Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
Hi Art, and all, I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that we publish a CR directly. Thanks. — xiaoqian > On 2015-5-14, at 7:30pm, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > Hi All, > > Based on Xiaoqian's analysis [1] of Web Storage changes since the REC was > published in 2013, this is a Call for Consensus to: > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. The draft > WD is [2] and the review period will be three weeks. The draft includes a > summary of the changes since the REC was published [3]. > > 2. Update the REC errata doc [4] to include a reference to the new WD and its > changes since REC section, and the github commit history. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 > at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and > explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are > raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this > proposal. > > -Thanks, ArtB > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0607.html > [2] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/ > [3] https://w3c.github.io/webstorage/#status-of-this-document> > [4] http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/publish/errata-v1.html >
RE: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
> From: Kostiainen, Anssi [mailto:anssi.kostiai...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 21:16 > To: Arthur Barstow > Cc: public-webapps > Subject: Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21 > > > On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. > > This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. Yes, the spec looks good to me. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May > 21 at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and > explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are > raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this > proposal. > > +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. I also regenerated an implementation report at http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webstorage/all.html ... for your reference. BTW: I have sent out the above info yesterday, but seems the mailing list system didn't get it. Thanks, Zhiqiang
Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21
> On 14 May 2015, at 14:30, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > 1. Publish a new WD of the spec and to seek wide review of the spec, per > process 2014. The new WD will be placed in w3.org/TR/webstorage/. This addresses the concern and clears the confusion around an outdated /TR. > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by May 21 > at the latest. Silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal and > explicit responses are preferred. If no non-resolvable blocking issues are > raised, this CfC will be considered as passing and we will proceed with this > proposal. +1. Thanks for the swift turnaround. Thanks, -Anssi
