Re: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-13 Thread Sytze de Boer
Michael
I've asked this before but I suspect it may have been rejected because
my message may have been in Rich format.

The 2 questions are
1  If my icon has a tick in the Run in separate memory space, and is
greyed out, is it running in separate memory space.
2  Where can you change the system so it isn't greyed out
   (I've googled this question without success)

Sytze





On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've had weird errors that went away when I checked the run in separate 
 memory space on the shortcut.

 Just for giggles, give it a try.



 --- On Sat, 11/1/08, Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: VFP9-strange behaviour
 To: profox@leafe.com
 Date: Saturday, November 1, 2008, 5:58 PM
 In my app, I have a re-index routine.
 Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files
 (All free standing tables)

 The routine goes

 blah blah
 use (thefile) excl
 delete tag all of (thefile)
 pack

 This has worked without problems for 10 years and I cannot
 identify why it
 bombs out with this client.
 The message is File already exists., error no 7

 The system bombs out
 When I re-enter, the message is error 5.
 With error 5, my system automatically performs a re-index
 and all is well
 (again)
 i.e. error 7 is not encountered till you explicitly perform
 the re-index
 routine

 This user has 23 people on Terminal Server

 I can't figure the problem
 Diskspace is ok

 Any help is appreciated

 --
 Regards
 Sytze de Boer
 Kiss Systems
 Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
 Skype: kissman2
 www.kiss.co.nz


 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 multipart/alternative
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   text/html
 ---

 ___
 Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
 Subscription Maintenance:
 http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
 OT-free version of this list:
 http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
 Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
 This message:
 http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
 the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
 medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
 those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-03 Thread Tracy Pearson
We found an Anti-Virus program kept the dbf open long enough for the PACK to
fail. We would usually find the packed data in a temp file sitting in the
folder where the DBF should be.

For some clients, it might have been a combination of spyware and anti-virus
applications conflicting with the open state of the DBF.

HTH,

Tracy

-Original Message-
From: Sytze de Boer
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 5:58 PM

In my app, I have a re-index routine.
Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files (All free standing
tables)

The routine goes

blah blah
use (thefile) excl
delete tag all of (thefile)
pack

This has worked without problems for 10 years and I cannot identify why it
bombs out with this client.
The message is File already exists., error no 7

The system bombs out
When I re-enter, the message is error 5.
With error 5, my system automatically performs a re-index and all is well
(again)
i.e. error 7 is not encountered till you explicitly perform the re-index
routine

This user has 23 people on Terminal Server

I can't figure the problem
Diskspace is ok

Any help is appreciated

--
Regards
Sytze de Boer
Kiss Systems
Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
Skype: kissman2
www.kiss.co.nz




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-03 Thread Sytze de Boer
Tracy, thanks for your input

I'm still struggling with this problem.
This has happened to me once before, about 2 years ago, same client, same
circumstances
Then it went away but I never knew what started it or what I did to make it
go away

I've now copied all the datafiles to a different folder. (dbf, fpt,cdx)
Same hard drive, still Terninal Server, same exe
No problems

This weekend I plan to copy all these files into 2nd folder, then delete
them in folder 1
Then copy back again, then I'll re-try the routine.
When the system crashes, it is always the same table.
The largest table is half a gig. The problem table is relatively small.
Sheesh



SdB




On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Tracy Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We found an Anti-Virus program kept the dbf open long enough for the PACK
 to
 fail. We would usually find the packed data in a temp file sitting in the
 folder where the DBF should be.

 For some clients, it might have been a combination of spyware and
 anti-virus
 applications conflicting with the open state of the DBF.

 HTH,

 Tracy

 -Original Message-
 From: Sytze de Boer
 Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 5:58 PM

 In my app, I have a re-index routine.
 Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files (All free standing
 tables)

 The routine goes

 blah blah
 use (thefile) excl
 delete tag all of (thefile)
 pack

 This has worked without problems for 10 years and I cannot identify why it
 bombs out with this client.
 The message is File already exists., error no 7

 The system bombs out
 When I re-enter, the message is error 5.
 With error 5, my system automatically performs a re-index and all is well
 (again)
 i.e. error 7 is not encountered till you explicitly perform the re-index
 routine

 This user has 23 people on Terminal Server

 I can't figure the problem
 Diskspace is ok

 Any help is appreciated

 --
 Regards
 Sytze de Boer
 Kiss Systems
 Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
 Skype: kissman2
 www.kiss.co.nz




[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-03 Thread Tracy Pearson
I feel something still has an Open state on your problem file. Has someone
figured out they can access the data via Excel? 

Since we do not have control over our clients environments, I have changed
from using the VFP PACK command. I now use something similar to:

   OPEN EXCLUSIVE   
   SELECT * INTO CURSOR ... WHERE NOT DELETED() NOFILTER   
   ZAP   
   APPEND FROM DBF()   
   USE   

I haven't heard of the problem lately, unless someone is using an older
release of our product.

Tracy


-Original Message-
From: Sytze de Boer
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 2:28 PM

Tracy, thanks for your input

I'm still struggling with this problem.
This has happened to me once before, about 2 years ago, same client, same
circumstances Then it went away but I never knew what started it or what I
did to make it go away

I've now copied all the datafiles to a different folder. (dbf, fpt,cdx) Same
hard drive, still Terninal Server, same exe No problems

This weekend I plan to copy all these files into 2nd folder, then delete
them in folder 1 Then copy back again, then I'll re-try the routine.
When the system crashes, it is always the same table.
The largest table is half a gig. The problem table is relatively small.
Sheesh



SdB




___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-03 Thread Sytze de Boer
Hi Michael
I hav eseen reference to this before (run in separate memory space) and I
have asked for clarification.
i.e. on my laptop, this is greyed out. (with a tick)
I don't know where to turn this off or on, and since it is ticked and greyed
out, if in fact it is working.

Can you throw some light on this grey matter ?




On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 I've had weird errors that went away when I checked the run in separate
 memory space on the shortcut.

 Just for giggles, give it a try.



 --- On Sat, 11/1/08, Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: VFP9-strange behaviour
  To: profox@leafe.com
  Date: Saturday, November 1, 2008, 5:58 PM
  In my app, I have a re-index routine.
  Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files
  (All free standing tables)
 
  The routine goes
 
  blah blah
  use (thefile) excl
  delete tag all of (thefile)
  pack
 
  This has worked without problems for 10 years and I cannot
  identify why it
  bombs out with this client.
  The message is File already exists., error no 7
 
  The system bombs out
  When I re-enter, the message is error 5.
  With error 5, my system automatically performs a re-index
  and all is well
  (again)
  i.e. error 7 is not encountered till you explicitly perform
  the re-index
  routine
 
  This user has 23 people on Terminal Server
 
  I can't figure the problem
  Diskspace is ok
 
  Any help is appreciated
 
  --
  Regards
  Sytze de Boer
  Kiss Systems
  Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
  Skype: kissman2
  www.kiss.co.nz
 
 
  --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
  multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
  ---
 
  ___
  Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
  Subscription Maintenance:
  http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
  OT-free version of this list:
  http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
  Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
  This message:
 
 http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
  the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
  medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
  those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[excessive quoting removed by server]

___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-02 Thread Alan Bourke
Make sure all the TS users are creating temporary files in seperate
locations. 
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


RE: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-01 Thread Allen
Could this be another disk write ahead cache blunder
Al 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sytze de Boer
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 10:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VFP9-strange behaviour

In my app, I have a re-index routine.
Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files
(All free standing tables)

The routine goes

blah blah
use (thefile) excl
delete tag all of (thefile)
pack



___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


Re: VFP9-strange behaviour

2008-11-01 Thread Michael Madigan
I've had weird errors that went away when I checked the run in separate memory 
space on the shortcut.

Just for giggles, give it a try.



--- On Sat, 11/1/08, Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Sytze de Boer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: VFP9-strange behaviour
 To: profox@leafe.com
 Date: Saturday, November 1, 2008, 5:58 PM
 In my app, I have a re-index routine.
 Before it re-creates the indexex, it packs the files
 (All free standing tables)
 
 The routine goes
 
 blah blah
 use (thefile) excl
 delete tag all of (thefile)
 pack
 
 This has worked without problems for 10 years and I cannot
 identify why it
 bombs out with this client.
 The message is File already exists., error no 7
 
 The system bombs out
 When I re-enter, the message is error 5.
 With error 5, my system automatically performs a re-index
 and all is well
 (again)
 i.e. error 7 is not encountered till you explicitly perform
 the re-index
 routine
 
 This user has 23 people on Terminal Server
 
 I can't figure the problem
 Diskspace is ok
 
 Any help is appreciated
 
 -- 
 Regards
 Sytze de Boer
 Kiss Systems
 Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:021 937611,
 Skype: kissman2
 www.kiss.co.nz
 
 
 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
 multipart/alternative
   text/plain (text body -- kept)
   text/html
 ---
 
 ___
 Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
 Subscription Maintenance:
 http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
 OT-free version of this list:
 http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
 Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
 This message:
 http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
 the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
 medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
 those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.