[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-971) [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link

2015-11-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14987509#comment-14987509
 ] 

Robbie Gemmell commented on PROTON-971:
---

Now merged to 0.11.x branch for inclusion in 0.11.0

> [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along 
> with a futher delivery for the same link
> 
>
> Key: PROTON-971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971
> Project: Qpid Proton
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: proton-j
>Affects Versions: 0.10
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.11
>
> Attachments: PROTON-971_test.patch
>
>
> Proton-j sends at most a single frame for a delivery in each call to 
> "processTransportWorkSender(DeliveryImpl delivery, SenderImpl snd)", which 
> occurs for each sent delivery on the 'transport work list' in turn during the 
> "processTransportWork" call. That call is made twice for each process of the 
> transport. As such, at most 2 frames for each delivery can be emitted for 
> each process of the transport. However, because all deliveries on the 
> connections 'transport work list' are processed in turn by 
> "processTransportWork", it is possible that interleaved transfer frames for 
> subsequent deliveries on the same link will also be emitted if there are 
> other buffered deliveries on the work list and the session window and frame 
> writer 'isFUll' checks permit it.
> This in itself would already be illegal [1] even if the frames were otherwise 
> correct, but the erroenous transfer frames also get marked with the wrong 
> delivery-id since that is only incremented by the transport when a delivery 
> has been completed, so if it was not all sent yet then the 
> initial/interleaved transfer frames for the subsequent delivery are also 
> stamped with the same id. Proton-j uses the delivery-id while consitituting 
> received deliveries, and thus the mismatch results in interleaving of the 
> payload from the later delivery within that for the earlier delivery.
> [1] 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#doc-idp484080
> "However, messages transferred along a single link MUST NOT be interleaved."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-971) [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link

2015-11-03 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14987494#comment-14987494
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-971:


Commit 3c527d2f09977f629fc34c5285e847949ceacb99 in qpid-proton's branch 
refs/heads/0.11.x from Robert Gemmell
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;h=3c527d2 ]

PROTON-971: record the in-progress delivery on the transport link, don't send 
transfers for new deliveries until the existing one is completed

(cherry picked from commit a94e635152e5ab32c3dbe5ea87f88173d01f4ce1)


> [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along 
> with a futher delivery for the same link
> 
>
> Key: PROTON-971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971
> Project: Qpid Proton
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: proton-j
>Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.11
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: PROTON-971_test.patch
>
>
> Proton-j sends at most a single frame for a delivery in each call to 
> "processTransportWorkSender(DeliveryImpl delivery, SenderImpl snd)", which 
> occurs for each sent delivery on the 'transport work list' in turn during the 
> "processTransportWork" call. That call is made twice for each process of the 
> transport. As such, at most 2 frames for each delivery can be emitted for 
> each process of the transport. However, because all deliveries on the 
> connections 'transport work list' are processed in turn by 
> "processTransportWork", it is possible that interleaved transfer frames for 
> subsequent deliveries on the same link will also be emitted if there are 
> other buffered deliveries on the work list and the session window and frame 
> writer 'isFUll' checks permit it.
> This in itself would already be illegal [1] even if the frames were otherwise 
> correct, but the erroenous transfer frames also get marked with the wrong 
> delivery-id since that is only incremented by the transport when a delivery 
> has been completed, so if it was not all sent yet then the 
> initial/interleaved transfer frames for the subsequent delivery are also 
> stamped with the same id. Proton-j uses the delivery-id while consitituting 
> received deliveries, and thus the mismatch results in interleaving of the 
> payload from the later delivery within that for the earlier delivery.
> [1] 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#doc-idp484080
> "However, messages transferred along a single link MUST NOT be interleaved."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-971) [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link

2015-11-03 Thread Justin Ross (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14987454#comment-14987454
 ] 

Justin Ross commented on PROTON-971:


Reviewed by Tim.  Approved for 0.11.0.

> [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along 
> with a futher delivery for the same link
> 
>
> Key: PROTON-971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971
> Project: Qpid Proton
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: proton-j
>Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.11
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: PROTON-971_test.patch
>
>
> Proton-j sends at most a single frame for a delivery in each call to 
> "processTransportWorkSender(DeliveryImpl delivery, SenderImpl snd)", which 
> occurs for each sent delivery on the 'transport work list' in turn during the 
> "processTransportWork" call. That call is made twice for each process of the 
> transport. As such, at most 2 frames for each delivery can be emitted for 
> each process of the transport. However, because all deliveries on the 
> connections 'transport work list' are processed in turn by 
> "processTransportWork", it is possible that interleaved transfer frames for 
> subsequent deliveries on the same link will also be emitted if there are 
> other buffered deliveries on the work list and the session window and frame 
> writer 'isFUll' checks permit it.
> This in itself would already be illegal [1] even if the frames were otherwise 
> correct, but the erroenous transfer frames also get marked with the wrong 
> delivery-id since that is only incremented by the transport when a delivery 
> has been completed, so if it was not all sent yet then the 
> initial/interleaved transfer frames for the subsequent delivery are also 
> stamped with the same id. Proton-j uses the delivery-id while consitituting 
> received deliveries, and thus the mismatch results in interleaving of the 
> payload from the later delivery within that for the earlier delivery.
> [1] 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#doc-idp484080
> "However, messages transferred along a single link MUST NOT be interleaved."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-971) [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link

2015-11-03 Thread Timothy Bish (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14987428#comment-14987428
 ] 

Timothy Bish commented on PROTON-971:
-

Reviewed the changes, fix seems valid.  

> [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along 
> with a futher delivery for the same link
> 
>
> Key: PROTON-971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971
> Project: Qpid Proton
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: proton-j
>Affects Versions: 0.10, 0.11
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: PROTON-971_test.patch
>
>
> Proton-j sends at most a single frame for a delivery in each call to 
> "processTransportWorkSender(DeliveryImpl delivery, SenderImpl snd)", which 
> occurs for each sent delivery on the 'transport work list' in turn during the 
> "processTransportWork" call. That call is made twice for each process of the 
> transport. As such, at most 2 frames for each delivery can be emitted for 
> each process of the transport. However, because all deliveries on the 
> connections 'transport work list' are processed in turn by 
> "processTransportWork", it is possible that interleaved transfer frames for 
> subsequent deliveries on the same link will also be emitted if there are 
> other buffered deliveries on the work list and the session window and frame 
> writer 'isFUll' checks permit it.
> This in itself would already be illegal [1] even if the frames were otherwise 
> correct, but the erroenous transfer frames also get marked with the wrong 
> delivery-id since that is only incremented by the transport when a delivery 
> has been completed, so if it was not all sent yet then the 
> initial/interleaved transfer frames for the subsequent delivery are also 
> stamped with the same id. Proton-j uses the delivery-id while consitituting 
> received deliveries, and thus the mismatch results in interleaving of the 
> payload from the later delivery within that for the earlier delivery.
> [1] 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#doc-idp484080
> "However, messages transferred along a single link MUST NOT be interleaved."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-971) [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link

2015-11-03 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14987200#comment-14987200
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-971:


Commit a94e635152e5ab32c3dbe5ea87f88173d01f4ce1 in qpid-proton's branch 
refs/heads/master from Robert Gemmell
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;h=a94e635 ]

PROTON-971: record the in-progress delivery on the transport link, don't send 
transfers for new deliveries until the existing one is completed


> [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent if buffered along 
> with a futher delivery for the same link
> 
>
> Key: PROTON-971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971
> Project: Qpid Proton
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: proton-j
>Affects Versions: 0.10
>Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.11
>
> Attachments: PROTON-971_test.patch
>
>
> Proton-j sends at most a single frame for a delivery in each call to 
> "processTransportWorkSender(DeliveryImpl delivery, SenderImpl snd)", which 
> occurs for each sent delivery on the 'transport work list' in turn during the 
> "processTransportWork" call. That call is made twice for each process of the 
> transport. As such, at most 2 frames for each delivery can be emitted for 
> each process of the transport. However, because all deliveries on the 
> connections 'transport work list' are processed in turn by 
> "processTransportWork", it is possible that interleaved transfer frames for 
> subsequent deliveries on the same link will also be emitted if there are 
> other buffered deliveries on the work list and the session window and frame 
> writer 'isFUll' checks permit it.
> This in itself would already be illegal [1] even if the frames were otherwise 
> correct, but the erroenous transfer frames also get marked with the wrong 
> delivery-id since that is only incremented by the transport when a delivery 
> has been completed, so if it was not all sent yet then the 
> initial/interleaved transfer frames for the subsequent delivery are also 
> stamped with the same id. Proton-j uses the delivery-id while consitituting 
> received deliveries, and thus the mismatch results in interleaving of the 
> payload from the later delivery within that for the earlier delivery.
> [1] 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-transport-v1.0-os.html#doc-idp484080
> "However, messages transferred along a single link MUST NOT be interleaved."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)