CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16

2011-04-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
The Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new 
Working Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so:


 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

If one agrees with this proposal, it: a) indicates support for 
publishing a new WD; and b) does not necessarily indicate support for 
the contents of the WD.


If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send 
them to public-webapps by April 16 at the latest.


As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged 
and silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.


-Art Barstow







Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16

2011-04-09 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
 The Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new Working
 Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so:

  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

 If one agrees with this proposal, it: a) indicates support for publishing a
 new WD; and b) does not necessarily indicate support for the contents of the
 WD.

 If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
 to public-webapps by April 16 at the latest.

 As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and
 silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.

I support publishing this document.

~TJ



Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16

2011-04-09 Thread Jonas Sicking
I support this.

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
 The Editors of the Indexed Database API would like to publish a new Working
 Draft of their spec and this is a Call for Consensus to do so:

  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html

 If one agrees with this proposal, it: a) indicates support for publishing a
 new WD; and b) does not necessarily indicate support for the contents of the
 WD.

 If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please send them
 to public-webapps by April 16 at the latest.

 As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and
 silence will be assumed to be agreement with the proposal.

 -Art Barstow