Re: [NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2
XFS... XFS ... :) -- .~.http://changmw.homeip.net / v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.17.1 /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 6.06) 11:02:01 up 20:55 0 users ^ ^load average: 1.08 1.08 1.03 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 13:28 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2 On 6/28/06, Rodney Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/archive/2006/06/26/648075.aspx > Question #1: 'Is WinFS dead? Yes and No." Well, thanks for clearing that up. Whatever WinFS may have been, and that would depend which sources you were listeningt to, is not shipping as a feature in any OS they are willing to commit to, except maybe Cairo. What was WinFS supposed to be anyway? A search engine to kill Google Desktop, WIndows Desktop Search (formerly Apple Spotlight) or a new way to add metatags onto any object within the filesystem? Did anyone here have plans to use it? Killer apps to take advantage of it? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com === Good questions, Ted. The answers are Yes and No, depending on who you talk to. I think if M$ knew the answers, we would be that much closer to having WinFS in our hands. HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2
On 6/28/06, Rodney Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/archive/2006/06/26/648075.aspx Question #1: 'Is WinFS dead? Yes and No." Well, thanks for clearing that up. Whatever WinFS may have been, and that would depend which sources you were listeningt to, is not shipping as a feature in any OS they are willing to commit to, except maybe Cairo. What was WinFS supposed to be anyway? A search engine to kill Google Desktop, WIndows Desktop Search (formerly Apple Spotlight) or a new way to add metatags onto any object within the filesystem? Did anyone here have plans to use it? Killer apps to take advantage of it? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2
http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/archive/2006/06/26/648075.aspx Rodney Dixon McKee Foods Corportion P.O. Box 750 Collegedale TN 37315 Phone: (423)238-7111 x22629 == CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this electronic message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, disclosure, copying, downloading, or other use of the information is prohibited and unauthorized, and may be unlawful, regardless of address or routing. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of this message, including any attachments. == --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] WinFS is dead?, Part 2
http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/archive/2006/06/26/648075.aspx Rodney Dixon McKee Foods Corportion P.O. Box 750 Collegedale TN 37315 Phone: (423)238-7111 x22629 == CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this electronic message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, disclosure, copying, downloading, or other use of the information is prohibited and unauthorized, and may be unlawful, regardless of address or routing. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and permanently delete and destroy the original and any copies of this message, including any attachments. == --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html text/x-vcard --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
