Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

2011-03-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:08 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com  
wrote:

There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to
favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).

However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete
and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to
publish a spec that conflicts/overlaps with D3E. Additionally, some
members have been working on D3E for a relatively long time and they
naturally want to preserve their investment.

Doug expressed [DS] willingness to change D3E (to align with DOM Core
Events) if there is broad consensus for changes. In this spirit of
cooperation, before a new WD of DOM Core is published, I think the next
step is to do as Doug suggested and identify all D3E issues.

Anne asked [AvK] about the mechanism to use to identify issues. Unless
Doug suggests otherwise, I recommend using a separate thread per issue
on the www-dom mail list.


I followed your suggestion:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2011JanMar/

I also addressed the concerns raised by Adrian. I and Ms2ger also added  
several people to the list of acknowledgments that we missed initially.  
Can we publish now? :-)



[DS]  
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0687.html

[AvK]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0722.html



--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/



Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

2011-03-03 Thread Arthur Barstow

Hi All,

There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to 
favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).


However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete 
and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to 
publish a spec that conflicts/overlaps with D3E. Additionally, some 
members have been working on D3E for a relatively long time and they 
naturally want to preserve their investment.


Doug expressed [DS] willingness to change D3E (to align with DOM Core 
Events) if there is broad consensus for changes. In this spirit of 
cooperation, before a new WD of DOM Core is published, I think the next 
step is to do as Doug suggested and identify all D3E issues.


Anne asked [AvK] about the mechanism to use to identify issues. Unless 
Doug suggests otherwise, I recommend using a separate thread per issue 
on the www-dom mail list.


-Art Barstow

[DS] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0687.html
[AvK] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0722.html


On Feb/23/2011 11:20 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to 
work on the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working 
Draft of the spec:


http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM 
Core. If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please 
send them to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest.


As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged 
and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.


-Art Barstow




Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

2011-02-24 Thread Maciej Stachowiak

I support this publication.

 - Maciej

On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

 Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work on 
 the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the spec:
 
   http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
 
 As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM Core. 
 If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them to 
 public-webapps by March 2 at the latest.
 
 As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and 
 silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.
 
 -Art Barstow
 
 



CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

2011-02-23 Thread Arthur Barstow
Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work 
on the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of 
the spec:


  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM 
Core. If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please 
send them to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest.


As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged 
and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.


-Art Barstow




Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

2011-02-23 Thread Ojan Vafai
I also support.

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:

 I support this.

 / Jonas

 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
 wrote:
  Anne and Ms2ger (representing Mozilla Foundation) have continued to work
 on
  the DOM Core spec and they propose publishing a new Working Draft of the
  spec:
 
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
 
  As such, this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new WD of DOM
 Core.
  If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send
 them
  to public-webapps by March 2 at the latest.
 
  As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged
 and
  silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.
 
  -Art Barstow