date:20171205

Paul, you got it wrong. And you should have noticed it by your own: 
Intellisense doesn't show a native  Addproperty Method inside of _vfp.  
AddProperty is a regular Function:

ADDPROPERTY(_vfp, "test", 2)

This will work, but as I mentioned before: _VFP a score engine doesn't expect 
to get messed with, therefor the _VFP intellisense doesn't show that new 
member, but it stil is accessible.

wOOdy


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Newton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 09:35
An: profox@leafe.com
Betreff: RE: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

Eric

I think you must be mistaken ... I tried that with _VFP.AddProperty("Test",2) 
and got an OLE error code 0x80020006 Unknown name

Paul


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002701d36da5$bc191c30$344b5490$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

2017-12-05 Thread Paul Newton

Mea culpa ... but it was Eric who wrote:

You can _VFP.AddProperty, and the property can be an object

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen 
Wondzinski
Sent: 05 December 2017 08:48
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: AW: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

Paul, you got it wrong. And you should have noticed it by your own: 
Intellisense doesn't show a native  Addproperty Method inside of _vfp.  
AddProperty is a regular Function:

ADDPROPERTY(_vfp, "test", 2)

This will work, but as I mentioned before: _VFP a score engine doesn't expect 
to get messed with, therefor the _VFP intellisense doesn't show that new 
member, but it stil is accessible.

wOOdy

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Newton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 09:35
An: profox@leafe.com
Betreff: RE: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

Eric

I think you must be mistaken ... I tried that with _VFP.AddProperty("Test",2) 
and got an OLE error code 0x80020006 Unknown name

Paul

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002701d36da5$bc191c30$344b5490$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/002701d36da5$bc191c30$344b5490$@wondzinski.de
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/by2pr0201mb1797b9e20516e22baa3966c8a1...@by2pr0201mb1797.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

Touché ! :)


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Newton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 10:21
An: profox@leafe.com
Betreff: RE: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

Mea culpa ... but it was Eric who wrote:

You can _VFP.AddProperty, and the property can be an object


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004601d36dac$926177a0$b72466e0$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver 
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/02fb01d36dde$a53975d0$efac6170$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Crozier

Avast Free version has always worked for us here. You can turn bits on and off 
and the standard installation like most others asks you if you want to install 
14 day trials etc but just dismiss them all. Only requirement is to register 
once every 12 months.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H. Tarver
Sent: 05 December 2017 15:35
To: ProFox@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something 
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been testing 
BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version and 
upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't let me 
exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something 
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during compilation 
(it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable to write to the 
path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to create a dbcbuilder 
file used by my applications, not only does it crash it trashes the DBC file 
being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files to 
no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process 
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2bea6f...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP


On 2017-12-05 10:35, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? 
If

so, what's the recommended tool.



I'd love to hear folks answers too.  I've used Avast with pretty good 
success.  AVG Free before that.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1aa4b1ca9fea44a61e9e9f832ec6c...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Crozier

Used to prefer Abut it became too big and paralysed your machine so switched 
about 18 months ago. So far no issues with Avast at all. May well revisit AVG 
on my home PC's though, either that or TotalAV which seems to be getting rave 
reviews.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 05 December 2017 15:59
To: ProFox Email List 
Subject: Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

On 2017-12-05 10:35, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> 2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? 
> If
> so, what's the recommended tool.

I'd love to hear folks answers too.  I've used Avast with pretty good success.  
AVG Free before that.

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/18725b8cd2d5d247873a2baf401d4ab2bea6f...@ex2010-a-fpl.fpl.LOCAL
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

AVG is what I'm trying to get away from. The nag screens are becoming too
much for my clients to deal with, I've had multiple client inadvertently
install either the trial edition or their Tuneup tool. Speaking of which I
had a client call me yesterday who had installed the AVG Tune Up Tool, and
when it ran it told him he had multiple versions of the same files on his
hard drive (owing to the fact that he had an old pc's data copied to a
folder on his hard drive), and when it prompted him to get rid of those
multiple files, he agreed and it deleted several binary files that were
required to run his programs. Shadow copies to the rescue! And don't get me
started about their Secure Browsing addin for browsers. 

Anyway I figured I'd had a good run with AVG and needed a new alternative to
recommend and so far I've been relatively pleased with BitDefender, but if
it breaks my compile process and it comes down to BitDefender or VFP, then
Bitdefender's gotta go. 

PS: I am a reseller for AVG and sell large corporate clients the Network
Licenses for multiple users. We have no issues with the paid Business
Version of AVG. It's just the free stuff I'm trying to get around. However,
given the fact that I bought the full version of BitDefender to get around
issues with their free version, maybe I already have my answer. 

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 9:59 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

On 2017-12-05 10:35, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> 2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? 
> If
> so, what's the recommended tool.

I'd love to hear folks answers too.  I've used Avast with pretty good
success.  AVG Free before that.

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/03a601d36de3$79c84c50$6d58e4f0$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP


On 2017-12-05 11:06, Dave Crozier wrote:

Used to prefer Abut it became too big and paralysed your machine so
switched about 18 months ago. So far no issues with Avast at all. May
well revisit AVG on my home PC's though, either that or TotalAV which
seems to be getting rave reviews.




Most likely, I switched from AVG to Avast for the same reasons you 
mentioned above, Dave!


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4711797d361b76b1a09b51adff830...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?

We are being pushed hard to jump to the cloud and I don't know how we are
goig to do a lot of the necessary things around the ERP that we do.  We are
told it is a SaaS experience and we are disconnected from a direct
db hookup.   There is a tool they wrote, ION, and we will have to work
through that.

Happy Happy Joy Joy!

Not sure how we are going to roll our pricing update at the end of each
month.
-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyjb_hmu0z02s1ezo6b8lkr8jn+j-fbf9pqk_bfs9ny...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

2017-12-05 Thread Ed Leafe

On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Stephen Russell  wrote:

> If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?

"The Cloud" – one of the most ill-defined terms ever.

There are several layers at which you interact with cloud resources, typically 
called *aaS. Examples: IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), SaaS (Software as a 
Service), and PaaS (Platform as a Service). A good graphic depicting the 
differences is here:

https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-637bb1028c20355020dc6bc9dc4c783a-c

I prefer the much more relatable visualization of the different levels:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bw-NkNDCcAAatyf.png


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  application/pgp-signature
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/42164bc8-df8c-4a88-9a55-409800f0e...@leafe.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Darren

I've been using the Bitdefender for maybe 4 years now with zero issue re
VFP. The only fox related issue is with Refox, which I use rarely, and that
was getting blocked. Added an exception in the "Advanced Threat Defense"
module and sweet from there.

 
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H.
Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005701d36de7$b3fe3250$1bfa96f0$@ozemail.com.au
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

So has anyone tried TotalAV yet? Does it play well with the Fox?

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Crozier
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 10:06 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Used to prefer Abut it became too big and paralysed your machine so switched
about 18 months ago. So far no issues with Avast at all. May well revisit
AVG on my home PC's though, either that or TotalAV which seems to be getting
rave reviews.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 05 December 2017 15:59
To: ProFox Email List 
Subject: Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

On 2017-12-05 10:35, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> 2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? 
> If
> so, what's the recommended tool.

I'd love to hear folks answers too.  I've used Avast with pretty good
success.  AVG Free before that.

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/044601d36de8$89826220$9c872660$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

2017-12-05 Thread Peter Cushing

On 05/12/2017 16:39, Ed Leafe wrote:

I prefer the much more relatable visualization of the different levels:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bw-NkNDCcAAatyf.png

I think on that diagram you need to take out Soda and substitute it for
Beer.
Also note that cheese is a given on a pizza, which IMHO is correct. Got
a weird friend who doesn't like cheese and tries to get his pizzas with
none!

Peter

This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. The contents are confidential and may be protected in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.

www.whisperingsmith.com

Whispering Smith Ltd Head Office:61 Great Ducie Street, Manchester M3 1RR.
Tel:0161 831 3700
Fax:0161 831 3715

London Office:17-19 Foley Street, London W1W 6DW Tel:0207 299 7960

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6b100ded-a857-5cbc-a48b-1220e3e08...@whisperingsmith.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP


+1 - but otoh Windows Defender now seems to be as good as it gets.

On 05-Dec-2017 9:14 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:

Avast Free version has always worked for us here. You can turn bits on and off 
and the standard installation like most others asks you if you want to install 
14 day trials etc but just dismiss them all. Only requirement is to register 
once every 12 months.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H. Tarver
Sent: 05 December 2017 15:35
To: ProFox@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something 
similar.

  




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2823f087-017b-22be-1b54-385aa7c24...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

2017-12-05 Thread Ted Roche

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Russell  wrote:
>
> We are being pushed hard to jump to the cloud and

I'm in a fog most days; does that count?

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4vml+jqz2eh2-tdovkuyz6pzdzfqupbqf491ioyaxg...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

The inability to acquire a direct connection to a database is severely
limiting  in a thousand ways. It great affects my core business and forces
us to find ways to use standard reports saved to files for processing or if
possible custom exports to discrete export files if exporting is even
allowed in the ERP. God forbid, the erp that only saves reports as PDF
files. 

I fear this will be a bigger and bigger issue going forward unless something
changes. 

Can you get VPN access to the server data via the cloud provider? I have
seen some that make that option available (with an additional fee, of
course).

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 



-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen
Russell
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 10:32 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?

We are being pushed hard to jump to the cloud and I don't know how we are
goig to do a lot of the necessary things around the ERP that we do.  We are
told it is a SaaS experience and we are disconnected from a direct
db hookup.   There is a tool they wrote, ION, and we will have to work
through that.

Happy Happy Joy Joy!

Not sure how we are going to roll our pricing update at the end of each
month.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/045301d36de9$f47767f0$dd6637d0$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Darren

Just tried  GENDBC - copied a database and files to location away from dev
(different drive). Ran the GENDBC from the command window without parameters
and selected Database and Target prg at the subsequent prompts. Worked as
expected. Have the prg,  fxp and krt files - no corruption of the DBC.
Currently using Bitdefender Total Security 2018.

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H.
Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005b01d36dea$53a2cf30$fae86d90$@ozemail.com.au
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ted Roche  wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Russell 
> wrote:
> >
> > We are being pushed hard to jump to the cloud and
>
> I'm in a fog most days; does that count?
>
> --
>

Dilly Dilly!

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYKKYOv6-Z6q2r1Qbfw0rvCEqyR2TCKMmuk3_dva=7c...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

We need to populate our DW that mingles all 5 of our companies in the ERP
into an easy digest series of cubes.  That is one of our Oh How are we
going to do this.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> The inability to acquire a direct connection to a database is severely
> limiting  in a thousand ways. It great affects my core business and forces
> us to find ways to use standard reports saved to files for processing or if
> possible custom exports to discrete export files if exporting is even
> allowed in the ERP. God forbid, the erp that only saves reports as PDF
> files.
>
> I fear this will be a bigger and bigger issue going forward unless
> something
> changes.
>
> Can you get VPN access to the server data via the cloud provider? I have
> seen some that make that option available (with an additional fee, of
> course).
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Email: p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> Stephen
> Russell
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 10:32 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?
>
> If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?
>
> We are being pushed hard to jump to the cloud and I don't know how we are
> goig to do a lot of the necessary things around the ERP that we do.  We are
> told it is a SaaS experience and we are disconnected from a direct
> db hookup.   There is a tool they wrote, ION, and we will have to work
> through that.
>
> Happy Happy Joy Joy!
>
> Not sure how we are going to roll our pricing update at the end of each
> month.
> --
> Stephen Russell
> Sr. Analyst
> Ring Container Technology
> Oakland TN
>
> 901.246-0159 cell
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYK9JBUjaTPd9HGem9oNde7OzBtKDNMZfthMFOoE19P=e...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

2017-12-05 Thread Kurt at VR-FX


Hey Ed - I TOO Really like the Pizza Viz!


On 12/5/2017 11:39 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:

On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Stephen Russell  wrote:


If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?

"The Cloud" – one of the most ill-defined terms ever.

There are several layers at which you interact with cloud resources, typically 
called *aaS. Examples: IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), SaaS (Software as a 
Service), and PaaS (Platform as a Service). A good graphic depicting the 
differences is here:

https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-637bb1028c20355020dc6bc9dc4c783a-c

I prefer the much more relatable visualization of the different levels:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bw-NkNDCcAAatyf.png


-- Ed Leafe







--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/signed
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   application/pgp-signature
---


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/71f96771-67f8-ee92-8453-577426709...@optonline.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Ed Leafe  wrote:

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Stephen Russell 
> wrote:
>
> > If so which service and what tools are you liking so far?
>
> "The Cloud" – one of the most ill-defined terms ever.
>
> There are several layers at which you interact with cloud resources,
> typically called *aaS. Examples: IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), SaaS
> (Software as a Service), and PaaS (Platform as a Service). A good graphic
> depicting the differences is here:
>
> https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-637bb1028c20355020dc6bc9dc4c783a-c
>
> I prefer the much more relatable visualization of the different levels:
>
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bw-NkNDCcAAatyf.png
>
> ---

I agree Ed that cloud is a misnomer.  I have heard that we are going to a
SaaS and the vendor is responsible for everything.  That scares me big
time, in that too many issues come up that require us to reset services or
reboot the whole ERP maybe every other month at worst.  In reality, we have
locks set in one system because of human operation of closing the order to
move it to Warehousing.  Our Logistics service may want to tell us what
carrier to use and the record in SO is already closed.  Or we are printing
checks/invoices and a print job fails to close completely grabbing 25% of
cpu in a failed operation that needs to be manually cleaned on the server.

I was looking at defining our DW in our own separate cloud and identify an
ION pump to push nightly updates there.  This secondary cloud will
probably be AZURE because everything we have was built in SQL Server and
Analysis Services

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+uMBLBC+Xy5X=j78wwqq8bucrovmxcsy6mufdh4xu...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Listbox auto-magically filters unwanted characters

2017-12-05 Thread Man-wai Chang

I found that in WIndows 10 Home Premium, the system locale Big5 might
cause VFP's listbox not to display a row of data. When the locale was
English, all records were displayed without losing one.

Is it an expected behavior?

-- 
 .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=mjafg0a97dmpz2qcu6ogt7tagzhsnqngrqrih+10rv1...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

It may be complicated by the fact that I have a shared folder on my local
drive mapped to a drive letter (it's an old concept that I've been doing for
years and it works for me so I won't try to justify it). All I know is every
time I try to compile or run GENDBC, the process fails at the point of the
creation of the new file UNTIL I turn off Bitdefender. The corruption of the
DBC may just be a side-effect of the crashed program. Don't know anything
other than the fact that I immediately have to restore the DBC if I forget
to turn off Bitdefender. 

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 



-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 10:59 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just tried  GENDBC - copied a database and files to location away from dev
(different drive). Ran the GENDBC from the command window without parameters
and selected Database and Target prg at the subsequent prompts. Worked as
expected. Have the prg,  fxp and krt files - no corruption of the DBC.
Currently using Bitdefender Total Security 2018.

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H.
Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04d201d36dee$b22af4c0$1680de40$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Windows 10 Home edition (was Re: Listbox auto-magically filters unwanted characters)


On 2017-12-05 12:27, Man-wai Chang wrote:

I found that in WIndows 10 Home Premium, the system locale Big5 might
cause VFP's listbox not to display a row of data. When the locale was
English, all records were displayed without losing one.

Is it an expected behavior?



I thought I heard that Home edition didn't work as well with VFP apps.  
Is that true?


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3f1d381c4b37bac259e83f9bd4389...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)


On 2017-12-05 11:46, Paul H. Tarver wrote:

So has anyone tried TotalAV yet? Does it play well with the Fox?



Haven't tried that one.  A client of mine's Corporate entity wants to 
use Kaspersky AV.  I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying 
away from KAV because of concerns over the head dude there somehow being 
tied to Putin and the Kremlin.  (paranoia?)


I thought I had heard somebody here years ago say that Kaspersky wasn't 
a good AV for Fox apps.  Of course things change over time so maybe 
that's not the case now.  In any case, if you can program exclusions, 
that'd be best.


Anybody got comments on Kaspersky?

tia,
--Mike

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ed81cee5f917dce161a73f732a9c3...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?


and you really have end-users that understand cubes?

On 05-Dec-2017 10:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:

We need to populate our DW that mingles all 5 of our companies in the ERP
into an easy digest series of cubes.  That is one of our Oh How are we
going to do this.





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/43b637b8-c786-ceb8-385e-568760f0c...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)

FYI, we moved away from Kaspersky because we heard a story about them having
some malware or otherware hitching a ride on their installation and the only
way that could have happened was if someone had access to their source code
or development systems. I don't think that qualified as paranoia, but I'm
not above being wrong. At least that's what the voices tell me. :)

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 



-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:46 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)

On 2017-12-05 11:46, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> So has anyone tried TotalAV yet? Does it play well with the Fox?


Haven't tried that one.  A client of mine's Corporate entity wants to use
Kaspersky AV.  I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying away from
KAV because of concerns over the head dude there somehow being tied to Putin
and the Kremlin.  (paranoia?)

I thought I had heard somebody here years ago say that Kaspersky wasn't a
good AV for Fox apps.  Of course things change over time so maybe that's not
the case now.  In any case, if you can program exclusions, that'd be best.

Anybody got comments on Kaspersky?

tia,
--Mike

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/051801d36df1$7de32360$79a96a20$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)

Have used them for 7-10 years now.  MalwareBytes as well.

They offer a rebate on 3 unit purchase all the time so your cost is tiny.

Have not had any problems with their product. I can run my old FPD app on
my laptop and it works.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> FYI, we moved away from Kaspersky because we heard a story about them
> having
> some malware or otherware hitching a ride on their installation and the
> only
> way that could have happened was if someone had access to their source code
> or development systems. I don't think that qualified as paranoia, but I'm
> not above being wrong. At least that's what the voices tell me. :)
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Email: p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:46 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)
>
> On 2017-12-05 11:46, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
> > So has anyone tried TotalAV yet? Does it play well with the Fox?
>
>
> Haven't tried that one.  A client of mine's Corporate entity wants to use
> Kaspersky AV.  I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying away from
> KAV because of concerns over the head dude there somehow being tied to
> Putin
> and the Kremlin.  (paranoia?)
>
> I thought I had heard somebody here years ago say that Kaspersky wasn't a
> good AV for Fox apps.  Of course things change over time so maybe that's
> not
> the case now.  In any case, if you can program exclusions, that'd be best.
>
> Anybody got comments on Kaspersky?
>
> tia,
> --Mike
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmy+814weutshsmf2yjxsh+hyq9e32+ik5gg7n3_y_ps...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)


On 2017-12-05 12:55, Stephen Russell wrote:

Have used them for 7-10 years now.  MalwareBytes as well.

They offer a rebate on 3 unit purchase all the time so your cost is 
tiny.


Have not had any problems with their product. I can run my old FPD app 
on

my laptop and it works.



Wow...you run something to do with FoxPro?  LOL

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/8fbae2cad87b63ce1ac2b06ddc19c...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: [NF] Anyone working within the cloud?

We have end users that love dashboards and others who do understand that
the cube has the pre-joined data they need.  That cube user is at least
35-50% of our users of data.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:47 AM, AndyHC  wrote:

> and you really have end-users that understand cubes?
>
> On 05-Dec-2017 10:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> We need to populate our DW that mingles all 5 of our companies in the ERP
>> into an easy digest series of cubes.  That is one of our Oh How are we
>> going to do this.
>>
>>
>> 
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmy+-4h0smkqxcny8kkxvvpwr0b29vdpwhkzygz+o1dh...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)

Every 3 or 5 years I get a call on my old software that was written
1990-92

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:00 PM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:

> On 2017-12-05 12:55, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> Have used them for 7-10 years now.  MalwareBytes as well.
>>
>> They offer a rebate on 3 unit purchase all the time so your cost is tiny.
>>
>> Have not had any problems with their product. I can run my old FPD app on
>> my laptop and it works.
>>
>
>
> Wow...you run something to do with FoxPro?  LOL
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMY+M0KSrnAtb0==dg5hmpkh6lqw4pkgorcggusu-brt...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: Windows 10 Home edition (was Re: Listbox auto-magically filters unwanted characters)

ah that "I thought I heard"   How rumors are given birth.

Nope, there's absolutely no difference between Windows Home and Windows Pro
in regard of VFP9 

wOOdy


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 18:39
An: ProFox Email List 
Betreff: Windows 10 Home edition (was Re: Listbox auto-magically filters
unwanted characters)

On 2017-12-05 12:27, Man-wai Chang wrote:


I thought I heard that Home edition didn't work as well with VFP apps.  
Is that true?



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004101d36df9$372bad90$a58308b0$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: Listbox auto-magically filters unwanted characters

I never used any other locale than English and German, thus it would be hard
to simulate that for me. 
Why not ask the chinese VFP Guru from "VFP Advanced"?  He might even have a
patch for that!
On http://www.baiyujia.com/vfpadvanced/f_vfpa_about.asp  see point 5.

wOOdy



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Man-wai Chang
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 18:28
An: ProFox Email List 
Betreff: Listbox auto-magically filters unwanted characters

I found that in WIndows 10 Home Premium, the system locale Big5 might
cause VFP's listbox not to display a row of data. When the locale was
English, all records were displayed without losing one.

Is it an expected behavior?

-- 
 .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/004401d36df9$e001b950$a0052bf0$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP


On 2017-12-05 11:55, AndyHC wrote:

+1 - but otoh Windows Defender now seems to be as good as it gets.



So it wouldn't make any sense to have Defender *AND* something else, 
right?


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/116244d49e0210bacd319215b5b7f...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

AW: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just my 2 cents... Since several years I'm running without any other
additional AntiVirus Crap. The builtin Windows Defender from Win10 is
absolutely on par with all those other gimmiks. And it is integrated
seamlessly into the filestack, thus causing no additional trouble or
performance bottlenecks.

wOOdy




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/009501d36dfb$ba707f30$2f517d90$@wondzinski.de
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Tracy Pearson

I know the customers we have had seen plenty of corrupted CDX, blocked
ActiveX controls, record creation errors due to the file (opened Exclusive
in VFP) is in use from all sorts of anti-virus software programs. (Used
ProcMonitor by SysInternals to prove it)
Kaspersky, BitBlocker, AVG, Norton all stick in my mind right now.
We've seen issues when there is multiple anti-virus programs installed.
Even when the software is "not working since it is no longer registered",
our customers have these issues.

Avast has been recently removed from my personal systems since it pops up
adverts for more of their tools (which I find useless for me).

Windows defenders work for me.

As for developing, I have a VM I do most of my code with. I don't use any
internet in the VM, so I feel Windows Defender is enough there. 
My desktop at the office, uses Windows Defender. We used to have other
tools. The network admin decided Windows Defenders was good enough for the
desktops in the office. 

That's my thoughts on the subject.

Tracy


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jürgen
Wondzinski
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:03 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: AW: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just my 2 cents... Since several years I'm running without any other
additional AntiVirus Crap. The builtin Windows Defender from Win10 is
absolutely on par with all those other gimmiks. And it is integrated
seamlessly into the filestack, thus causing no additional trouble or
performance bottlenecks.

wOOdy




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000d01d36e05$ea72a4b0$bf57ee10$@powerchurch.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)

2017-12-05 Thread Bill Anderson

>>  I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying away from KAV because
of concerns over the head dude there somehow being tied to Putin and the
Kremlin.  (paranoia?)<<

Not difficult to find...

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/13/us-government-bans-kaspersky-lab-russian-spying
https://www.wired.com/story/kaspersky-russia-antivirus/
https://www.wired.com/story/nsa-contractors-hacking-tools/

Bill Anderson

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:45 AM,  wrote:

> On 2017-12-05 11:46, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
>
>> So has anyone tried TotalAV yet? Does it play well with the Fox?
>>
>
>
> Haven't tried that one.  A client of mine's Corporate entity wants to use
> Kaspersky AV.  I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying away from
> KAV because of concerns over the head dude there somehow being tied to
> Putin and the Kremlin.  (paranoia?)
>
> I thought I had heard somebody here years ago say that Kaspersky wasn't a
> good AV for Fox apps.  Of course things change over time so maybe that's
> not the case now.  In any case, if you can program exclusions, that'd be
> best.
>
> Anybody got comments on Kaspersky?
>
> tia,
> --Mike
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ca+o1engeu7gk+ffsxkdvesecnfcvzrvznz52a+0jnzqgxfa...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread José Enrique Llopis


Same here, no problem with BitDefender in four or five years.

Jose Enrique Llopis



-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Darren
Enviado el: martes, 05 de diciembre de 2017 17:40
Para: profox@leafe.com
Asunto: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

I've been using the Bitdefender for maybe 4 years now with zero issue re
VFP. The only fox related issue is with Refox, which I use rarely, and that
was getting blocked. Added an exception in the "Advanced Threat Defense"
module and sweet from there.

 
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H.
Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/45B879EC05D64B43AB333AE3955CF36E@LENOVO1
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Someone mentioned potential conflicts with multiple AV systems. I just
realized that I had both BitDefender and MalwareBytes installed. I was
assuming these were doing different jobs, but I've removed Malwarebytes now
and will see if that is what is causing the conflict. No other AV tools
installed so If this doesn't solve it, not sure what else I can. 

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 


-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of José
Enrique Llopis
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:43 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP


Same here, no problem with BitDefender in four or five years.

Jose Enrique Llopis



-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Darren Enviado el:
martes, 05 de diciembre de 2017 17:40
Para: profox@leafe.com
Asunto: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

I've been using the Bitdefender for maybe 4 years now with zero issue re
VFP. The only fox related issue is with Refox, which I use rarely, and that
was getting blocked. Added an exception in the "Advanced Threat Defense"
module and sweet from there.

 
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul H.
Tarver
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
similar. 

 

I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
let me exclude processes or files or folders. 

 

However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
trashes the DBC file being processed. 

 

I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off for
15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
without any problems. 

 

So here's my questions:

 

1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
be more friendly to VFP?

2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
so, what's the recommended tool.

 

Thanks!

 

Paul H. Tarver
  p...@tpcqpc.com

 

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00e101d36e0d$183ce2f0$48b6a8d0$@tpcqpc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection

2017-12-05 Thread Eric Selje

Yes, sorry, thanks for correcting that.  I do it all the time and yet still
don't get the syntax right. ;)

Eric

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Jürgen Wondzinski 
wrote:

> Touché ! :)
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Newton
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 10:21
> An: profox@leafe.com
> Betreff: RE: Adding an object to the _VFP.Objects collection
>
> Mea culpa ... but it was Eric who wrote:
>
> You can _VFP.AddProperty, and the property can be an object
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAAwxvUnV_7rLCS7E=J0=7yFO8jM-9xKBWCQGMmKZ4Ts-r19=7...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)


On 2017-12-05 15:28, Bill Anderson wrote:
 I know at my govt gig we are specifically staying away from KAV 
because
of concerns over the head dude there somehow being tied to Putin and 
the

Kremlin.  (paranoia?)<<

Not difficult to find...

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/13/us-government-bans-kaspersky-lab-russian-spying
https://www.wired.com/story/kaspersky-russia-antivirus/
https://www.wired.com/story/nsa-contractors-hacking-tools/

Bill Anderson



Excellent...thanks, Bill.  I didn't realize Best Buy and Office Depot 
stores had pulled the Kaspersky products.  More ammunition for not using 
it.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/3941f83dd7bb9fa92cac6e6807c47...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

2017-12-05 Thread Laurie Alvey

Windows Defender works for me -no probs.

Laurie

On 5 December 2017 at 21:07, Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> Someone mentioned potential conflicts with multiple AV systems. I just
> realized that I had both BitDefender and MalwareBytes installed. I was
> assuming these were doing different jobs, but I've removed Malwarebytes now
> and will see if that is what is causing the conflict. No other AV tools
> installed so If this doesn't solve it, not sure what else I can.
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Email: p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of José
> Enrique Llopis
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:43 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
>
> Same here, no problem with BitDefender in four or five years.
>
> Jose Enrique Llopis
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Darren Enviado
> el:
> martes, 05 de diciembre de 2017 17:40
> Para: profox@leafe.com
> Asunto: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
> I've been using the Bitdefender for maybe 4 years now with zero issue re
> VFP. The only fox related issue is with Refox, which I use rarely, and that
> was getting blocked. Added an exception in the "Advanced Threat Defense"
> module and sweet from there.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul
> H.
> Tarver
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
> Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into something
> similar.
>
>
>
> I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been
> testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free version
> and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free version didn't
> let me exclude processes or files or folders.
>
>
>
> However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently something
> BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does during
> compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error about unable
> to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my modified GENDBC.prg to
> create a dbcbuilder file used by my applications, not only does it crash it
> trashes the DBC file being processed.
>
>
>
> I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding files
> to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and turn it off
> for
> 15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation process
> without any problems.
>
>
>
> So here's my questions:
>
>
>
> 1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
> be more friendly to VFP?
>
> 2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
> so, what's the recommended tool.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Paul H. Tarver
>   p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAMvTR9f_Lcne_U78hyBs9VV0vk-4Rn+dWbZ-qA-=UBg9=ge...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

2 VFP sessions running; 1 hangs and so does the other


VFP9SP2 Win7Pro

Had a long running Quickbooks query from VFP (via QODBC tool) take 
forever.  I launched a 2nd instance of VFP to work on something totally 
different.  While editing some code in a PRG, my 2nd VFP session hangs.  
I leave it, come back HOURS later, still hung.  Both VFP sessions.  I'm 
guessing this is because it's single-threaded (although I'll be the 
first to admit I'm not a threading expert).


Ideas?

Thanks,
--Curious in Maryland

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/da9b66b4dad442235caad61a603cd...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Check my wording on this and tell me if I'm right


On 2017-12-01 13:53, Frank Cazabon wrote:
Registry settings for the Server?  I can't change those.  That's 
Corporate area of responsibility.  For me to do that, it'd be like 
"crossing the streams" as far as they're concerned.  lol



LOL, I can't remember, but here are the instructions I have used in
the past, a quick read doesn't seem to imply it has to be done on the
server, but not sure:

1. Set OPLocks off for increased speed in multiuser systems

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRXSmb\Parameters\

set OplocksDisabled = 1

OplocksDisabled REG_DWORD 0 or 1
Default: 0 (not disabled)




Must be on the Server.  Checked the client's Win10Pro workstation and 
didn't see OplocksDisabled in the Registry.  I can't change their Server 
settings.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/f98b7ffc5a45c8522406a93db8c81...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Check my wording on this and tell me if I'm right

2017-12-05 Thread Frank Cazabon

My notes are from quite a few years ago, maybe it is no longer created by 
default. Maybe you could try creating it and see if it makes a difference

On 5 December 2017 21:21:18 GMT-04:00, 
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>On 2017-12-01 13:53, Frank Cazabon wrote:
>>> Registry settings for the Server?  I can't change those.  That's 
>>> Corporate area of responsibility.  For me to do that, it'd be like 
>>> "crossing the streams" as far as they're concerned.  lol
>>> 
>> LOL, I can't remember, but here are the instructions I have used in
>> the past, a quick read doesn't seem to imply it has to be done on the
>> server, but not sure:
>> 
>> 1. Set OPLocks off for increased speed in multiuser systems
>> 
>>
>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRXSmb\Parameters\
>> 
>> set OplocksDisabled = 1
>> 
>> OplocksDisabled REG_DWORD 0 or 1
>> Default: 0 (not disabled)
>
>
>
>Must be on the Server.  Checked the client's Win10Pro workstation and 
>didn't see OplocksDisabled in the Registry.  I can't change their
>Server 
>settings.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/d30a5b04-86c6-4829-9846-ff34e5285...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

I'm glad some others are having success with BitDefender, but as of two hours 
ago, I uninstalled this program from my computer and have moved on to testing 
TotalAV. The problems with BitDefender continued to get worse when I discovered 
that on Dec 3rd for some reason, BitDefender decided that Macrium Backup files 
were a danger and it deleted all of my local full, differential and incremental 
backups and was crashing Macrium each time it tried to run a scheduled backup. 

I ran a backup with BitDefender installed and it worked perfectly until the 
point where Macrium tried to finalize the backup file at which point 
BitDefender deleted the file as soon as it could get a record lock and before 
the Macrium could complete thus breaking the backup. This was on top of me 
having excluded the Macrium backup destination from BitDefender's scans. 
Apparently those exclusions are worthless. 

Interestingly enough, the issues I have had BitDefender when compiling VFP 
files, running gendbc and backing up my files locally seem to occur whenever 
the process tries to modify, write or rename the files being created or 
processed. Each time BitDefender jumps in and attempts to stop the process even 
though I've excluded programs and folders. 

I'm done with Bitdefender and my TotalAV review isn't going well either because 
after installing the program while trying to write this post, it continually 
tried to force me to buy before it would do anything. Looks like I'm going to 
Windows Security Essentials in the short term until another option makes itself 
available. 

Paul H. Tarver
Email: p...@tpcqpc.com 

-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Laurie Alvey
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 5:41 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Windows Defender works for me -no probs.

Laurie

On 5 December 2017 at 21:07, Paul H. Tarver  wrote:

> Someone mentioned potential conflicts with multiple AV systems. I just 
> realized that I had both BitDefender and MalwareBytes installed. I was 
> assuming these were doing different jobs, but I've removed 
> Malwarebytes now and will see if that is what is causing the conflict. 
> No other AV tools installed so If this doesn't solve it, not sure what else I 
> can.
>
> Paul H. Tarver
> Email: p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
> José Enrique Llopis
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 2:43 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
>
> Same here, no problem with BitDefender in four or five years.
>
> Jose Enrique Llopis
>
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Darren 
> Enviado
> el:
> martes, 05 de diciembre de 2017 17:40
> Para: profox@leafe.com
> Asunto: RE: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
> I've been using the Bitdefender for maybe 4 years now with zero issue 
> re VFP. The only fox related issue is with Refox, which I use rarely, 
> and that was getting blocked. Added an exception in the "Advanced Threat 
> Defense"
> module and sweet from there.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of 
> Paul H.
> Tarver
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 2:35 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP
>
> Just wanted to throw this out and see if anyone is running into 
> something similar.
>
>
>
> I have been wanting to find a new AV tool for my system and have been 
> testing BitDefender for the last few weeks. I started with the free 
> version and upgraded to the paid version after I realized the free 
> version didn't let me exclude processes or files or folders.
>
>
>
> However, since I've upgraded, I found that there is apparently 
> something BitDefender doesn't like about some of the stuff Foxpro does 
> during compilation (it crashes before completion and throws an error 
> about unable to write to the path). Alternatively, when I run my 
> modified GENDBC.prg to create a dbcbuilder file used by my 
> applications, not only does it crash it trashes the DBC file being processed.
>
>
>
> I've tried excluding VFP6 and VFP9 processes and I've tried excluding 
> files to no avail. The only solution is to go into BitDefender and 
> turn it off for
> 15 minutes or so and then I can complete the GENDBC or compilation 
> process without any problems.
>
>
>
> So here's my questions:
>
>
>
> 1)  Is there something I need to do different with BitDefender to make
> be more friendly to VFP?
>
> 2)  Should I just dump Bitdefender and go with a different AV tool? If
> so, what's the recommended tool.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Paul H. Tarver
>   p...@tpcqpc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   te

Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP

Well it depends on what the 'something' does - glancing at my desktop I 
see I have Malwarebytes, Microsoft Fixit, HiJack This* -
afaik they are all on-demand programs so there is no overhead. I don't 
have any other anti-virus software running.


   * Installed for some problems after updating to Win 10


On 06-Dec-2017 12:32 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:

On 2017-12-05 11:55, AndyHC wrote:

+1 - but otoh Windows Defender now seems to be as good as it gets.



So it wouldn't make any sense to have Defender *AND* something else, 
right?



[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9faf5c39-fe9a-373e-11ec-c8c87dc9c...@hawthorncottage.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Re: Kaspersky AV (was Re: BitDefender Doesn't Play Well With VFP)