RE: A thanks to Slau and others; Pro tools Levels.

2014-05-10 Thread Poppa Bear
Ok Chuck, those are some hard words to crack in light of the current way of
thinking, but I may start reevaluating some of this information in order to
become better informed about all of it.

Thanks for sharing

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of CHUCK REICHEL
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:40 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A thanks to Slau and others; Pro tools Levels.

 

Hi Poppa,

What you noticed from that vocal session is where I basically keep my
levels, for the last 13 years using PT.

I've gotten very good results keeping it up there.

I will admit you half to be very diligent while running levels up there!

Heres some further clarification of the level discussion from my design
Engineer friend.

 

From tom Graefe

My ANALOG console  has a dynamic range greater than any Protools system.
The -20 dB standard by Sony I set for the SDDS system I designed.  The -20
dB is a reference for a nominal sound pressure level when mixing motion
pictures.  It allows 20 dB of headroom for the loud passages and a nominal
sound pressure level to be the same in all Theaters.

If you gave this guy some real test equipment and show him how to run it he
would be surprised how foolish he really is.  I have a $20,000.00 Audio
Precision test set.  If you run an IMD  (intermodulation Distortion, a 4 to
one mix of 60Hz and 7KHz) at -1dBFS and then do the same at -18 dBFS  the
IMD can be up to an order of magnitude higher.  Your Buddy has no idea about
how Digital audio or A/D converters work.

 

Later

Tom 

http://GraefeDesigns.com/

End of reply;

So in conclusion!

You can record at any level you want, that will determine the LEVEL of
quality you get!

I always refer back to the Creator for the real story!

Your Signal to noise ratio mileage will definitely vary! :)

Chuck

 

 

On May 9, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Poppa Bear wrote:





Thanks for sharing this Chuck, I am a bit on the fence about this still. I
do understand that many plugs such as the waves are calibrated for about
minus 18 DB or so, but at the same time there are controls to adjust many
aspects of levels as well as the way plugs respond to signals and such. I
had a friend who recorded a session in my studio yesterday with a client and
when I checked his session after they left the vocals were sitting at only
minus 4DB on the track and minus 10DB on the vocal bus and it sounded really
good. Given he doesn't use many plugs and he recorded with compression from
a Universal audio peace and as I said, it sounded pretty good with only a
touch of reverb. I also notice that I have some clients who are so dynamic
that I need to go even lower and some who really know how to project their
selves in a consistent way into the mic and I can be less conservative on
signal levels.   

 

From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of CHUCK REICHEL
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:57 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A thanks to Slau and others

 

Hi Poppa,

Just a couple of clarifications for you from my life time Friend tom Graefe
who was on the Sony Oxford console design teem. :)

 

Heres a couple of quick pointers to remember when tracking.

First 24 bit is the resolution of the A/D converter.  Yes theoretically the
Dynamic range of 24 bits is 144 dB.  The reality of usable range is
substantially less.  That 140+dB has nothing to do with volume or sound
pressure level.

   You should always record to maximum level before clipping to get the
maximum signal to noise ratio when recording individual tracks.  As you get
further away from 0dBFS you start showing up more of the non linearities of
the A/D process.  This is especially noticeable at very low levels.  There
is no need for headroom when recording Digital.  This is not tape.  The A/D
is most linear and least artifacts just before 0 dBFS.  When designing a
system you measure the IMD, Signal to Noise etc. of an A/D at -1 dBFS.
Sometimes at -0.5 dBFS.

 

Check out Tom's latest designs here;

http://GraefeDesigns.com/

HTH

Chuck

 

 

 

 

 

CHUCK REICHEL

soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com

www.SoundPictureRecording.com

954-742-0019

GUFFAWING :)

In GOD I Trust

 

On May 8, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Poppa Bear wrote:






I missed the talk, but in general I record vocals and instruments at about
minus 9 to minus 12DB. I do still get projects to mix from clients where
vocals are pushed to 0DB and the instrument track is often clipping so your
not alone in your experience.

- Original Message -

From: Slau Halatyn mailto:slauhala...@gmail.com 

To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com

Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:33 AM

Subject: Re: A thanks to Slau and others

 

Common mistake. People think they need to record as hot as possible and
that's not the case. Back when DAWs recorded in 16 bits, it was common
practice but with 24 bits, it's absolutely unnecessary. Glad it helped.

 

Slau

 

On May 8, 2014, 

Re: A thanks to Slau and others; Pro tools Levels.

2014-05-09 Thread CHUCK REICHEL
Hi Poppa,
What you noticed from that vocal session is where I basically keep my levels, 
for the last 13 years using PT.
I've gotten very good results keeping it up there.
I will admit you half to be very diligent while running levels up there!
Heres some further clarification of the level discussion from my design 
Engineer friend.

From tom Graefe
My ANALOG console  has a dynamic range greater than any Protools system.  The 
-20 dB standard by Sony I set for the SDDS system I designed.  The -20 dB is a 
reference for a nominal sound pressure level when mixing motion pictures.  It 
allows 20 dB of headroom for the loud passages and a nominal sound pressure 
level to be the same in all Theaters.
If you gave this guy some real test equipment and show him how to run it he 
would be surprised how foolish he really is.  I have a $20,000.00 Audio 
Precision test set.  If you run an IMD  (intermodulation Distortion, a 4 to one 
mix of 60Hz and 7KHz) at -1dBFS and then do the same at -18 dBFS  the IMD can 
be up to an order of magnitude higher.  Your Buddy has no idea about how 
Digital audio or A/D converters work.

Later
Tom 
http://GraefeDesigns.com/
End of reply;
So in conclusion!
You can record at any level you want, that will determine the LEVEL of 
quality you get!
I always refer back to the Creator for the real story!
Your Signal to noise ratio mileage will definitely vary! :)
Chuck


On May 9, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Poppa Bear wrote:

 Thanks for sharing this Chuck, I am a bit on the fence about this still. I do 
 understand that many plugs such as the waves are calibrated for about minus 
 18 DB or so, but at the same time there are controls to adjust many aspects 
 of levels as well as the way plugs respond to signals and such. I had a 
 friend who recorded a session in my studio yesterday with a client and when I 
 checked his session after they left the vocals were sitting at only minus 4DB 
 on the track and minus 10DB on the vocal bus and it sounded really good. 
 Given he doesn't use many plugs and he recorded with compression from a 
 Universal audio peace and as I said, it sounded pretty good with only a touch 
 of reverb. I also notice that I have some clients who are so dynamic that I 
 need to go even lower and some who really know how to project their selves in 
 a consistent way into the mic and I can be less conservative on signal 
 levels.   
  
 From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
 Of CHUCK REICHEL
 Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:57 AM
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: A thanks to Slau and others
  
 Hi Poppa,
 Just a couple of clarifications for you from my life time Friend tom Graefe 
 who was on the Sony Oxford console design teem. :)
  
 Heres a couple of quick pointers to remember when tracking.
 First 24 bit is the resolution of the A/D converter.  Yes theoretically the 
 Dynamic range of 24 bits is 144 dB.  The reality of usable range is 
 substantially less.  That 140+dB has nothing to do with volume or sound 
 pressure level.
You should always record to maximum level before clipping to get the 
 maximum signal to noise ratio when recording individual tracks.  As you get 
 further away from 0dBFS you start showing up more of the non linearities of 
 the A/D process.  This is especially noticeable at very low levels.  There is 
 no need for headroom when recording Digital.  This is not tape.  The A/D is 
 most linear and least artifacts just before 0 dBFS.  When designing a system 
 you measure the IMD, Signal to Noise etc. of an A/D at -1 dBFS.  Sometimes at 
 -0.5 dBFS.
  
 Check out Tom's latest designs here;
 http://GraefeDesigns.com/
 HTH
 Chuck
  
  
  
  
  
 CHUCK REICHEL
 soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
 www.SoundPictureRecording.com
 954-742-0019
 GUFFAWING :)
 In GOD I Trust
  
 On May 8, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Poppa Bear wrote:
 
 
 I missed the talk, but in general I record vocals and instruments at about 
 minus 9 to minus 12DB. I do still get projects to mix from clients where 
 vocals are pushed to 0DB and the instrument track is often clipping so your 
 not alone in your experience.
 - Original Message -
 From: Slau Halatyn
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 4:33 AM
 Subject: Re: A thanks to Slau and others
  
 Common mistake. People think they need to record as hot as possible and 
 that's not the case. Back when DAWs recorded in 16 bits, it was common 
 practice but with 24 bits, it's absolutely unnecessary. Glad it helped.
  
 Slau
  
 On May 8, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Christopher-Mark Gilland clgillan...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 Just wanted to thank everyone for their help yesterday with my issue 
 regarding clipping and how to better set levels.  Slau, I used the techniques 
 that you outlined.  I'll admit, it's a bit out of my comfort zone.  I'm not 
 use to recording initially at such a low impedance, but man!  I did a track 
 that way, then I raised the volume through