Re: CFC on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension

[Léonie Watson]

A quick reminder that this CFC closes at the end of day tomorrow (Friday 
12th August).


Thanks.
Léonie.

--
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

On 05/08/2016 18:17, Léonie Watson wrote:

Hello WP,

This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) on the following proposal for
referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension specification
[1]. The CFC is posted to public-webapps@w3.org because this is the
official WP email list, and copied to public-h...@w3.org.

The proposal:

1. Remove the longdesc attribute from the table of attributes in HTML core.
2. Remove the IDL information for the longdesc attribute from HTML core.
3. Keep the longdesc examples in HTML core **.
4. Create a WG Note listing known extension specifications ***.
5. Include a link to the HTML Extension Specifications Note from HTML
core (probably in the index).

** Examples throughout the HTML specification are informative, and we
include informative examples and information for other specifications
and extensions
elsewhere in HTML core.

*** We anticipate that the Note will be updated as we identify new/other
extension specifications.

We are still exploring different ways of responding to a CFC. Please
choose one of the following methods:

1. Reply by email to this thread.
2. Reply or +1 to the original proposal comment on Github [2].

There is no need to use more than one method. The WP chairs will collate
the results across all channels.

Please respond by end of day on Friday 12th August. Positive responses
are encouraged, but silence will be taken as consent with the proposal.

Thanks
Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team
[1]  https://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/
[2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507#issuecomment-237068400

Re: CFC on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension

[Mona Rekhi]

+1

via CloudMagic 
Email
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 1:21 PM, L?onie Watson 
> wrote:


Hello WP,

This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) on the following proposal for
referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension specification
[1]. The CFC is posted to public-webapps@w3.org because this is the
official WP email list, and copied to public-h...@w3.org.

The proposal:

1. Remove the longdesc attribute from the table of attributes in HTML core.
2. Remove the IDL information for the longdesc attribute from HTML core.
3. Keep the longdesc examples in HTML core **.
4. Create a WG Note listing known extension specifications ***.
5. Include a link to the HTML Extension Specifications Note from HTML
core (probably in the index).

** Examples throughout the HTML specification are informative, and we
include informative examples and information for other specifications
and extensions
elsewhere in HTML core.

*** We anticipate that the Note will be updated as we identify new/other
extension specifications.

We are still exploring different ways of responding to a CFC. Please
choose one of the following methods:

1. Reply by email to this thread.
2. Reply or +1 to the original proposal comment on Github [2].

There is no need to use more than one method. The WP chairs will collate
the results across all channels.

Please respond by end of day on Friday 12th August. Positive responses
are encouraged, but silence will be taken as consent with the proposal.

Thanks
L?onie on behalf of the WP chairs and team
[1]  https://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/
[2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507#issuecomment-237068400
--
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

Re: CFC on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension

[John Foliot]

Despite lingering concerns about removing a valid attribute from the table
of attributes in the document, in the interest of cooperation and
collaborative consensus building I will agree with this CfC.

JF

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Léonie Watson  wrote:

> Hello WP,
>
> This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) on the following proposal for
> referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension specification [1].
> The CFC is posted to public-webapps@w3.org because this is the official
> WP email list, and copied to public-h...@w3.org.
>
> The proposal:
>
> 1. Remove the longdesc attribute from the table of attributes in HTML core.
> 2. Remove the IDL information for the longdesc attribute from HTML core.
> 3. Keep the longdesc examples in HTML core **.
> 4. Create a WG Note listing known extension specifications ***.
> 5. Include a link to the HTML Extension Specifications Note from HTML core
> (probably in the index).
>
> ** Examples throughout the HTML specification are informative, and we
> include informative examples and information for other specifications and
> extensions
> elsewhere in HTML core.
>
> *** We anticipate that the Note will be updated as we identify new/other
> extension specifications.
>
> We are still exploring different ways of responding to a CFC. Please
> choose one of the following methods:
>
> 1. Reply by email to this thread.
> 2. Reply or +1 to the original proposal comment on Github [2].
>
> There is no need to use more than one method. The WP chairs will collate
> the results across all channels.
>
> Please respond by end of day on Friday 12th August. Positive responses are
> encouraged, but silence will be taken as consent with the proposal.
>
> Thanks
> Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team
> [1]  https://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507#issuecomment-237068400
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
>


-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.fol...@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion

CFC on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension

[Léonie Watson]

Hello WP,

This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) on the following proposal for 
referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension specification 
[1]. The CFC is posted to public-webapps@w3.org because this is the 
official WP email list, and copied to public-h...@w3.org.


The proposal:

1. Remove the longdesc attribute from the table of attributes in HTML core.
2. Remove the IDL information for the longdesc attribute from HTML core.
3. Keep the longdesc examples in HTML core **.
4. Create a WG Note listing known extension specifications ***.
5. Include a link to the HTML Extension Specifications Note from HTML 
core (probably in the index).


** Examples throughout the HTML specification are informative, and we 
include informative examples and information for other specifications 
and extensions

elsewhere in HTML core.

*** We anticipate that the Note will be updated as we identify new/other 
extension specifications.


We are still exploring different ways of responding to a CFC. Please 
choose one of the following methods:


1. Reply by email to this thread.
2. Reply or +1 to the original proposal comment on Github [2].

There is no need to use more than one method. The WP chairs will collate 
the results across all channels.


Please respond by end of day on Friday 12th August. Positive responses 
are encouraged, but silence will be taken as consent with the proposal.


Thanks
Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team
[1]  https://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/
[2] https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507#issuecomment-237068400
--
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem