I support the FPWD publication.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:40 AM
To: ext Kinuko Yasuda; WebApps WG
Subject: Is Quota Management API ready for First Public Working Draft?
Hi Kinuko, All - what are people's thoughts on whether or not the Quota
Management API spec is ready for First Public Working Draft?
A rule of thumb for FPWD is that the ED's scope should cover most of
the expected functionality although the depth of some functionality may
be very shallow, and it is OK if there are open bugs/issues.
-Thanks, Art
On 5/29/12 12:30 AM, ext Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
mailto:ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Kinuko Yasuda
kin...@chromium.org mailto:kin...@chromium.org wrote:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
I noticed something else. StorageInfo is marked as Supplemental and
NoInterfaceObject, but I do not think either is meant to be used here.
Supplemental has been replaced by partial interface (rather than
[Supplemental] interface), but is only supposed to be used if this
is not the original definition (and I do not think StorageInfo is
defined elsewhere). NoInterfaceObject is used prevent certain
interfaces from being prototyped, but I do not think we want that here
either.
Oops.. thanks very much for pointing out those mistakes.
You're right, neither Supplemental nor NoInterfaceObject look
appropriate here.
I dropped them from the draft.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Thanks!
