Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-15 Thread Rafael Schloming 
The staging repo has been released, the RCs were copied over to dist last
night, and the download page was updated this morning. I've also created a
0.3 branch.

--Rafael

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
> > I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.
>
> Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1.
>
> --
> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-15 Thread Rajith Attapattu 
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Darryl L. Pierce  wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>> Rafi,
>>
>> We should create tags for the releases.
>> Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for
>> 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though).
>
> There are branches for the releases, if not tags.

I do see the branches, but no tags!
The Apache process requires us to tag each release to do repeatable builds.

(In the case of 0.1 and 0.2 the stuff on the branch may or may not
correspond to the exact released versions)

Rajith

>
> --
> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce 
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
> I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.

Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgp3SlDxYPAwq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce 
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Rafi,
> 
> We should create tags for the releases.
> Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for
> 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though).

There are branches for the releases, if not tags.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgpeLXL8rjhq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Rajith Attapattu 
Rafi,

We should create tags for the releases.
Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for
0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though).

Regards,

Rajith

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Rafael Schloming  wrote:
> +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
> I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.
>
> --Rafael
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross  wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing.  It looks good.
>>
>> -Ted
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>>
>>> Source is here: 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/**qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
>>> Java binaries are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheqpid-118/
>>>
>>> Fixes since RC2 include:
>>>
>>>- messenger now reports aborted connections
>>>- tarball for ruby gem generation
>>>- ssl fix (PROTON-171)
>>>
>>> --Rafael
>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Rafael Schloming 
+1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one.
I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly.

--Rafael

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross  wrote:

> +1
>
> Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing.  It looks good.
>
> -Ted
>
>
> On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
>> Source is here: 
>> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/**qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
>> Java binaries are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapacheqpid-118/
>>
>> Fixes since RC2 include:
>>
>>- messenger now reports aborted connections
>>- tarball for ruby gem generation
>>- ssl fix (PROTON-171)
>>
>> --Rafael
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-11 Thread Ted Ross 

+1

Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing.  It looks good.

-Ted

On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:

Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
Java binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/

Fixes since RC2 include:

   - messenger now reports aborted connections
   - tarball for ruby gem generation
   - ssl fix (PROTON-171)

--Rafael

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-11 Thread Andrew Stitcher 
+1
Tested on FreeBSD 9.1:
+ cproton builds with gcc
+ cproton tests clean with manual PYTHONPATH setup.

But there are some install caveats (but not enough imo to nack this release)
- by default make install puts the libraries in the wrong place for
freebsd (in /usr/local/lib64 instead of /usr/local/lib). This isn't terrible
as it is possible to specify the correct location with -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=lib.
-- the package config file gets installed in the wrong place and there's
no way to specify the correct place.  

On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 21:53 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
> Java binaries are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/
> 
> Fixes since RC2 include:
> 
>   - messenger now reports aborted connections
>   - tarball for ruby gem generation
>   - ssl fix (PROTON-171)
> 
> --Rafael

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-10 Thread Cliff Jansen 
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz., builds and proton-test passes on rhel6.

For fun, I also tried clang.  It builds and runs too, but I had to
turn off -Werror to get past a handful of warnings about enums.  I
will get a JIRA on that for the 0.4 release.

Cliff

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Rafael Schloming  wrote:
> Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
> Java binaries are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/
>
> Fixes since RC2 include:
>
>   - messenger now reports aborted connections
>   - tarball for ruby gem generation
>   - ssl fix (PROTON-171)
>
> --Rafael

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-09 Thread Ken Giusti 
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz.  Unpacked & built on my Debian6 i686 vm.  
Manually set PYTHONPATH and successfully ran proton-tests. 

-K

- Original Message -
> Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
> Java binaries are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/
> 
> Fixes since RC2 include:
> 
>   - messenger now reports aborted connections
>   - tarball for ruby gem generation
>   - ssl fix (PROTON-171)
> 
> --Rafael
>

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-09 Thread Phil Harvey 
+1

Looks good to me.

I used Maven to fetch the Java api and implementation jars, and ran the
Python tests against them. All tests passed.

I also eyeballed the jar contents including the MANIFEST.mf files and
everything looked sensible.

Phil


On 9 January 2013 02:53, Rafael Schloming  wrote:

> Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
> Java binaries are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/
>
> Fixes since RC2 include:
>
>   - messenger now reports aborted connections
>   - tarball for ruby gem generation
>   - ssl fix (PROTON-171)
>
> --Rafael
>

[VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-08 Thread Rafael Schloming 
Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/
Java binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/

Fixes since RC2 include:

  - messenger now reports aborted connections
  - tarball for ruby gem generation
  - ssl fix (PROTON-171)

--Rafael