Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Michael Hawksworth
It is possible that your system is being used as relay  (i.e. you send 
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]@leafe.com and if it is a relay it sends 
the email on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but looks to send it from leafe.com 
to the unwary).

You can test your email for this at a number of web sites (just look in 
google) but be warned, if you do relay they will blacklist you until you 
get a cleared test which could take you a few hours.  (If you use 
groupwise let me know off list as I may be able to help).

-- 
Michael Hawksworth
Visual Fox Solutions

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.foxpro.co.uk





___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 22, 2007, at 3:32 AM, Michael Hawksworth wrote:

 It is possible that your system is being used as relay  (i.e. you send
 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]@leafe.com and if it is a relay it sends
 the email on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but looks to send it from  
 leafe.com
 to the unwary).

Since his system is bouncing those emails, it's not likely.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 21, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 It just seems like there are much easier ways to harvest eMail
 addresses... hardly worth the programming time to do it this way. But
 I suppose they are just having fun.

http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/01/spam_is_back_an.html

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 22, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Michael Hawksworth wrote:

 It is possible that your system is being used as relay...


Thanks, but no --- I check it at ORDB every once in a while (because  
I made that mistake once).

Ken



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 22, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:

   http://redtape.msnbc.com/2007/01/spam_is_back_an.html

Good article -- amazing, though, how many of the comments at the  
bottom completely missed the point. Death to Spammers is useless  
when *you* are the spammer, infected with a bot.

Incidentally, I thought it wouldn't hurt to check my server for being  
an open relay again, even though I am positive it isn't. I was  
surprised to find ORDB.org had passed from the mortal coil.

  http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/18/154259from=rss

or: http://tinyurl.com/yl7hpt

Any still-free alternatives anybody knows (and trusts)?

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Richard Kaye
You can try this:

http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml

Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 Any still-free alternatives anybody knows (and trusts)?
   

-- 
Richard Kaye
Vice President
Artfact/RFC Systems
Voice: 617.219.1038
Fax:  617.219.1001

For the fastest response time, please send your support
queries to:

Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Australian Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This message has been checked for viruses before sending.
-



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 22, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:

 You can try this:

 http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml

 Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 Any still-free alternatives anybody knows (and trusts)?


thanks -- it says I am OK.


You know, I am beginning to think that this is the same problem  
Michael had a while ago. (I am searching the archives right now, but  
searching posts from Babcock is exhausting all of Ed's processing  
power!)

I think the situation was some spammer spoofed *his* domain as the  
one originating the posts, so he got all of the bounces. (Still  
waiting for the archives... Time to cut back on those posts, Michael!)

I checked my statistics from the eMail server, and I have rejected  
over 134,000 messages because of a unknown user account. Holy Smoke!  
(Still waiting... Ed, is that thing smoking?)

Might as well just ask! Michael: Did you find a solution? Did the  
situation ever resolve itself? How long did it take?

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 22, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 I think the situation was some spammer spoofed *his* domain as the
 one originating the posts,

OK, I finally found it, but it was Alan Lukachko, not Michael.  
(Fortunately MB responded a few times in the thread, so I found it.)

   http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/324871#0

It looks like there just isn't any solution. I just hope the flood  
slows to a trickle.

expletive deleted

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 On Jan 22, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 
 I think the situation was some spammer spoofed *his* domain as the
 one originating the posts,
 
 OK, I finally found it, but it was Alan Lukachko, not Michael.  
 (Fortunately MB responded a few times in the thread, so I found it.)
 
http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/324871#0
 
 It looks like there just isn't any solution. I just hope the flood  
 slows to a trickle.

Ya know, shotguns aren't just for leaving by the front door when some 
gorilla comes calling for your baby girl for her first car date

Of course, I may have a somewhat more conservative approach to this type 
of problem than others, so I'd better stop this before the OT police 
come tapping my phone lines.

Whil
(Who thinks a vigilante hunting down the top 50 spammers in the country 
would make a terrific story line.)


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread Alan Lukachko
Hello Ken,

He's an update. I checked with my hosting company Textdrive. They, as many
who replied on this list, said that there was not much I could do about the
spoofed e-mails. 

What I did (and this is not necessarily the solution) was to access my
e-mail through the Webmail interface on the Textdrive server. I would delete
any e-mail that was suspicious. Then I would download the e-mails using the
Outlook client. Over the course of a few weeks, the number of 'spoofed'
e-mails declined to the point that I now get only one or two a day.

I suspect what really happened is that the bot got discovered and was
deleted off the sending server or it was just not any more fun for the
perpetrator.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:07 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server


On Jan 22, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 I think the situation was some spammer spoofed *his* domain as the
 one originating the posts,

OK, I finally found it, but it was Alan Lukachko, not Michael.  
(Fortunately MB responded a few times in the thread, so I found it.)

   http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/324871#0

It looks like there just isn't any solution. I just hope the flood  
slows to a trickle.

expletive deleted

Ken


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-22 Thread MB Software Solutions
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 OK, I finally found it, but it was Alan Lukachko, not Michael.  
 (Fortunately MB responded a few times in the thread, so I found it.)
   

Glad to help (indirectly as it were).  g

-- 
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 I just don't understand what somebody has to gain by flooding my  
 server?

It's a spam bot. They keep generating all sorts of combinations,  
hoping that one or two will be legitimate.

A better question would be: what do they have to lose? Most likely  
this is coming from a zombie that has been infected, so it doesn't  
even cost them any CPU cycles or bandwidth.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 Hey -= == ==
 
 I'm just curious what's going on
 
 I flipped my KVM switch over to my server (for no particular reason),  
 and noticed my eMail server going wild. Somebody is sending mail  
 after mail to my server, to made-up users in my domain. the user  
 names aren't random, they all start with shethang, for example:  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and on and on.  All of the from IP's and domains  
 are being spoofed, so I can't blacklist any of it.

If you look up the 'from' chain, you'll eventually see the starting 
point of the email (the 'envelope', so to speak.) Are they all the same 
(probably likely) or different?

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:

 If you look up the 'from' chain, you'll eventually see the starting
 point of the email (the 'envelope', so to speak.) Are they all the  
 same
 (probably likely) or different?

Al I see on the server is the apparent from and IP. The messages  
are getting bounced, so can one look up the chain? How? (Or does it  
vary from mail server to mail server?)

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 21, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:


   A better question would be: what do they have to lose? Most likely
 this is coming from a zombie that has been infected, so it doesn't
 even cost them any CPU cycles or bandwidth.

It just seems like there are much easier ways to harvest eMail  
addresses... hardly worth the programming time to do it this way. But  
I suppose they are just having fun.

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 21, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 It just seems like there are much easier ways to harvest eMail
 addresses... hardly worth the programming time to do it this way. But
 I suppose they are just having fun.

No, it's not for fun. This is serious stuff. And as long as there is  
a huge supply of easily-compromised machines available, this route is  
much simpler than a centralized harvesting scheme.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 21, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:

   No, it's not for fun. This is serious stuff.

Yeah, I suppose.

I wonder when it is going to get bad enough that the powers decide  
that it is time to fundamentally redesign how eMail works. All of  
this stuff inhales vigorously.

Looking back at my eMail server logs, I see that this particular bug  
has been hard at work since the 17th.

expletive deleted

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 21, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 I wonder when it is going to get bad enough that the powers decide
 that it is time to fundamentally redesign how eMail works. All of
 this stuff inhales vigorously.

About the same time that those same powers decide that it is up to  
the OS to make itself secure, rather than relying on anti-virus, anti- 
spyware programs that are by their very nature reactive.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
 On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
 
 If you look up the 'from' chain, you'll eventually see the starting
 point of the email (the 'envelope', so to speak.) Are they all the  
 same
 (probably likely) or different?
 
 Al I see on the server is the apparent from and IP. The messages  
 are getting bounced, so can one look up the chain? How? (Or does it  
 vary from mail server to mail server?)

I might be misunderstanding what you're seeing... but I was referring to 
looking at the headers of an email message.

In thunderbird, by selecting the Headers - All' option under View, you 
can see everything in the envelope:

X-Account-Key: account4
X-UIDL: 2048239458739
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 000
Received: from [70.86.98.242] by ...
Received: from marge.leafe.com...
Received: from leafe.com

etc.

Whil


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 21, 2007, at 6:08 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:

 I might be misunderstanding what you're seeing... but I was  
 referring to
 looking at the headers of an email message.

 In thunderbird...

OK, Whil, thanks. I'll try to be clearer. Thunderbird is the client.  
Mine is Mac:Mail. Since all of these spambot messages are to an  
invalid user name, they are being bounced by my email server  
software, so they are never making it to any client. I don't know how  
to see anything more about bounced messages than what shows up in the  
eMail log.

I have half-heartedly been looking up how to create a catch-all email  
account on my server software, so I can capture some of these mails  
and look up the chain. I had one at one point, but since it was  
full o' nothing but spam, I deleted that account.

And, really, these things aren't doing much harm. It's just bloating  
my email logs, and chewing up some server cycles. Nevertheless, I'd  
like to figure out how to stop it.

Ken


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 21, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

 Since all of these spambot messages are to an
 invalid user name, they are being bounced by my email server
 software, so they are never making it to any client. I don't know how
 to see anything more about bounced messages than what shows up in the
 eMail log.

All you can get from a bounced message is the IP address of the  
server that is trying to send it to you. That could be the  
originator, or it could be an intermediate that is relaying the mail.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: [NF] eMail flood on my server

2007-01-21 Thread Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh

On Jan 21, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:

   All you can get from a bounced message is the IP address of the
 server that is trying to send it to you. That could be the
 originator, or it could be an intermediate that is relaying the mail.

Thank you. The IP addresses are all different, so I guess I'll try to  
let a few through and see if I can find the IP of the machine that is  
really sending all of it.

Ken




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.