Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API

[Daniel Glazman]

Lachlan Hunt wrote:


Daniel Glazman wrote:

The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's
conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace
matching between previous versions of the doc and this one.


Are the minutes from this telcon available?


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0538.html

Re: [WebIDL] questions

[Cameron McCormack]

Kartikaya Gupta:
> Thanks for the quick fixes. I have one more (hopefully last) question:
> In section 4.5, the fourth bullet point says that interfaces with
> constants can't be implemented by ECMAScript native objects. Doesn't
> this exclude NodeFilter[1] from being implemented in native? This
> seems undesirable, since NodeFilter is meant to be implemented in
> native and passed in to the createNodeIterator/createTreeWalker
> methods, pretty much the same way EventListener works.

Good point.  I’ve loosened it to allow interfaces with constants and
operations to be implemented by native objects (though nothing need be
done with the constants):

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#native-objects

Thanks,

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API

[Lachlan Hunt]

Daniel Glazman wrote:

The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's
conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace
matching between previous versions of the doc and this one.


Are the minutes from this telcon available?


We have no official comment to make on this document.


Great, thanks.

--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/

CSS WG comments on Selectors API

[Daniel Glazman]

Hi,

The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's
conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace
matching between previous versions of the doc and this one.

We have no official comment to make on this document.


--
W3C CSS WG, Co-Chair

Re: XHR and AC4CSR Status [Was: [admin] Publishing moratorium for rest of 2008 - December 18 Deadline]

[Anne van Kesteren]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:08:57 +0100, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

Anne - what are your thoughts on publishing XHR (v1) and AC4CSR by
this moratorium?

I'm asking not to necessarily push you, but rather to get some status
and plans for these two specs as well as some potential actions for
me, Mike and/or Doug.

BTW, feel free to respond to the list instead of just us ...


Yo, I've been away for a long time due to Opera University Tours and  
holiday. I will make some time next week and the week after for  
XMLHttpRequest Level 1 & 2 as well as Access Control. Publishing before  
December 18 sounds good to me.


Kind regards,


--
Anne van Kesteren

Re: [WebIDL] questions

[Kartikaya Gupta]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:14:14 +1100, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments,
> 

Thanks for the quick fixes. I have one more (hopefully last) question: In 
section 4.5, the fourth bullet point says that interfaces with constants can't 
be implemented by ECMAScript native objects. Doesn't this exclude NodeFilter[1] 
from being implemented in native? This seems undesirable, since NodeFilter is 
meant to be implemented in native and passed in to the 
createNodeIterator/createTreeWalker methods, pretty much the same way 
EventListener works.

[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Traversal-Range/traversal.html#Traversal-NodeFilter