expert in this thing I only think to
 remember to read something bout the threading and how it
 normal works in MUA's.

The message ID will be different for each mail within a thread, but
there is an In-Reply-To field that contains the message ID of the
message replied to; this is used for threading. For example, copying
from the header of your message:

Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the ID of Barbara's message
that you replied to.

However, sometimes threading doesn't work, either because someone
participating in an exchange doesn't use reply or because the reply is
to a message within a digest (which has its own message ID that is not
connected to any thread). Or someone hits Reply, but edits the subject
as he really wants to start a new thread. In the first case, the thread
breaks up into two subthreads, and in the second case, mail clients
supporting threading will display the message within a thread it doesn't
belong to.

 The List-id field was only a smal problem for me. And for
 me it's not so necessary like the possibility to sort by
 thread.

But thankfully, filtering for List-id isn't a problem at all; you can do
it if you want. If the mail headers do contain a List-id field, that is:
of the 16 mailing lists I've subscribed to, only 6 use list-id.

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de




Re: Threading

2007-11-26 Thread Hans Gomme
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:27:51 +0100, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The message ID will be different for each mail within a thread, but
 there is an In-Reply-To field that contains the message ID of the
 message replied to; this is used for threading. For example, copying
 from the header of your message:
 
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the ID of Barbara's message
 that you replied to.

I see.

 However, sometimes threading doesn't work, either because someone
 participating in an exchange doesn't use reply or because the reply is
 to a message within a digest (which has its own message ID that is not
 connected to any thread). Or someone hits Reply, but edits the subject
 as he really wants to start a new thread. In the first case, the thread
 breaks up into two subthreads, and in the second case, mail clients
 supporting threading will display the message within a thread it doesn't
 belong to. 

Well that can happend allways that someone destroy the 
thread.

 The List-id field was only a smal problem for me. And for 
 me it's not so necessary like the possibility to sort by 
 thread.
 
 But thankfully, filtering for List-id isn't a problem at all; you can do
 it if you want. If the mail headers do contain a List-id field, that is:
 of the 16 mailing lists I've subscribed to, only 6 use list-id. 

Well at me (ok only subscribed to yahoo and mailman lists 
(think yahoo also use mailman) there is a list-id.
I looked into Gyazmail (because was interested) and also 
here the thread was displayed good. (without list-id).
So I asked myself how other MUA's will do it? They also 
like I would say cook only with water.

But thank you for explaining it to me. Like always to learn 
new things.



Re: Threading

2007-11-25 Thread Marlyse Comte
Hallo Hans,

You can NOT sort by threading, only by subject.

To sort by subject click on the top of the list view onto SUBJECT - if
you want to change ascending to descending, clicl onto the little
triangle at the top right of the window.

Let us know if that worked out for you.

If you have troubles understanding my English, let me know and I will re-
send this email in German.

---marlyse


 former message(s) quotes: -


Hello,

I'm new with powermail and now I'm looking for the features. Because I'm
described to many mailing lists, I was looking for a feature that shows
me the threads for example sorted by message ID or subject. That makes
it more easy for me to read the threads.

Can anyone tell me how to do it?

Sorry for my maybe badly english. Hope someone can help me with that.

-- 
Greetings out of Munich
Hans







Re: Threading

2007-11-25 Thread Hans Glomme
Hallo Hans,

You can NOT sort by threading, only by subject.

To sort by subject click on the top of the list view onto SUBJECT - if
you want to change ascending to descending, clicl onto the little
triangle at the top right of the window.

Let us know if that worked out for you.

If you have troubles understanding my English, let me know and I will re-
send this email in German.

---marlyse


 former message(s) quotes: -


Hello,

I'm new with powermail and now I'm looking for the features. Because I'm
described to many mailing lists, I was looking for a feature that shows
me the threads for example sorted by message ID or subject. That makes
it more easy for me to read the threads.

Can anyone tell me how to do it?

Sorry for my maybe badly english. Hope someone can help me with that.

-- 
Greetings out of Munich
Hans




Hi Marlyse,

well think maybe wrote it here. Maybe to show it what I mean here an example:

Start Thread (1)
answer (1)
answer on the answer (1)
Next Thread (2)
answer (2)
answer on the answer (2)

Thats what I mean and also miss in PM. 

Don't know if it will be possible and also don't know how to say it in
English exactly.

I don't want only sort by date or subject, what I mean is that I whant
have a discussion on a mailing list together so that each discussion is
together and not that you found the starting thread at the end and a
answer onto the thread 50 mails later.

Thnx for your answer.

-- 
Greetings out of Munich
Hans




Re: Threading

2007-11-25 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hello,

Am/On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:27:45 +0100 schrieb/wrote Hans Glomme:

well think maybe wrote it here. Maybe to show it what I mean here an example:

Start Thread (1)
answer (1)
answer on the answer (1)
Next Thread (2)
answer (2)
answer on the answer (2)

Thats what I mean and also miss in PM. 

Don't know if it will be possible and also don't know how to say it in
English exactly.

I don't want only sort by date or subject, what I mean is that I whant
have a discussion on a mailing list together so that each discussion is
together and not that you found the starting thread at the end and a
answer onto the thread 50 mails later.

your question was understood.
Sorting by Thread is still a missing feature in PM.
We hope, that CTM will implement that in one of the next versions.
I'm also waiting to see that, meanwhile I use filters and folders for
sorting the mails of different lists.
Although other mailclients do have that feature, I still use PM, because
it's the most stable client on the Mac, especially, when you get a lot
of mails per day.

Thanks and all the best

Matthias




Re: Threading

2005-09-16 Thread Wayne Brissette

John Hay on 9/16/05 said

Apple's mail.app has a feature whereby when you select a message all the
other related threads get highlighted automatically, thus showing the
user some history. Does PowerMail do this and I'm just missing it?

No, it doesn't. There have been discussions about this before and I
believe that the result is that it isn't going to; the search function
makes it not quite so necessary although I admit sometimes I would like
it. But then I go try thunderbird which does have threading and keep
coming back to PM... 

I use mail at work because we're on a MS server and the IMAP features of
Mail seem to behave better in it. Anyhow, when I worked at Apple Cricket,
one of the programmers for Mail, told me how they really have to guess on
the threading since there isn't any internet standard to do it. They have
worked out some pretty good algorithms, but I still get quite a few
messages that get threaded that have nothing to do with each other. I
would always vote for either NO on putting it in PowerMail, or at least
make it an option. 

Wayne

-- 
All human rules are more or less idiotic.
- Mark Twain