Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
Hi Art, and all, I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that we publish a CR directly. Thanks. — xiaoqian On 2015-5-14, at 7:30pm, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is [2] and the review period will be three weeks. The draft includes a summary of the changes since the REC was published [3]. 2. Update the REC errata doc [4] to include a reference to the new WD and its changes since REC section, and the github commit history. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this proposal. -Thanks, ArtB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0607.html [2] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/ [3] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/#status-of-this-document [4] http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/publish/errata-v1.html
Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this proposal. +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. Thanks, -Anssi
RE: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 21:16 To: Arthur Barstow Cc: public-webapps Subject: Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. Yes, the spec looks good to me. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this proposal. +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. I also regenerated an implementation report at http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webstorage/all.html ... for your reference. BTW: I have sent out the above info yesterday, but seems the mailing list system didn't get it. Thanks, Zhiqiang
CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
Hi All, Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft WD is [2] and the review period will be three weeks. The draft includes a summary of the changes since the REC was published [3]. 2. Update the REC errata doc [4] to include a reference to the new WD and its changes since REC section, and the github commit history. If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this proposal. -Thanks, ArtB [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0607.html [2] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/ [3] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/#status-of-this-document [4] http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/publish/errata-v1.html
