cc John Neumann
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
JSON is deliberately minimal and deliberately unversioned.
What are you expecting this working group to do? Also, given that JSON is
essentially a subset of ECMAScript literal syntax, I'm unsure why this
isn't being handled by TC39
It's more then a subset, it's specified in Ecma-262 Edition 5.1, which is
ISO/IEC 16262:2011[0].
Rick
[0]
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=55755
--Oliver
On Feb 18, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
We're planning on doing a BoF in Orlando to discuss starting up a JSON
working group. The BoF is currently planned for Monday afternoon at
1300
in Carribean 6. A very preliminary version of a charter can be found
here:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/trac/wiki/JSON
But obviously we'll need to build consensus on what it should actually
contain. Please discuss on the j...@ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg08912.html
)
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
