Re: [NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting
I'm pretty sure you can do all of that. There is polling software available on the internet that you can cut and paste the code right into the blog. --- On Sun, 1/18/09, Pete Theisen wrote: > From: Pete Theisen > Subject: Re: [NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting > To: "ProFox Email List" > Date: Sunday, January 18, 2009, 1:00 AM > Michael Madigan wrote: > > You don't necessarily have to set up a website you > can set up a blog. > > I think it will be much easier to set up and > you'll be on a major > > provider. > > > > Look into blogger.com > > Hi Michael! > > Running as a social conservative but fiscal moderate, I > want to post a > survey on it to determine voter's opinions. Can I do > that on blogger? > > I will also want to post pictures, video and maybe even an > occasional > Snoop Dogg quote. Is that within their range? > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4972c583.5080...@verizon.net > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/759765.86073...@web31404.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting
Michael Madigan wrote: > You don't necessarily have to set up a website you can set up a blog. > I think it will be much easier to set up and you'll be on a major > provider. > > Look into blogger.com Hi Michael! Running as a social conservative but fiscal moderate, I want to post a survey on it to determine voter's opinions. Can I do that on blogger? I will also want to post pictures, video and maybe even an occasional Snoop Dogg quote. Is that within their range? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4972c583.5080...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting
You don't necessarily have to set up a website you can set up a blog. I think it will be much easier to set up and you'll be on a major provider. Look into blogger.com * --- On Sun, 1/18/09, Pete Theisen wrote: > From: Pete Theisen > Subject: [NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting > To: "ProFox Email List" > Date: Sunday, January 18, 2009, 12:39 AM > Hi Everyone! > > I am running for the Sarasota City Commission, a minor > elected office. > Where should I host to get good local performance? My > campaign is low > buck so I need the host that will give me bang for the low > buck. > > I have been using A Small Orange for my practice site and > for the > foundation but they are slow. I want something that will be > fast for > Sarasota users, can be slow everywhere else. > > http://www.asmallorange.com/ > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4972c09e.1040...@verizon.net > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/824655.87048...@web31405.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Pete Theisen Election site hosting
Hi Everyone! I am running for the Sarasota City Commission, a minor elected office. Where should I host to get good local performance? My campaign is low buck so I need the host that will give me bang for the low buck. I have been using A Small Orange for my practice site and for the foundation but they are slow. I want something that will be fast for Sarasota users, can be slow everywhere else. http://www.asmallorange.com/ -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4972c09e.1040...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: edit fxlistener class
Thankz Rick. Ajoy Khaund Neamati Road Near Bhogdoi Bridge Jorhat 785001-21 Assam, India Tel: 91-376-2351288 Cell: 91-94350-92287 Mail: akha...@hotmail.com Mail: akha...@gmail.com "Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if both are frozen." - Edward V. Berard, "Life-Cycle Approaches" -- From: "Rick Schummer" Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:24 AM To: Subject: RE: edit fxlistener class >>> When would one go for the source code version and how would it help in >>> any extra way.<< > > Source code version is for those who have customers who have requirements > for source code, and > interested developers. I don't really need it and consider the XFRX > development team an extension of > my own, just like I consider the framework developers part of my team. The > updates are so frequent > (once a quarter on average) I probably would not have time to keep up. > > I am not aware of a personal use license, but I know it is royalty-free > distribution. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > > www.whitelightcomputing.com > www.swfox.net > www.rickschummer.com > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/fa8d576caadf4d70a7044013fb3ec...@compaq ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Vfp9 Try command
Hi All, I am downloading data from a logger through a serial port device. The data string from the serial port has junk for the date field as a result of which an error is coming. How can I put it in a Try block. The over all code is like: Scan Try ldate = something ldate = something date time error over here catch Messagebox() LOOP endtry Endscan Is this how it is done. I am getting my msgbox but I still get a vfp error message. How to avaoid that. TIA Ajoy Khaund Neamati Road Near Bhogdoi Bridge Jorhat 785001-21 Assam, India Tel: 91-376-2351288 Cell: 91-94350-92287 Mail: akha...@hotmail.com Mail: akha...@gmail.com "Walking on water and developing software from a specification are easy if both are frozen." - Edward V. Berard, "Life-Cycle Approaches" --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f5d903c3e2b04e1ebb1ab68e96b9c...@compaq ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: using FLUSH in your apps -- any negative consequence?
No, flushing to disk, while relatively time consuming is a way to reduce corruption. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:59 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: using FLUSH in your apps -- any negative consequence? Rick Schummer wrote: >>> Some folks say that FLUSH definitely helps, but is there any reason where FLUSH would HURT or > CAUSE ISSUES?<< > > FLUSH does have a performance hit on a network and does not guarantee the writing of data if there > buffering on the drive by the OS. You would need the FLUSH FORCE to tell Windows to get it to disk. I'm just wondering if I should remove the FLUSH, so it would only do a TABLEUPDATE. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04c101c9790f$a2448680$e6cd93...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: edit fxlistener class
>> When would one go for the source code version and how would it help in any >> extra way.<< Source code version is for those who have customers who have requirements for source code, and interested developers. I don't really need it and consider the XFRX development team an extension of my own, just like I consider the framework developers part of my team. The updates are so frequent (once a quarter on average) I probably would not have time to keep up. I am not aware of a personal use license, but I know it is royalty-free distribution. Rick White Light Computing, Inc. www.whitelightcomputing.com www.swfox.net www.rickschummer.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04c001c9790f$a214c3f0$e63e4b...@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
Ken, I have the MX record on my domain sending all my domain Email to the Gmail system. My system downloads the mail from their server so I have it locally or I can access it via browser. There is no charge for this service. It's been some time since I set it up so I can't easily tell you how I did it but if you are interested - it is pretty straightforward to do. HTH - Joe Yoder On Saturday, January 17, 2009 5:02 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: >> > Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to strip "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" >> > out of the subject line. >> >>Let me respectfully suggest that what you need is a new mail provider, >>and/or ISP. > >Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:02:20 -0500 >From: Ken Dibble >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >cc: >Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages > >Oh yeah, I do, but my options are limited. I live in the boonies. Frontier >is the only option for decent DSL service. I had satellite for a while and >that sucked. Cable is not available. And although I could purchase a >different mail service, I hate the idea. Part of what I'm paying Frontier >for is email; I expect to get what I pay for, without having to pay >somebody else to provide a service I'm already getting. > >And the last message I got--one from Alan about FLUSH--arrived without >the [SUSPECTED SPAM] tag! So maybe the brain-dead filter is finally learning. > >Ken >www.stic-cil.org > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/81.50.00483.e6a72...@cm-2.zoominternet.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
Ken Dibble wrote: > Ken > www.stic-cil.org Hi Ken! Interesting large building. Don't seem to have any senior programs? I know, there aren't any left in Binghamton. :-) -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/497270ba.7030...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
If they really suck I would go with another mail service outside of frontiernet like Yahoo business mail. --- On Sat, 1/17/09, Ken Dibble wrote: > From: Ken Dibble > Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages > To: profox@leafe.com > Date: Saturday, January 17, 2009, 5:02 PM > > > Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to > strip "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" > > > out of the subject line. > > > >Let me respectfully suggest that what you need is a new > mail provider, > >and/or ISP. > > Oh yeah, I do, but my options are limited. I live in the > boonies. Frontier > is the only option for decent DSL service. I had satellite > for a while and > that sucked. Cable is not available. And although I could > purchase a > different mail service, I hate the idea. Part of what > I'm paying Frontier > for is email; I expect to get what I pay for, without > having to pay > somebody else to provide a service I'm already getting. > > And the last message I got--one from Alan about > FLUSH--arrived without > the [SUSPECTED SPAM] tag! So maybe the brain-dead filter is > finally learning. > > Ken > www.stic-cil.org > > > > ___ > Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20090117165908.01af2...@pop3.frontiernet.net > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/668588.49907...@web31401.mail.mud.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
> > Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to strip "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" > > out of the subject line. > >Let me respectfully suggest that what you need is a new mail provider, >and/or ISP. Oh yeah, I do, but my options are limited. I live in the boonies. Frontier is the only option for decent DSL service. I had satellite for a while and that sucked. Cable is not available. And although I could purchase a different mail service, I hate the idea. Part of what I'm paying Frontier for is email; I expect to get what I pay for, without having to pay somebody else to provide a service I'm already getting. And the last message I got--one from Alan about FLUSH--arrived without the [SUSPECTED SPAM] tag! So maybe the brain-dead filter is finally learning. Ken www.stic-cil.org ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20090117165908.01af2...@pop3.frontiernet.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: using FLUSH in your apps -- any negative consequence?
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:53:58 -0500, "Rick Schummer" > FLUSH FORCE That sounds like some badly animated team of superheroes dreamed up for TV ads about toilet cleaner. -- Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1232223915.8327.1295327...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
On Jan 17, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > Ken Dibble wrote: >>> I set up one to use "profox@leafe.com in my >>> contacts" (whitelisting) >> >> Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to strip >> "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" >> out of the subject line. > > Let me respectfully suggest that what you need is a new mail > provider, and/or ISP. You took the works right out of my fingers Ken (the original one) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3aadddee-7216-42b6-b92e-c83b377fd...@information-architecture.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
Ken Dibble wrote: >> I set up one to use "profox@leafe.com in my contacts" (whitelisting) > > Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to strip "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" > out of the subject line. Let me respectfully suggest that what you need is a new mail provider, and/or ISP. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/49721d64.6070...@ulmcnett.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
> I set up one to use "profox@leafe.com in my contacts" (whitelisting) Okay, that works. But now I need to find a way to strip "[SUSPECTED SPAM]" out of the subject line. Ken www.stic-cil.org ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20090117121616.01b66...@pop3.frontiernet.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [ADMIN] Not Getting Messages
> So far today, "training" the spam filter to not > consider them as "junk" doesn't seem to be > working, but at least I'm getting them. >Add profox@leafe.com to your web mail address book. The webmail filter system is limited and what's there may not even work. The filter gives me an option to "keep in inbox" based on various criteria. I have tried using "leafe.com" in the From field; it doesn't work because the From field contains the address of the original sender. There is no option to filter on Reply-to. Profox doesn't have anything distinctive in the Subject line like the other groups do, so I can't use that. I set up one to use "profox@leafe.com in my contacts" (whitelisting), but haven't received any messages since then. I suspect it won't work either, because the messages don't come into the inbox, they go straight to the spam folder, so they can't be "kept" there. But now I'm sending this, so I can find out what happens to it. I'll watch this over the long weekend and call them back on Tuesday if there's no improvement. Ken www.stic-cil.org ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20090117113131.01b5b...@pop3.frontiernet.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
