Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:23 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Kaye wrote: Maybe we should post the voluntary rules of Profox order on the Fox wiki. Assuming Mr. Black will let us... g,dr As long as you're initials don't being with J and end with P, you're probably able to do so. How about MF ? A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 19, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Is it April 1 already? Okay, who are you and what did you do with the real Ed Leafe g? Take the number of complaints posted to the list about abuse of OT, and multiply that by 10 to get an idea of the private complaints that I receive. A twit filter worked for me. I no longer have to play OT-Nazi. And I'm not missing much! Agreed. But for a new member to the list to constantly have to learn this the hard way, a list-wide delay for those who have demonstrated no desire to abide by community standards will allow everything to flow to ProFox, and help keep ProFoxTech much cleaner. - I guess if you posted the truth about the list on the sign up page you would have little new person volume. Bad Steve. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Mar 20, 2008, at 8:28 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: I guess if you posted the truth about the list on the sign up page you would have little new person volume. Oh? And what exactly is the truth? -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:08 AM Ed Leafe wrote: Oh? And what exactly is the truth? That we are a bunch of ruckus guys who love to abuse this e-mail list and scare off the newbies with our flagrant disregard to the rules... David L. Crooks ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:14 AM, David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:08 AM Ed Leafe wrote: Oh? And what exactly is the truth? That we are a bunch of ruckus guys who love to abuse this e-mail list and scare off the newbies with our flagrant disregard to the rules... That most of us are to lazy to remember to change the subject line when we deviate away from the thread into the standard BS that the Tech List doesn't want to see. Now that Paul showed my how in GMail I try. I also have to laugh when Babcock apples his beer fines and doesn't do the subject change at the same time. Anywho I try to find interesting content with a science background. Those threads usually get hijacked one way or another. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Mar 19, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Ted Roche wrote: Is it April 1 already? Okay, who are you and what did you do with the real Ed Leafe g? Take the number of complaints posted to the list about abuse of OT, and multiply that by 10 to get an idea of the private complaints that I receive. A twit filter worked for me. I no longer have to play OT-Nazi. And I'm not missing much! Agreed. But for a new member to the list to constantly have to learn this the hard way, a list-wide delay for those who have demonstrated no desire to abide by community standards will allow everything to flow to ProFox, and help keep ProFoxTech much cleaner. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, who are you and what did you do with the real Ed Leafe g? Must be the job change . A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
Ted Roche wrote: A twit filter worked for me. I no longer have to play OT-Nazi. And I'm not missing much! Since I read this that must mean my twit filter isn't working... Sorry, couldn't resist!!! g -- Matthew S. Jarvis IT Manager, MCP Bike Friday - Performance That Packs! www.bikefriday.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
Maybe we should post the voluntary rules of Profox order on the Fox wiki. Assuming Mr. Black will let us... g,dr Ed Leafe wrote: Agreed. But for a new member to the list to constantly have to learn this the hard way, a list-wide delay for those who have demonstrated no desire to abide by community standards will allow everything to flow to ProFox, and help keep ProFoxTech much cleaner. -- Richard Kaye Vice President Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest response time, please send your support queries to: Technical Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Support - [EMAIL PROTECTED] All Other Requests - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message has been checked for viruses before sending. - ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, who are you and what did you do with the real Ed Leafe g? LOL! A twit filter worked for me. I no longer have to play OT-Nazi. And I'm not missing much! Sometimes OT is funny (no stereotypes there at all!) but can I suggest a new filter: [OT-ELECTION] For the boring US election posts! -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
OR [OT - Boring Brits] LOL --- Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, who are you and what did you do with the real Ed Leafe g? LOL! A twit filter worked for me. I no longer have to play OT-Nazi. And I'm not missing much! Sometimes OT is funny (no stereotypes there at all!) but can I suggest a new filter: [OT-ELECTION] For the boring US election posts! -- Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Matt Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I read this that must mean my twit filter isn't working... Sorry, couldn't resist!!! g I'm sorry, did someone say something s? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN]: newbie question re: ProFox-Tech off-topic threads
Richard Kaye wrote: Maybe we should post the voluntary rules of Profox order on the Fox wiki. Assuming Mr. Black will let us... g,dr As long as you're initials don't being with J and end with P, you're probably able to do so. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
