Re: ThirdPartyAddOns
What's the difference between all these links? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Chris Kuklewicz wrote: > > Kenton, > > Could you change the link on the > > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns > > page for Haskell from > > http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers/ > > to > > http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers2/ > > And if there is room can you also add > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hprotoc > > ? > > -- > Chris > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ThirdPartyAddOns
Kenton, Could you change the link on the http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/wiki/ThirdPartyAddOns page for Haskell from http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers/ to http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/protocol-buffers2/ And if there is room can you also add http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hprotoc ? -- Chris --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ThirdPartyAddOns
> Done and done. Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ThirdPartyAddOns
Done and done. I didn't know protobuf-net had RPC or I would have listed it on the RPC implementations page some time ago. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Marc Gravell wrote: > > I notice the replacement ThirdPartyAddOns page; can you please also > include protobuf-net in the RPC section? It provides 2 separate RPC > implementations (WCF-based and bespoke). > > Also; I wonder if it might help to clarify (at the top) which > languages are provided in the official codebase; then the entire list > of implementations would be visible on a single page (just a thought). > > Thanks, > > Marc Gravell > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
