Re: Touch Screen Keyboard
Richard: Using the touch screen you can minimize it and then click on the icon on the status bar to restore it. Works perfect and looks nice. Thanks for the introductions. On 5/17/2014 8:35 PM, Richard Quilhot wrote: I have not explored this, but it does have the normal windows top right close "X" I would think some of the windows api programming controls might help. Rick Q quilh...@gmail.com On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: How would you close it when the form closes? On 5/17/2014 5:09 PM, Richard Quilhot wrote: The one I'm using is: "%windir%\system32\osk.exe", you should be able to call it from within VFP Rick Q quilh...@gmail.com On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: On 5/17/2014 7:54 AM, Richard Quilhot wrote: I'm using the MS On Screen Keyboard with a tablet, but it's already active when VFP starts. Rick Q quilh...@gmail.com On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: Anybody ever added a touch screen keyboard to a form? Or know of one? I have a grid and want to have a form pop up to enter data into the grid using a touch screen - no keyboard. -- Jeff Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com SanDC, Inc. 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 http://www.san-dc.com Rick: This is a touch screen that is used to log patients in and out on the screen on a network. The name, etc. currently is entered on a keyboard and the staff can enter *VERY* basic information in an Excel spreadsheet. (read "very basic" as almost nothing) I would like to have them punch a button and have a form show that has the textboxes and a keyboard on the form - using VFP of course. -- Jeff Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com SanDC, Inc. 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 http://www.san-dc.com [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5378bae8.5080...@san-dc.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: "File is not open"
I haven't had the problems you mention with the debugger (that I realize anyway), although there are times when I go to compile and it just hangs. Task Manager has it using 25% CPU but it just sits there in a "wait...I'm working" icon state. Have to End-Task when that happens. On 2014-05-18 02:39, Allen wrote: VFP does hold compiled prg files open. Which is why you can get problems in debug, which should be renamed buggy as it causes more fall over's than anything, being able to display the code. But clear all does not deal with them. I must admit I have never had a problem like yours, but then I issue a clear all in the programs anyway. Maybe the library is already open and cannot open again? Though I don't think so. Try "Set library to" next time, instead of clear all, to see if that clears your problem. I learnt something today, I didn't know about clear error. Al -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: 18 May 2014 03:09 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: "File is not open" VFP9SP2 Why is it when you go to rebuild your EXE, you get an error saying "File is not open" ?? Doing a CLEAR ALL takes care of the issue, but I'm curious to the reason why. I'm guessing it's one of the SET LIBRARY TOs ??? tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7b68db9287db39ab20c3bd0292d60...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP support
On 2014-05-18 02:25, Allen wrote: I think the downloads of runtimes have them in. But it seemed like M$ have decided VFP is not good for SQL server business and they will stop it at all costs. I do have them if anyone want them. Al Hi Al, Please send them to me. It appears this machine isn't fully patched. My VERSION(1) returns Visual FoxPro 09.00..5815 for Windows [Oct 15 2007 09:11:06] Product ID 76683-120-0083971-18373. Thanks, --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bdadc3e003ed0cfdc05117bcb698e...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Fox.wikis.com down
Somebody needs to get word to Steve Black that the Fox wikis is down: Processing Error - wiki~VisualFoxProWiki Error: 1190 Message: File c:\wiki\wwsession.fpt is too large. Code: GATHER NAME THIS.oData MEMO Program: save Line No: 128 Handled by: Wikimasterserver.OnError() ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/179d6b23d95778066283bec017f20...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP support
I will send them to your email Al -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: 18 May 2014 16:53 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP support On 2014-05-18 02:25, Allen wrote: > I think the downloads of runtimes have them in. But it seemed like M$ > have decided VFP is not good for SQL server business and they will > stop it at all costs. > I do have them if anyone want them. > Al Hi Al, Please send them to me. It appears this machine isn't fully patched. My VERSION(1) returns Visual FoxPro 09.00..5815 for Windows [Oct 15 2007 09:11:06] Product ID 76683-120-0083971-18373. Thanks, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002d01cf72a9$973bc570$c5b35050$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The "New Microsoft" is embracing open source
El 16/05/14 14:24, Gene Wirchenko escribió: At 16:52 2014-05-13, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: BTW, have you noticed the ONLY reason offered in this post to go back to MS is that now "they're listening"? So we should change once again JUST because MS is listening? Why? What are they offering besides a "listening" that they can end any time they want to? What are they offering, that we don't already have, that might justify the expense of moving back and the risk that they once again stop listening some time in the future? I have noticed businesses listening in the past. Too many times, that is all they do. You are given an opportunity to state your grievance, and then they have other customers to help. Listening without action is a waste of time. So what? Isn't bankruptcy a waste of time? Let's us ask Enron. Medium or small companies operated by their owners may think this way. It is the old way, owners being proud of their company and trying to make it better. But corporate companies? It's just a bunch of directives concerned only with their own interests, not the company's. And they do right, because the company will fire them at a moment's notice, as soon as it is convenient. So why wouldn't they also look to their own interests? I think the whole corporate system is rotten. It cannot and will not function properly, it is just a way for slippery smart people to make some fast money. Companies should be directed by their owners, by people who will be hurt if the company goes down, only then will the system work. Until that time, all your notions of companies doing the convenient or proper thing are a waste of time. Because the people running the company are not the company and don't care about wasting the company's time, just about their own interests. So once again. Why would we expect MS to keep on listening long enough to make it worth our while to migrate back? And what would be the added benefits to this migration? After all, the people we've migrated to are also listening so you'll have to do much better than that. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5378cf2a.4080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP support
LOL But hey! Remember MS is "listening". hahaha El 17/05/14 18:15, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com escribió: Bloody f*ckers! I think wOOdy's got them on his site. Best to grab them when you can I guess. Someone should post them on the ProFox downloads page. On 2014-05-17 16:00, Allen wrote: I do have them, but I had to search my backup drive. It was more a comment on M$ than anything. Al -Original Message- Yes the links to them went to some archive which has been retired. I would think someone here will have them. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5378cfb8.2000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The "New Microsoft" is embracing open source
There are a new "mindset" coming onboard now that are forming Class B corporations with the intent of doing right. Whether it will work or not remains to be seen, but people are waking up. I will be incorporating Keep America At Work in a few weeks and I am looking into the class b corporations, but it is not available in texas yet which means I would need to incorporate in Maryland or some other state, and I'm not sure I want to go that route yet. On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > El 16/05/14 14:24, Gene Wirchenko escribió: > >> At 16:52 2014-05-13, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >> >> BTW, have you noticed the ONLY reason offered in this post to go back to >>> MS is that now "they're listening"? >>> So we should change once again JUST because MS is listening? Why? >>> What are they offering besides a "listening" that they can end any time >>> they want to? What are they offering, that we don't already have, that >>> might justify the expense of moving back and the risk that they once again >>> stop listening some time in the future? >>> >> >> I have noticed businesses listening in the past. Too many times, >> that is all they do. You are given an opportunity to state your grievance, >> and then they have other customers to help. Listening without action is a >> waste of time. >> > > So what? Isn't bankruptcy a waste of time? Let's us ask Enron. > Medium or small companies operated by their owners may think this way. It > is the old way, owners being proud of their company and trying to make it > better. But corporate companies? It's just a bunch of directives concerned > only with their own interests, not the company's. And they do right, > because the company will fire them at a moment's notice, as soon as it is > convenient. So why wouldn't they also look to their own interests? > I think the whole corporate system is rotten. It cannot and will not > function properly, it is just a way for slippery smart people to make some > fast money. Companies should be directed by their owners, by people who > will be hurt if the company goes down, only then will the system work. > Until that time, all your notions of companies doing the convenient or > proper thing are a waste of time. Because the people running the company > are not the company and don't care about wasting the company's time, just > about their own interests. > > So once again. Why would we expect MS to keep on listening long enough to > make it worth our while to migrate back? And what would be the added > benefits to this migration? After all, the people we've migrated to are > also listening so you'll have to do much better than that. > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPuy6VMr7KR3z7x11u4Z+ic5uVu9MeHL=dA=obsdt6azz6a...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP support
Mike and anyone else that needs it. There are 3 hotfixes. But looking at the contents they are all the same. So only the last one is required. Also its 11mb so instead of emailing I will put it online here. www.gatwicksoftware.com/ukfug/VFP90SP2-KB968409-ENU.exe 5815 is the SP2 prior to updates. Should end up with 7423. Al -Original Message- Hi Al, Please send them to me. It appears this machine isn't fully patched. My VERSION(1) returns Visual FoxPro 09.00..5815 for Windows [Oct 15 2007 09:11:06] Product ID 76683-120-0083971-18373. Thanks, --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003101cf72b0$61de8fa0$259baee0$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP9SP2 hotfixes (was RE: VFP support)
On 2014-05-18 11:46, Allen wrote: Mike and anyone else that needs it. There are 3 hotfixes. But looking at the contents they are all the same. So only the last one is required. Also its 11mb so instead of emailing I will put it online here. www.gatwicksoftware.com/ukfug/VFP90SP2-KB968409-ENU.exe 5815 is the SP2 prior to updates. Should end up with 7423. Al Changed the subject so some poor soul in the future might find this in the archives. Also uploaded to the ProFox page (not sure if it will be allowed though since it's Microsoft's stuff, not mine); just in case, I uploaded a copy to my site too: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/vfp Thanks so much, Al! --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/690f84e5ab3c173ef901fdff76429...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The "New Microsoft" is embracing open source
On 2014-05-18 11:23, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: There are a new "mindset" coming onboard now that are forming Class B corporations with the intent of doing right. Whether it will work or not remains to be seen, but people are waking up. I will be incorporating Keep America At Work in a few weeks and I am looking into the class b corporations, but it is not available in texas yet which means I would need to incorporate in Maryland or some other state, and I'm not sure I want to go that route yet. Why Maryland? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a374951cbac6082e2a59701239373...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 hotfixes (was RE: VFP support)
It was freely available on the web site last time I looked so I don't think there is a problem. As long as you have a VFP9 license anyway Al -Original Message- Changed the subject so some poor soul in the future might find this in the archives. Also uploaded to the ProFox page (not sure if it will be allowed though since it's Microsoft's stuff, not mine); just in case, I uploaded a copy to my site too: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/vfp Thanks so much, Al! --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003501cf72b7$c3e489f0$4bad9dd0$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9SP2 hotfixes (was RE: VFP support)
On May 18, 2014, at 11:36 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: > Changed the subject so some poor soul in the future might find this in the > archives. Also uploaded to the ProFox page (not sure if it will be allowed > though since it's Microsoft's stuff, not mine); just in case, I uploaded a > copy to my site too: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/vfp Posted. -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/pgp-signature --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/07fb09d8-1aa0-498c-8bbe-8f2d3d67c...@rackspace.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-) On 2014-05-17 17:14, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: I developed my app on Win7; works great. I move it to an older WinXP computer for some not-my-machine testing...it fails with an Error 1691 on the SET LIBRARY TO VFPEncryption71.fll line. I researched the error and found this on Craig's site: http://www.sweetpotatosoftware.com/spsblog/2009/08/09/MajorVFPEncryptionUpdate.aspx 'If you are getting a "FLL is Invalid" error when running either of these FLLs it is because you are missing the runtimes on the system you are deploying your application on. What about the previous vfpencryption.fll that used the VC++ 8.0 runtimes? I continue to update to the latest Visual Studio (10.0 will be next) and I suggest you do the same. Most VFP developers are using the vfpencryption71.fll as the C runtime matches the one used for VFP 9.0 (msvcr71.dll) and it provides the exact same functionality as vfpencryption.fll.' I just went and downloaded the latest onto the test machinesame error. My VFP runtime files are right there in the application's folder, which is c:\MBSS\FabMate, along with the latest VFPEncryption71.fll. Ideas? tia, --Mike [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3a0ef253d1b71d3b919bf4001423f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The "New Microsoft" is embracing open source
No idea Apparently that is the first state to offer it based on what i read Legalzoom.com does not offer it at all On May 18, 2014 11:39 AM, wrote: > On 2014-05-18 11:23, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > >> There are a new "mindset" coming onboard now that are forming Class B >> corporations with the intent of doing right. >> >> Whether it will work or not remains to be seen, but people are waking up. >> >> I will be incorporating Keep America At Work in a few weeks and I am >> looking into the class b corporations, but it is not available in texas >> yet >> which means I would need to incorporate in Maryland or some other state, >> and I'm not sure I want to go that route yet. >> > > > Why Maryland? > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capuy6vpms3bovk8-qu3pnr+nca35-f2wzsd5odyr6kpoknq...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for some reason only sends one out. Al -Original Message- Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003601cf72c1$4b792980$e26b7c80$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
msvcr71.dll and what's the other one? On 2014-05-18 13:47, Allen wrote: There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for some reason only sends one out. Al -Original Message- Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have lives, but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). :-) [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b7badfdb5e47afe3938e014e1db6d...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
On May 18, 2014 1:52:18 PM EDT, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: msvcr71.dll and what's the other one? On 2014-05-18 13:47, Allen wrote: > There are 2 dll's for C++ so make sure you have them both. VFP for > some > reason only sends one out. > Al > > -Original Message- > > Any clues, Profoxers? I realize it's the weekend and you all have > lives, > but hopefully one or two of you don't (and can help with this one). > :-) > > Mike, Load the FLL into this tool. It will tell you what is needed. http://www.dependencywalker.com/ -- Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c7c2a934-7cb3-443e-94b5-bf95eed75...@email.android.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
On 2014-05-18 13:56, Tracy Pearson wrote: Mike, Load the FLL into this tool. It will tell you what is needed. http://www.dependencywalker.com/ Thanks, Tracy! Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this? Here's the screenshot of the error messages: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9246e5fbd9a82f817432369bbacac...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run
Think you're ok. Just copy the missing file over Al -Original Message- Thanks, Tracy! Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this? Here's the screenshot of the error messages: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01cf72c6$7aaec980$700c5c80$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP9SP2 app not liking VFPEncryption71.fll in WinXP test run (RESOLVED!!)
Yep, just copying the MSVCP71.DLL into the app folder fixed it. THANKS A TON, LADS!!! On 2014-05-18 14:24, Allen wrote: Think you're ok. Just copy the missing file over Al -Original Message- Thanks, Tracy! Looks like MSVCP71.DLL is what I'm missing. The other messages in bold red...makes me wonder if I'll have an issue besides this? Here's the screenshot of the error messages: http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/images/dependency_for_vfpencryption71.png [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b88b0186d726ee38f087b604008ef...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP support
Thanks Al John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 > Mike and anyone else that needs it. > There are 3 hotfixes. But looking at the contents they are all the same. So > only the last one is required. Also its 11mb so instead of emailing I will put it > online here. > www.gatwicksoftware.com/ukfug/VFP90SP2-KB968409-ENU.exe > > 5815 is the SP2 prior to updates. Should end up with 7423. > > Al ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002c01cf72d2$d1c28ac0$7547a040$@johnweller.co.uk ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
MBSS FabNet -- VFP9SP2 app using MariaDB backend over web
Folks, I've created this app that I'm opening up for public beta testing, if you'd like to have a go at it. It's an estimating software that's designed especially for miscellaneous metal fabricators, and is an evolution of my FabMate product that I created back in 2003. http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/fabnet/FabNet_setup.exe Right now, it's just access to the lookup table libraries. More to come. This is using an n-tier approach where the app UI/bizRules/DataObj are VFP9SP2, and it's hitting a MySQL (MariaDB) test database backend on the web. Special thanks to Kurt Wendt for beating this yesterday for me! Oh...almost forgot. Credentials are PROFOX/12345/PROFOX/Testing (uid/pwd/client/database) All feedback welcomed. Thanks!! --Mike ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1ad5bd8b6854fb7b744b05aaa...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: MBSS FabNet -- VFP9SP2 app using MariaDB backend over web
Ur quite welcome Mike! I might just beat it up a Tad more 2morrow... :-) -K- Sent from my iPhone > On May 18, 2014, at 5:38 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com > wrote: > > Folks, > > I've created this app that I'm opening up for public beta testing, if you'd > like to have a go at it. It's an estimating software that's designed > especially for miscellaneous metal fabricators, and is an evolution of my > FabMate product that I created back in 2003. > > http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com/downloads/fabnet/FabNet_setup.exe > > Right now, it's just access to the lookup table libraries. More to come. > This is using an n-tier approach where the app UI/bizRules/DataObj are > VFP9SP2, and it's hitting a MySQL (MariaDB) test database backend on the web. > > Special thanks to Kurt Wendt for beating this yesterday for me! > > Oh...almost forgot. Credentials are PROFOX/12345/PROFOX/Testing > (uid/pwd/client/database) > > All feedback welcomed. > > Thanks!! > --Mike > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0840a782-8205-4efc-96d4-c40bc0bb2...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Fox.wikis.com down
Still not fixed by now (Hong Kong Time)! On 18 May 2014 22:53, wrote: > Somebody needs to get word to Steve Black that the Fox wikis is down: > Processing Error - wiki~VisualFoxProWiki -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=mjbfswa7o42-978d2uowwlt++12ygy+h24swyp8hsnt...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Fox.wikis.com down
That old 2GB limit ... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1400480326.6847.118899661.3fe69...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
