Hi All - I just wanted to let people know that on February 28, Hixie and
I had a brief exchange about this in #webapps:
[[
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20110228
# [21:14] ArtB: i'm always going to answer "yes" whenever you
ask if anything is ready to go to LC, CR, REC, or whatnot. :-)
# [21:18] Hixie: oh, no, not another W3C process discussion :-)
# [21:19] We should probably avoid publishing an LC if you are
about to check in important changes that would affect an implementation
# [21:20] But I understand [at least I think I do :-)] your
perspective on publishing
# [21:20] i'm not aware of any pending important changes, but i
have 1668 e-mails in my pending feedback folders dating from the past 4
months or so, so i can make no guarantees
# [21:21] oh, dear
# [21:21] i can however guarantee that i won't make any changes
that harm implementations without having their ok
# [21:21] so whether it's in LC or REC or ED doesn't make any
difference to me or the implementors as far as i can tell :-)
# [21:21] Hixie - ok; good to hear!
]]
-AB
On Feb/28/2011 3:09 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hixie, All,
Is the HTML5 Web Messaging spec ready for Last Call Working Draft?
http://dev.w3.org/html5/postmsg/
If not, what must be done before it is ready for LC and what is the
time frame to complete the work?
Bugzilla [1] reports one bug for this component without a Resolution
and that bug is a simple editorial typo:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11978
-Art Barstow
[1]
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&;
amp;short_desc=&product=WebAppsWG&component=Web+Messaging+%28editor%3A+Ian+Hickson%29&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bug_id_type=anyexact&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
