[protest-ro] Gandul - Finul presedintelui Basescu reintroduce la Arad cenzura in teatru

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie ARIN
http://www.gandul.info/articol_15889/finul_presedintelui_basescu_reintroduce_la_arad_cenzura___in_teatru.html

Un spectacol semnat de regizorul Mihai Maniutiu e criticat de catre decidentii 
locali aradeni, cu binecuvantarea primarului orasului, doar pe baza de zvonuri


 Regizorul Mihai Maniutiu - pus la zid pentru "Iubirea Fedrei" 

Un spectacol de teatru a trezit din adormire un oras intreg, provocand 
dezbateri aprinse in consiliul local. Este vorba despre "Iubirea Fedrei" (1996) 
semnata de Sarah Kane, adaptare dupa Fedra lui Seneca, montata in premiera la 
Teatrul de Stat din Arad de catre regizorul Mihai Maniutiu, unul dintre 
creatorii cu cel mai important box-office din Romania. Din pacate, toata faima 
autorului dramatic - texte de Sarah Kane au fost montate cu succes in lumea 
intreaga - si a regizorului nu sunt suficiente pentru a constitui o garantie de 
incredere. Desi spectacolul este inca in repetitii, directorul teatrului, 
Laurian Oniga, a fost convocat marti dimineata la primarie, unde a fost supus 
unei judecati sumare de catre seful comisiei de cultura, Cristian Moisescu, in 
prezenta primarului Gheorghe Falca si a viceprimarilor orasului Arad pe baza 
unei reclamatii care incrimina "nuditatea pe scena". 

Cum nici unul dintre cei prezenti nu vazusera spectacolul, i-am intrebat 
telefonic ce au de reprosat in acest moment directorului teatrului, care a 
castigat recent concursul pentru acest post. Cristian Moisescu, fost primar al 
Aradului imediat dupa 1990, a tinut sa precizeze pe toata durata convorbirii ca 
nu este "o persoana incuiata". Restul declaratiilor nu confirmau aceasta: "Am 
citit despre autoare, stiu in general despre ce e vorba, scrie texte pline de 
vulgaritati si obscenitati. La noi aici au fost si reactii in teatru. Nu sunt 
de acord sa popularizam raul, fiindca si asa traim intr-o lume plina de rau. Am 
avut o discutie cu directorul teatrului si i-am cerut sa aduca textul maine 
(miercuri, 27 septembrie) sa citim in consiliu anumite pasaje. Ca presedinte al 
comisiei de Cultura trebuie sa iau o pozitie. O sa anunt si consiliul local 
pentru ca pe viitor sa nu se mai intample asa ceva. (sic!)" La randul sau, 
primarul Gheorghe Falca (celebru mai ales pentru ca este finul presedintelui 
Basescu) crede ca repertoriul teatrului poate fi dictat de la primarie: 
"Conform legislatiei, exista un consiliu administrativ care aproba activitatea 
teatrului. Mi se pare normal ca primaria sa ia in discutie ce repertoriu se 
face. Comisia de cultura militeaza pentru bugetul teatrului, deci e normal sa 
se intereseze ce se intampla acolo."

De partea cealalta, directorul teatrului spune ca nu-si imagina ca se mai poate 
intampla asa ceva in anul 2006: "Consiliul de administratie se ocupa de 
problemele administrative, nu de repertoriu, care este responsabilitatea mea. 
Am invitat un regizor important, recunoscut, multipremiat, tocmai in speranta 
ca asta va duce la o retrezire a teatrului acestuia. Din pacate, chiar daca 
este un oras de granita, paradoxal, exista la Arad o mare inertie locala, cel 
putin in materie de teatru. Mi s-a spus la intalnirea repectiva ca s-a auzit ca 
textul este vulgar, licentios si obscen, iar spectacolul la fel, si mi s-a 
cerut sa prezint textul in consiliu, ca sa se taie din el. Mi s-a cerut sa iau 
masuri, clamandu-se ca aradenii nu platesc pentru asa ceva. Nu voi merge sa 
citesc din textul spectacolului in consiliu, abia asa s-ar vulgariza totul. 
Cred ca ar trebui ca acesti domni sa vada intai spectacolul, si abia apoi sa 
discute." 

La randul sau, regizorul Mihai Maniutiu, in acest moment unul dintre cei mai 
importanti creatori romani de teatru, spune: " N-am crezut ca voi ajunge sa 
spun asa ceva, dar cenzura este o reinventie aradeana in 2006, cu numai cateva 
luni inainte de intrarea in Eropa. Daca lucrurile astea s-ar petrece la un 
nivel de reala vizibilitate, un asemenea caz ar putea depuncta Romania. De la 
Dulea, care mi-a interzis in 1986 spectacolul «Tulburarea apelor», nu mi s-a 
mai intamplat asa ceva. Au trecut 20 de ani de atunci. Mi se pare o gluma 
proasta." Intrebat cum ar caracteriza spectacolul care a starnit toata aceasta 
tevatura fara a fi vazut inca de cineva, regizorul spune: "E vorba despre 
dezastrele amorului si manipulare politica, iar cand asemenea teme se ciocnesc, 
e normal ca spectacolul sa aiba o forta si o violenta poetica - subliniez acest 
cuvant. E un spectacol care isi propune sa provoace in spectator o meditatie 
interioara, dupa ce intalnirea cu scena se produce. Asta, evident, daca i se va 
permite." 

"Iubirea Fedrei" a avut premiera la Gate Theatre, in Londra, in mai 1996. La 
noi, Sarah Kane a mai fost montata la Teatrul Act (Psychosis 4.48, cu Maia 
Morgenstern, in regia lui Tudor Tepeneag) si recent la Teatrul National din 
Cluj, cu Purificare, in regia lui Andrei Serban. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

--  
"Let me know, that at least, she will try
Then she'll be a true love of mine"
www.arin.ro

[Non-text

[protest-ro] Popular resistance from Caracas to Cairo

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie Radu Iliescu
Popular resistance from Caracas to Cairo

The struggle for justice and prosperity in the Arab world and everywhere 
depends upon popular resistance to US imperialism and its local clients.
  By George Galloway 
  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14996.htm 

09/17/06 "Al-Ahram" -- -- "Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!" reads the 
eponymous statue's inscription in Percy Bysshe Shelley's poem Ozymandias. But 
it is the boastful tyrant's monument, not the self-confidence of his enemies, 
that lies splintered in the sands. 

Five years on from the atrocities of 11 September 2001, George W Bush and the 
neo- conservatives have managed to turn much of Afghanistan and Iraq into 
desolation, full of now lifeless things. 

Amid this carnage lies another, unlamented casualty -- the colossal wreck of US 
and British foreign policy. The authors of that wreckage cannot conceivably 
claim they were not warned of the calamities they would unleash. 

Millions of us told them what would happen if they seized on the events of five 
years ago to launch what the Pentagon now calls the "long war". Four days after 
the attacks in New York and Washington I spoke in a sitting of the recalled 
British parliament. I warned that if the US and its allies mishandled the 
response, they would create a thousand, ten thousand Bin Ladens. Five years on, 
is that not what's hapened? 

Many tens of thousands of people -- mostly women and children -- have been 
killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Do the ultimate perpetrators of the killings, 
as they sit behind their mahogany desks in the White House and Downing Street, 
imagine that the rest of us have not noticed how they do not deem those Arab 
and Muslim dead worthy of the same grief as attends their own? 

Do they think we have not noticed how they refuse even to count the number 
killed in Iraq? Did they believe that the pornographic images of Abu Ghraib 
would be discounted? Did George Bush and Tony Blair delude themselves into 
thinking they could whet the knife that Israel plunged into Lebanon without 
being seen as accomplices to war crimes? 

Blair certainly gave every appearance of having lost all contact with reality 
when he flew to Tel Aviv last weekend. With his own MPs plotting to oust him 
for damaging their re-election prospects, he went to occupied Jerusalem and 
threw his arms around Ehud Olmert, whose war in Lebanon the vast majority of 
people in Britain opposed.

As for Bush, he has always struggled even to give the impression of having a 
connection with reality. Nevertheless, the reality of the last five years 
stubbornly remains. The world is not a safer place; it is more violent, more 
dangerous. 

There are more, not fewer, jihadists of the Bin Laden stripe. The bitterness in 
the Arab and Muslim world is deeper, broader and more incendiary. 

In Afghanistan, Blair, oblivious to his nation's history of military 
catastrophe in that proud country, has hurled his soldiers into the most 
unforgiving terrain, against a ferocious and growing military resistance, in a 
part of the world that even Alexander the Great could not occupy. 

In Iraq, the occupiers have spilt enough blood to turn the two great rivers 
red. In order to cling on they foment sectarian and confessional strife which, 
and this may be their parting gift, threatens tragically to trisect the 
country. Can they with a straight face claim Iraq is better off now than it was 
before the invasion?

Remember what they said their war would achieve: freedom and democracy, respect 
for women, prosperity and dignity. 

In truth, it was the freedom of US corporate culture, the democracy of the 
dollar and an Arab world ruled by corrupt kings and puppet presidents just as 
pliant but a little less gauche, able to rig an election as the Bush's do in 
Florida rather than tactlessly incarcerating the opposition.

Even these, their own selfish ambitions, have not been achieved. That 
increasingly stands out as the most salient feature of the reality they have 
created over the last half- decade. Nowhere symbolises it more than Lebanon. 

In March of last year the US State Department and British Foreign Office were 
incongruously playing the role of revolutionary pamphleteer. The "Cedar 
Revolution" in Lebanon was, we were assured, about to usher an irresistible 
movement for a "New Middle East". 

Fifteen months later and we know what that looks like: the Israeli army 
pledging to bomb Lebanon back two decades and embarking on an invasion whose 
success was predicated on reigniting the flames of civil war which the people 
of Lebanon have done so much to douse. 

The war this summer was not merely another episode in the bloody history of 
Israel lashing out at bordering states. It was a battle in Washington's wider 
war on terror. It was a front that opened up, ironically, precisely because the 
US is mired and losing on the Iraq front. The assault on Lebanon was meant to 
pave the way to further a

[protest-ro] JN - Interes - Cazul Bordei: Ministrul Iorgulescu minte!

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie ARIN
http://www.jurnalul.ro/articol_62676/interes___cazul_bordei__ministrul_iorgulescu_minte_.html

Ministrul Culturii, Adrian Iorgulescu, n-a suspendat, asa cum a promis, avizul 
dat de Comisia Nationala a Monumentelor Istorice, care-i permitea lui Costel 
Constanda sa distruga Parcul Bordei. Drept urmare, Andrei Chiliman, primarul 
Sectorului 1, va cere in instanta anularea avizului dat de minister. 

Incredibil, dar adevarat. Ministrul Culturii a mintit atunci cand a declarat ca 
a anulat avizul dat de Comisia Nationala a Monumentelor Istorice omului de 
afaceri, Costel Constanda, fapt ce-i permitea acestuia sa faca din Bordei un 
cartier rezidential. 

La 22 septembrie s-a consumat inca un termen al procesului dintre consilierii 
generali al Capitalei si Constanda, cel care detine 3,3 hectare din Parcul 
Bordei. Printre actele depuse la dosar de omul de afaceri s-a numarat si o 
adresa din partea secretarului de stat, Virgil Stefan Nitulescu, care-l asigura 
pe acesta ca "Ministerul Culturii si Cultelor nu a emis un alt act 
administrativ care sa suspende sau sa infirme avizul dat de Comisia Nationala a 
Momumentelor Istorice". Cu alte cuvinte, declaratiile pompoase date de 
Iorgulescu pe 19 iulie cu privire la suspendarea actului cu pricina au fost 
facute doar de dragul camerelor de filmat. 

PE DINAFARA. Pe de alta parte, ministrul Culturii recunoaste ca nu stie care 
este realitatea din teren. "Nu stiu despre nici o adresa pe care ministerul 
i-ar fi dat-o lui Constanda. Nici nu stiu cine a semnat-o, o sa ma interesez. 
Pot sa va spun ca la sfarsitul lunii septembrie se va rediscuta cazul, lucrarea 
fiind data comisiei spre reavizare. Comisia a fost schimbata, iar avizul poate 
fi considerat suspendat atat timp cat nu produce efecte", ne-a declarat 
Iorgulescu. Ba produce efecte, in conditiile in care Constanda se prezinta la 
proces cu un act ce demonstreaza ca avizul care-i permite sa distruga Parcul 
Bordei nu a fost anulat. 

De asemenea, Ministerul Culturii nu a elaborat nici un raspuns la contestatia 
formulata de Primaria Sectorului 1, cu privire la acelasi lucru. Drept urmare, 
primarul Andrei Chiliman va actiona in judecata Ministerul Culturii, cerandu-i 
sa anuleze avizul dat ilegal. "Membrii Comisiei Nationale a Monumentelor si-au 
depasit atributiile, aproband atat studiul istoric de fundamentare, cat si 
Planul Urbanistic Zonal facut de Constanda. Pentru ca nu a fost anulat avizul 
pana acum, ma voi adresa instantei", ne-a spus Chiliman. 

"SUB PROTECTIE". Initial, avizul a fost semnat la inceputul lunii iulie de 
secretarul de stat PD, Ioan Onisei. Actul se referea la restrangerea zonelor de 
protectie. Mai exact, Parcul Bordei se afla intre doua monumente istorice, 
Parcul Herastrau si Uzinele Comunale Bucuresti, pe zona de protectie a 
acestora. Constada, prin studiul sau, a propus Comisiei Nationale a 
Monumentelor Istorice, iar aceasta a aprobat, diminuarea spatiului de 
protectie, astfel incat sa poata construi dupa bunul plac. Acest lucru sfideaza 
orice reguli, avand in vedere faptul ca nu Constanda era cel in masura sa-si 
faca propiul studiu, ci specialisti neimplicati in proiectul omului de afaceri. 
Omul de afaceri vrea sa construiasca pe spatiul verde un asamblu de vile de lux 
si un hotel. Conform avizului, inca nesuspendat de Iorgulescu, Constanda poate 
sa construiasca imobile cat Casa Presei. 

Pentru a salva ce se mai poate, Ordinul Arhitectilor din Romania a cerut 
Directiei pentru Cultura, Culte si Patrimoniu clasarea de urgenta ca monument 
istoric a Parcului Bordei. Sub numele de Parcul Harastrau Vechi, asa cum apare 
in planul Bucurestiului din 1923, Bordei a constituit nucleul de la care au 
pornit lucrarile de amenajare a celui mai mare parc al Capitalei, Parcul 
National, ulterior Parcul Herastrau. 

Monica C. ANDREI

--  
"Let me know, that at least, she will try
Then she'll be a true love of mine"
www.arin.ro

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[protest-ro] Adevarul - Sulfina Barbu, audiata la DNA

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie ARIN
http://www.adevarulonline.ro/2006-09-27/Actualitate/sulfina-barbu-audiata-la-dna_199761.html

Ministrul mediului, Sulfina Barbu, s-a prezentat, ieri, la DNA, pentru a da 
informatii în cazul Luminitei Constantinescu, directoarea unei firme arestata 
dupa ce a fost prinsa în flagrant delict, în timp ce primea 25.000 de euro. 
Ministrul a facut apel catre toate persoanele care detin date si informatii 
relevante pentru derularea cercetarilor sa le furnizeze procurorilor. 
Procurorii spun ca Luminita Constantinescu a primit de la strain 25.000 de 
euro, pretinzând ca are influenta asupra ministrului mediului si asupra 
comisarului general al Garzii Nationale de Mediu, pentru a-i înlesni 
cetateanului strain obtinerea acordului de mediu si a altor autorizatii 
necesare punerii în functiune a unui incinerator de deseuri.

--  
"Let me know, that at least, she will try
Then she'll be a true love of mine"
www.arin.ro

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[protest-ro] Din nou parcul Bordei, pe site la MCC

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie ARIN

Daca intelege cineva ceva din asta, poate explica - eu nu mai inteleg nimic!
?

Codruta



Scrisoare adresata de Adrian IORGULESCU, Ministrul Culturii si Cultelor, 
domnului Adriean VIDEANU, Primarul General al Capitalei, si domnului Andrei 
Ioan CHILIMAN, Primarul sectorului 1 Bucuresti

http://www.cultura.ro/News.aspx?ID=881

Biroul de presa al Ministerului Culturii  si Cultelor va aduce la cunostinta ca 
domnul Adrian Iorgulescu, ministrul culturii si cultelor, i-a trimis azi, 26 
septembrie 2006, domnului Adriean Videanu, Primar General al Capitaleri, si 
domnului Andrei Ioan Chiliman, Primarul Sectorului 1 Bucuresti, urmatoarea 
scrisoare: 



CABINET MINISTRU 

Domnului Primar General Adriean VIDEANU,

În atentia: Domnului Andrei CHILIMAN, 
Primarul Sectorului 1



Domnule Primar General Adriean VIDEANU,

În legatura cu avizul Ministerului Culturii si Cultelor nr. 164 - 
M/04.07.2006 privind Studiul istoric de fundamentare, delimitare a zonei de 
protectie a monumentelor istorice si regulamentul acesteia, aferente Planului 
Urbanistic Zonal Bd. Mircea Eliade- str. Turgheniev, sect. 1, Bucuresti, va 
informam:

  1.. Ca urmare a primirii contestatiei mentionate, am constatat ca Avizul a 
fost emis cu depasirea competentelor materiale ale Comisiei Nationale a 
Monumentelor Istorice si am solicitat acesteia solutionarea contestatiei. 
  2.. Legea 422/2001 privind protejarea monumentelor istorice a fost 
modificata, cel mai recent, prin Legea nr. 259/2006, astfel încât Ministerul 
Culturii si Cultelor a elaborat un nou Regulament de organizare si functionare 
a Comisiei Nationale a Monumentelor Istorice. Întrucât contestatia formulata de 
Primaria Sectorului 1, în legatura cu Avizul mentionat nu a putut fi, pâna la 
aceasta data, solutionata tocmai din cauza modificarilor legislatiei în 
domeniul monumentelor istorice si a declansarii procedurii de numire a unei noi 
Comisii Nationale a Monumentelor Istorice, în prima sedinta a noii Comisii 
Nationale a Monumentelor Istorice se va discuta contestatia depusa. 
  3.. De îndata ce Comisia Nationala a Monumentelor Istorice va decide cu 
privire la obiectul contestatiei, va vom înainta punctul de vedere al acestui 
organism. 
  4.. Având în vedere cele de mai sus, apreciem ca, pâna la solutionarea 
definitiva a contestatiei, este necesar ca procedura de elaborare a altor 
documentatii urbanistice în legatura cu obiectul Avizului sa ramâna în 
asteptare, situatie pe care va rugam a o lua în considerare. 

Adrian IORGULESCU
Ministrul Culturii si Cultelor


--  
"Let me know, that at least, she will try
Then she'll be a true love of mine"
www.arin.ro

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[protest-ro] Secrets of the digital detectives

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie ARIN
http://www.economist.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=7904281&CFID=94420119&CFTOKEN=2d8d605-6da28685-d61d-454d-8214-602a644bce5b

Computing: How fraud-detection systems combine dozens of clues to spot 
suspicious patterns in mountains of transactions

THE pleasure of reading a classic detective story comes from the way that the 
sleuth puts together several clues to arrive at a surprising conclusion. What 
is enjoyable is not so much finding out who the villain is, but hearing the 
detectives explain their reasoning. Today, not all detectives are human. At 
insurance companies, banks and telecoms firms, fraud-detection software is used 
to comb through millions of transactions, looking for patterns and spotting 
fraudulent activity far more quickly and accurately than any human could. But 
like human detectives, these software sleuths follow logical rules and combine 
disparate pieces of data-and there is something curiously fascinating about the 
way they work.

Consider car insurance. Every Monday morning, telephone operators at insurance 
firms listen to stories of the weekend's motoring mishaps, typing the answers 
to several dozen standard questions into their computers. Once, each claim form 
then passed to a loss adjuster for approval; now software is increasingly used 
instead. The Monday-morning insurance claims, it turns out, are slightly more 
likely to be fraudulent than Tuesday claims, since weekends make it easier for 
policyholders who stage accidents to assemble friends as false witnesses. A 
single rule like that is straightforward enough for a human loss adjuster to 
take into account. But fraud-detection software can consider dozens of other 
variables, too.

If a claimant was nearly injured (because of an impact near the driver's seat, 
for example), the accident is less likely to have been staged and the claim 
less likely to be fraudulent, even if it is being filed on a Monday. Drivers of 
cars with low resale values are proportionately more likely to file fraudulent 
claims. But that factor is less important if the claimant also owns a luxury 
car, which suggests affluence. And if the insurance on the luxury car has 
expired, the likelihood of foul play drops further, since this increases the 
likelihood a person will drive a cheaper but properly insured car. And so on.

The staggering number of combinations, each an indication of fraud or 
legitimacy, underscores the limitations of human analysis. Fraud-detection 
software, however, can evaluate a vast number of permutations and deliver a 
fraud-probability score. And such programs are getting better as new claims 
provide extra statistics that can help tune the computational recipes, or 
algorithms, used to detect fraud.

German insurers, for example, recently noticed that claimants who call back 
shortly after filing, angrily demanding speedy settlement, are 
disproportionately more likely to be cheaters, says Jörg Schiller, an insurance 
expert at the Otto Beisheim School of Management in Vallendar, Germany. 
Evidently fraudsters consider themselves good actors. But when pugnacious 
policyholders call after the 20th of the month, the probability that they are 
acting decreases slightly, since funds from the previous month's paycheque may 
be dwindling. Mr Schiller says most car insurers in rich countries now use 
fraud-detection software, and those in developing countries are adopting it 
rapidly.



Play your cards right
With an estimated $250m in annual sales, and yearly growth topping 25%, the 
largest and fastest-growing category of fraud-detection software is that used 
to spot fraudulent credit-card transactions. According to the Association for 
Payment Clearing Services, based in London, such software is largely 
responsible for reducing losses from credit-card fraud in Britain alone from 
£505m ($925m) in 2004 to £439m ($799m) in 2005. Merchants implementing 
anti-fraud software for the first time commonly see losses from fraud reduced 
by half. Such software evaluates many parameters associated with each 
credit-card transaction, including specific details of the items being 
purchased (derived from their bar codes), to evaluate the likelihood of foul 
play in the form of a numerical risk score. Any transactions that score above a 
certain pre-defined threshold are then denied or challenged.

Buying petrol seems innocent enough. If no attendant is present, however, the 
risk score goes up, because fraudsters prefer to avoid face-to-face purchases. 
Buying a diamond ring soon after buying petrol results in an even higher risk 
score: thieves often test a card's validity with a small purchase before buying 
something much bigger. A $100 purchase at a shop that sells hard liquor is more 
likely to be fraudulent than a more expensive shopping spree at a wine shop, 
because whisky is easier to fence. A purchase of sports shoes is risky because 
trainers appeal to a demographic with less money than, say, buyers of golf 
clubs

[protest-ro] Jonathan Scheele va da explicatii si pentru Afacerea YPS

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie b.draghici
http://www.gazetadebucuresti.ro/fullnews.php?ID=1609

Dezvãluiri ºocante despre afacerile cu fonduri comunitare europene (1)

Jonathan Scheele va da explicaþii ºi pentru Afacerea YPS
"GAZETA DE BUCUREªTI" continuã sã facã luminã în tenebrele marilor 
afaceri cu fonduri europene, aºa cum a promis încã de la primul sãu 
numãr apãrut la începutul lunii decembrie 2005. Articolul publicat 
atunci se intitula "YPS – schema româneascã de irosire a fondurilor 
europene" ºi încerca sã determine autoritãþile române ºi oficialii 
europeni sã stopeze irosirea multor milioane de euro alocate din 
bugetul guvernamental ºi din fondurile Uniunii Europene.
Programele monitorizate de "Gazeta de Bucureºti" produc pe bandã 
rulantã "manageri publici", funcþionari publici cu statut special 
antrenaþi în cadrul a douã programe pentru a moderniza administraþia 
publicã româneascã. Bursa specialã "Guvernul României" ºi Programul 
YPS au consumat deja circa 12 milioane de euro.


Articolul integral este postat la 
http://www.gazetadebucuresti.ro/fullnews.php?ID=1609

Bogdan Draghici
www.draghici.ro







Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[protest-ro] Comunicat de pres�, Asociatia Transilvania Verde

2006-09-26 Fir de Conversatie Green Transylvania
25 septembrie 2006, Cluj-Napoca
Asociatia Transilvania Verde a înaintat o contestatie Ministerului Mediului ºi 
a Gorpodãririi Apelor, în care solicitã investigarea procedurii de emitere al 
acordului de mediu pentru exploatarea sienitelor din Ditrãu, respectiv 
respingerea emiterii acordului.
  Asociatia Transilvania Verde aduce obiectii datoritã restrictionãrii 
accesului publicului la studiul de evaluare a impactului, respectiv datoritã 
insuficientei informãrii factorilor interesati
   
  Detalii:
  http://www.greentransylvania.ro/home.php?lang=ro&kozep=1&id=148&m=1


www.greentransylvania.ro
  Portalul verde al Transilvaniei


-
Do you Yahoo!?
 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Sageata Albastra e cea mai mare tzeapa a transportului public! 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protest-ro/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/