Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
On 11/7/14 11:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: this is a Call for Consensus to: a) Publish a gutted WG Note of the spec (see [Draft-Note]) FYI, this WG Note has been published http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-XMLHttpRequest2-20141118/.
RE: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
From: cha...@yandex-team.ru [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. I guess I was just inspired by Mike Smith earlier saying something along the lines of don't let past practice constrain your thinking as to what can be done in this case, and was hopeful we could come to the even-more-optimal solution. In any case, maybe we could also add meta name=robots contents=noindex to this and previous drafts?
Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
08.11.2014, 14:46, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me: From: cha...@yandex-team.ru [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. I guess I was just inspired by Mike Smith earlier saying something along the lines of don't let past practice constrain your thinking as to what can be done in this case, and was hopeful we could come to the even-more-optimal solution. In any case, maybe we could also add meta name=robots contents=noindex to this and previous drafts? I'd object to doing that. While some search engines sometimes provide odd results for queries that match a series of drafts (I know, we're guilty of that too), overall I think it is helpful to be able to find oddities that were in a draft for a while. In particular it supports people doing a little bit of investigation on their own, rather than making it necessary to find someone who was around at the time and can give a clear and comprehensive explanation of how and why a decision was made. Something that *would* make sense to me is to start adding schema.org metadata for documents. And checking that we can e.g. explain that some document is superseded by another one. I'll go put my schema.org hat on and chase that down... cheesr -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
During WebApps' XHR discussion on October 27, no one expressed interest to work on XHR L2 [Mins]. The last TR of XHR L2 was published in January 2012 [WD] thus that version should be updated to clarify work has stopped. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to: a) Publish a gutted WG Note of the spec (see [Draft-Note]) If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by November 14 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. In the absence of any non-resolvable issues, I will see make sure the Note is published. -Thanks, AB [Mins] http://www.w3.org/2014/10/27-webapps-minutes.html#item21 [WD] http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest2/ [Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/? Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing spec to the W3C one?
Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
07.11.2014, 18:28, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me: On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/? Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing spec to the W3C one? That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. But yeah, a pointer is a pretty obvious thing to put in. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14
On 11/7/14 1:05 PM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote: 07.11.2014, 18:28, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me: On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/? Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing spec to the W3C one? That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. But yeah, a pointer is a pretty obvious thing to put in. Yes, sorry, I meant to include that. I just checked in a patch that adds a reference and link for WebApps' XHRL1 spec and the WHATWG spec above. That patch add this info to the SotD section https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html#sotd. Currently, the Draft Note does not include Latest Editor's Draft data in its boilerplate. If we want to add that data, it's not clear if we want to add WebApps' ED and/or WHATWG's spec. Strong preferences? -Thanks, AB
