[FileAPI] Seeking status and plan

[Arthur Barstow]

Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?

What remains to be done before the spec is "LC ready"?

(Tracker shows 0 bugs and WebApps does not have a Bugzilla component for 
this spec).


-Thanks, AB

Re: [FileAPI] Seeking status and plan

[Arun Ranganathan]

On 4/11/11 9:38 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?

What remains to be done before the spec is "LC ready"?


Art:

A few things need to be done:

1. There continue to be a few spec. nits about multiple read calls; 
these have to be addressed.
2. We'll have to make the pieces of the spec. that address asynchronous 
events more in keeping with HTML5

3. There'll have to be some discussion about the blob: scheme.


(Tracker shows 0 bugs and WebApps does not have a Bugzilla component 
for this spec).




We can use Tracker and create the component if it is helpful; we used 
the public listserv and didn't really use the Bugzilla component or 
Tracker (except after F2Fs).


Regarding plan:

I'd like to tackle 1-3 (allowing time for discussion), and put this on 
the LC track by May 1.  Does that seem acceptable?


-- A*

Re: [FileAPI] Seeking status and plan

[Arthur Barstow]

On Apr/11/2011 11:20 AM, ext Arun Ranganathan wrote:

On 4/11/11 9:38 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

Hi Arun, Jonas - what is the status/plan for the File API spec?

What remains to be done before the spec is "LC ready"?


Art:

A few things need to be done:

1. There continue to be a few spec. nits about multiple read calls; 
these have to be addressed.
2. We'll have to make the pieces of the spec. that address 
asynchronous events more in keeping with HTML5

3. There'll have to be some discussion about the blob: scheme.


(Tracker shows 0 bugs and WebApps does not have a Bugzilla component 
for this spec).




We can use Tracker and create the component if it is helpful; we used 
the public listserv and didn't really use the Bugzilla component or 
Tracker (except after F2Fs).


Regarding plan:

I'd like to tackle 1-3 (allowing time for discussion), and put this on 
the LC track by May 1.  Does that seem acceptable?


Thanks Arun; yes that sounds good. -AB